Ai안경 백만원이나 주고 살 필요도 없음 대여서비스도 있네 ㅋㅋ

Channel
채저시급 김으악ㅠ
@Ugh_HH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,793subscribers
-393 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001207868729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ugh_HH |
| Description | 모든 문의는 김으악👉🏻 @udiopop |
| Created | 10 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ugh_HH |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:58 | 9,793 | -18 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:37 | 9,811 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 9,823 | -20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:50 | 9,843 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 9,864 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 9,868 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 9,882 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 9,890 | -12 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 9,902 | -16 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 9,918 | -16 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 9,934 | -112 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 10,046 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 10,055 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 10,064 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 10,070 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 10,087 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 10,094 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 10,111 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 10,118 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 10,128 | first reading |
Engagement
908 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.03%
- avg views ÷ 9,793 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 199
- 338 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.521%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 338
- of 908 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 338 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 908 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 67,171 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 23:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,700
- Videos
- ≈768
- Links
- ≈17,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8m 16s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 59 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 38.8% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 13.2% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 9.09% | |
| 🖕 | 11 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 8.26% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 7.44% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.48% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 908 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 908 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 338 posts held from the last 30 days (1.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
후 비트코인 믿고 취침하자 무습다
와 근데 첨봤는데 이런 말 하면 미안하지만 표독하게 생김 저사람 어떤 동창이 편법 좋아하고 삥뜯고 때렸다 어쩐다 댓글 남겼는데 진짜 그럴 것 같음 ;;;;; 약간 그것도 싸가지 없는 그런 종류가 아니라 걍 질이 안좋게 생김
악귀들린듯
다들 하따해도 레버리지 너무 크게하지마세요 레버리지 조심하세요 ㅡㅡ
낼 점메추 해드립니다 순살게살비빔밥 👍
찐반인가요 믿고 자도 되나요
어차피 자고일어나면 다 끝나잇다 오르돈가 내리던가 해있다 자러가자
트럼프 소셜 미국에서 너무 많은 사람들이 9/11을 기억하기에는 너무 어리거나 잊어버린 사람들이다. 의미심장핞
비트코인 이거 왜해야함? 나스닥이 저렇개 오르는데?
[속보] 트럼프, 젠슨황 퇴진에 "그 자리 이어받을 사람은 애플 팀 쿡" 걍 바로 게이 가져다 꽂는군아
이란 빨리 합의됐으면 좋겠어.. 트럼프가 노벨평화상 받아야 한다고 생각해요 니..
Showing the 12 most recent of 908 posts we hold for @Ugh_HH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
비트코인의 운명
- 75K를 깨고 오른다27%
- 75K를 안깨고 오른다30%
- 70K 까지 깬다16%
- 이번 하락으로 60K 간다27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 908 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@coinforus · 124 posts호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,4552 postsBQ
@BQTelegram · 9,3211 post아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,8151 post에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,7901 post팩머 크립토
@FackMeo · 1,3081 post옹살랜드
@OngsalYee · 6,1261 post에어드랍스토리 : 코린이가 이것저것 알게되었다.
@airdropstoryKOR · 851 postAri의 Web3 탐구생활
@ariadne_scrap · 5221 post3회차 230만불->0원부터 다시 시작하기..
@crypty2017 · 8071 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,6031 postTrends & Tips 😎⚡️
@honeylifetip · 9,3771 post헤다 아카이브
@imhedacool · 3,8091 post여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8131 postWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 22,9711 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,8011 post우사기짱의 비밀동굴🐰
@raelinpalebluedot · 3821 post시팡이 공부방~~❤️
@sipangE · 4,3081 postSP CRYPTO CHANNEL 정보방
@spcryptochannel · 671 post💎 탑골공원
@topgolpark · 1591 post메타부 스토리
@x2emeta · 3,5381 postT.A Crypto
@yul_papa · 7,5171 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@gotnommed · 31711 posts라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,8705 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,3264 postsMidnight Network 한국 공지 채널
@midnight_kor · 3,2864 posts크립토마카세
@cryptomacase · 10,9093 posts춘식 뿜🧂
@ChunsikPark · 422 postsNodo의 부두술
@Roh0517 · 2,5882 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,1262 posts디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,0252 posts불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,7032 posts여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8132 posts쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,5012 posts조안 vc5444.com
@zhishizhiyun · 2,8912 postsBRILLER
@BRILLER_Research · 17,9611 post조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,9571 postGMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,1491 post이니셜 영투한
@Initial02Han · 8,5201 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4461 postBuy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,3031 postbite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,5601 postCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,3891 post크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,1041 post싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,0081 post미친개병신새끼도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,4411 post다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,1621 post텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,5111 post불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,2051 post고따 일기장
@goraetrackerKR · 7,5571 post희단이 메모장
@heedan_memo · 4,7871 post종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 10,3041 postLondon potato's Arbitrage
@londonpotato · 1,7571 post룰루비데
@lululaladick · 2,3661 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,1641 post머니스택
@money0stack9Notice · 7,8561 post머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,7771 post잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,7421 post신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,3431 post매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,3871 post윤로그 공지방
@yunlog_official · 10,7211 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,126
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@twitchoong · 79,159
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,511
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“채저시급 김으악ㅠ” (@Ugh_HH), 9,793 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ugh_HH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.