2026.08.12 14:22:04 기업명: 원익QnC(시가총액: 8,070억) A074600 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 2,719억(예상치 : 2,729억/ 0%) 영업익 : 309억(예상치 : 291억/ +6%) 순이익 : 227억(예상치 : 215억+/ 6%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 2,719억/ 309억/ 227억 2026.1Q 2,562억/ 219억/ 144억 2025.4Q 2,491억/ 184억/ -54억 2025.3Q 2,303억/ 80억/ 26억 2025.2Q 2,329억/ 141억/ -116억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260812900356 회사정보: https://finance.naver.com/ite…

Channel
마산창투
@PRROEresearch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,608subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001983369845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PRROEresearch |
| Description | 성장하는 산업의 핵심 기업에 투자 부는 올바른 습관이 반복된 결과 매수, 매도 추천아님 유통 채널을 지양 개인적인 욕심으로 운영하는 채널 채널에서 언급하는 섹터, 종목들은 포트폴리오에 보유하거나 보유할 수도 있음 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PRROEresearch |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 4,608 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 4,615 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 4,615 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.70%
- avg views ÷ 4,608 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 447
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.465%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 38
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,544 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,230
- Videos
- ≈16
- Links
- ≈3,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 70.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
중국 태양광 기업들, 19억 달러 적자 후 원가 이하 판매 중단 합의 - DIGITIMES (by https://t.me/TNBfolio) - 중국 태양광 업계가 2년 이상 지속된 가격 전쟁과 막대한 손실 끝에 원가 이하 판매를 중단하기로 합의했다. - Tongwei, GCL Tech 등 중국 태양광 소재 생산 능력의 80% 이상을 차지하는 주요 8개 기업이 반출혈경쟁 자율 규제 협약에 서명했다. - 올해 상반기 중국 주요 상장 태양광 기업 21곳의 합산 손실은 최대 167억 9000만 위안에 달할 것으로 추산된다. - polysilicon 가격은 2022년 고점 대비 약 90% 급락해 대다수 생산 업체들의 제조 원가를 하회하는 수준까지 떨어졌다. - 중국 정부가 공정한 원가 산정 기준을 마련하고 가격 감독 조사를 강화함에 따라 시장 정상화 …
#해성디에스 AI 데이터센터가 놓은 성장 카드 억눌렸던 리드프레임, 눌려있던 스프링이 풀리다 하반기 리드프레임 기대 요인은 세 가지 1) 응용처 믹스 전환. 기존 전장 중심 구조에서 데이터센터향 신규 수요 확장을 축으로 IT 및 컨슈머 비중이 상향 중 2) ASP 상향에 따른 마진 개선. 동사 리드프레임 판가는 LME 가격에 약 5개월 후행해서 반영. 1Q 급등한 구리 가격에 금 등 원재료 가격 하락이 겹치며 2Q26 리드프레임 영업이익률은 18%까지 상승한 상태. 고환율 기조가 유지될 경우 추가 ASP 상향 여지도 남아있어 3Q까지 호실적이 기대되는 상황 3) 북미향 히트슬러그 매출 창출 기대. 북미 주요 팹리스 업체향 히트슬러그는 5월 말 퀄 테스트에 진입했으며 연내 양산이 유력한 것으로 파악. 그동안 전기차 시장 부진으로 억눌…
#심텍 [NDR 후기] 달라진 사이클 소캠 전망, 수익성은 어떠한가? 동사는 2Q26 실적 발표를 통해 소캠 시장 전망을 연초 대비 상향했음. 지난 6월 고객사의 중량 요청이 있었던 것으로 파악되며, 당사는 소캠 용량 축소에 따른 수량 증가가 일부 영향을 미친 것으로 추정함 투자자들의 관심은 수익성에 집중됐음. 회사는 소캠 모듈 PCB의 수익성을 별도로 공개하지 않았으나, HDI 사업의 이익 개선 속도가 감안하면 소캠이 상당한 고수익 제품임을 짐작할 수 있음. 당사는 소캠 모듈 PCB의 영업이익률이 일반 모듈 CPB 대비 5배 이상일 것으로 추정함 과거 사이클과 무엇이 다른가? 메모리 고객사들이 컨퍼런스콜에서 '이번 사이클은 과거와 다르다'는 늬앙스를 강조하면서, 동사에도 과거 사이클과 달라진 부분이 있는지 묻는 질문이 많았음 동…
❤1
목표가, 가치, 관측, 미래, 주식공부 https://blog.naver.com/roe_20/224375632139
2026.08.12 10:48:45 기업명: 실리콘투(시가총액: 2조 9,575억) A257720 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 4,026억(예상치 : 3,822억+/ 5%) 영업익 : 830억(예상치 : 715억/ +16%) 순이익 : 723억(예상치 : 433억+/ 67%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 4,026억/ 830억/ 723억 2026.1Q 3,466억/ 645억/ 543억 2025.4Q 3,059억/ 424억/ 358억 2025.3Q 2,994억/ 631억/ 584억 2025.2Q 2,653억/ 522억/ 356억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260812900140 회사정보: https://finance.naver.c…
# 파미셀 (시총: 6,966억원) *기판 CCL 소재기업 - 2Q26 실적공시 [ SK증권 박형우, 정영환] IT 하드웨어 / 배터리 ▶️ 실적 공시: - 매출액: 390억원 (+8% YoY) (컨센 매출: 392억원) - 영업이익: 132억원 (+118% YoY) (컨센 OP: 132억원) - OPM: 34% (컨센 OPM: 34%) ▶️ URL: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260812000044 * SK증권 리서치 IT팀 채널 : https://t.me/skitteam
#코스맥스 확신의 매수 구간: 전 법인 좋고, 3분기 자신감 있고 2Q26 Review: 전 법인 실적 호조, 자신감 있는 3분기 2분기 연결 매출액 및 영업이익은 각각 7.9천억원(YoY 28%), 737억원(YoY 21%)으로 시장기대치 +6% 상회. 국내외 전 법인 매출이 예상을 상회하는 호실적을 기록 1) 한국 매출액 및 영업이익은 각각 5.2천억원(+YoY +23%), 564억원(YoY +13%) 시현. Top2 고객사(에이피알, 더파운더즈)를 포함한 기초 고객사 전반적인 강세 지속. 특정 고객사가 아닌 전반적인 업황 호조가 이어지며 기존 가이던스(15%) 대비 높은 성장을 시현 또한, 수익성 우려 요인이었던 겔마스크팩이 최근 수익성 개선되며 긍정적. 또한, 아이패치 볼륨이 크게 증가하면서 수익성 기여 중 3분기 국내 수익…
#NHN AI 팩토리로 고성장 진입 2Q26 Review: 게임과 클라우드 부문이 만든 서프라이즈 NHN은 2Q26 영업수익 7,579억원(+25.3% YoY, +12.9% QoQ), 영업이익 579억원(+164.2% YoY, +120.6% QoQ, 영업이익률 7.6%)을 기록하며 컨센서스 상회 게임 부문은 웹보드 게임 규제 완화(결제한도 상향)와 <컴파스> 콜라보 업데이트 성과 반영 결제 부문은 페이코의 수익성 높은 식권 사업과 KCP의 신규 가맹점 유입에 다른 거래대금 성장 지속 기술 부문은 AI GPU 사업의 매출 반영 본격화. 양평 리전 B200 공급 시작되며 NHN 클라우드는 전년대비 85% 성장 NHN클라우드는 인프라를 계속 확대하며 중장기적인 수요에 적극적으로 대응할 계획 양평 리전 잔여분에 대해서도 신규 장기 계약…
DOW 53,791.9p (-0.34%) NASDAQ 26,445.4p (-0.60%) S&P 500 7,728.2p (-0.32%) 10년물 국채금리 4.684% (-0.32%) WTI $83.51 (+0.37%) 원/달러 환율: 1,413.5 (-0.42%) 유틸리티, 에너지 강세 빅테크 약세 Fear & Greed Index: GREED PUT AND CALL OPIONS: GREED KOSPI ADR: 122.75 KOSDAQ ADR: 116.73 투자자예탹금: 100,718,025 (-3.35%) 신용융자: 30,023,768 (+2.71%)
👍1
삶에 변화를 주는 방법 https://youtu.be/V7mg5ZBAudo?si=89oBartv70D-Hio9
❤2
* 8월 1~10일 DRAM 수출 단가: 선형적/구조적 상승세 지속
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @PRROEresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 942,312 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@darthacking · 64,4058 posts중국주식반점(饭店)
@chinastockrestaurant8 · 4,7722 posts[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 23,2192 posts한화 철강 권지우
@cheolkangtracking · 6001 postIT의 신 이형수
@hslpartners · 17,6291 post엄브렐라리서치 Jay의 주식투자교실
@Jstockclass · 25,7711 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,6181 post[신한 리서치본부] 유틸리티/신에너지
@ShinhanUtilityNewEnergy · 4,4991 post[ IT는 SK ]
@skitteam · 17,6891 postTNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 24,5881 postNihil's view of data & information
@viewofdata · 12,0101 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“마산창투” (@PRROEresearch), 4,608 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PRROEresearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.