CPI MoM 0.4% Food 0.5% Energy 0.7% Core CPI 0.3% Goods 0.2% Services 0.3% Shelter 0.3%
🗿4

Channel
@crazyecon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
7,501subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001550266895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crazyecon |
| Description | 안녕하세요 iM전략 김준영입니다 |
| Created | 14 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crazyecon |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 7,501 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:58 | 7,504 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 7,508 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 7,512 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 7,515 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 7,520 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 7,530 | +5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 7,525 | +79 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 7,446 | -1 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 7,447 | -12 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 7,459 | -8 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 7,467 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 7,478 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 7,480 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 7,479 | +19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 7,460 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 7,465 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 7,472 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 7,478 | +50 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 7,428 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (10 June 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 96,610 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 02:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
408 reactions across 55 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 164 | 40.2% | |
| 👍 | 89 | 21.8% | |
| 😭 | 89 | 21.8% | |
| 🗿 | 17 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.96% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 1.72% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.735% | |
| 🎅 | 3 | 0.735% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.245% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.245% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.245% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crazyecon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
CPI MoM 0.4% Food 0.5% Energy 0.7% Core CPI 0.3% Goods 0.2% Services 0.3% Shelter 0.3%
🗿4
빅스텝 하진 않겠(?)지만 월러가 제시한 0.3%에 근접
🗿5✍2
10월 CPI 예상치 상회
😭12
월러 연설 요약 핵심: 10월 CPI가 개선돼도 12월 25bp 인상을 지지한다. 10월 근원 CPI가 전월비 0.3% 이상이면 50bp 인상을 검토해야 한다고 했다. 1. 10월 동결 이유 시장이 이미 인상을 가격에 반영하고 있었다. 중요한 것은 예고한 인상을 실제로 이행하는 것이다. 연속 회의에서 올릴 필요는 없다고 봤다. 2. 경기/고용 3분기 GDP 성장률은 3.4%다. 소비와 AI 설비투자가 성장을 주도했다. 10월 실업률은 4.1%, 비농업 고용은 16.5만 명 증가했다. 6·12개월 평균 증가폭은 월 8만 명이다. 월러는 노동 수급이 균형이라고 평가했다. 3. 노동시장 역동성 (중장기 화두) 고용 상황은 "저채용·저해고"다. 월러는 "안정적인 노동시장이 곧 건강한 것인가"라는 질문을 던졌다. 원인으로는 고령화와 고학력화를 꼽…
❤2👍1
[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 단기 반등과 불편한 환경 ▶️ 데이터센터 지연은 AI 인프라 진영에 취약한 내러티브, 코스피 소외 가능성 - 미국 중간선거에서 민주당 하원 탈환. 텍사스 주지사 당선인 히노조사는 주의회 입법 전까지 데이터센터 승인 전면 중단 공약. 취임일은 1월 19일 - 텍사스는 계획 용량 22GW를 넘는 미국 최대 건설 지역. 26년 가동 예정 16GW 중 실제 착공은 약 5GW에 그침. 27년 가동 물량도 이연 가능 - 메모리 증설은 예정대로, 데이터센터 가동은 지연. 칩 수급 갭이 예상보다 빨리 좁혀질 수 있음. 다만 칩 수요는 소멸보다 시차를 둔 이연 가능성이 큼 - 코스피는 미국 지수가 아닌 미국 테크 내 하드웨어 상대 강도를 추종. 미국 반등을 인프라 가격 하락 수혜주(소프트웨어/빅테크)가 이끌면 한국은 소외…
❤3😭2
AI 수요가 아니라 AI 투자 비용과 수익성을 묻는 중 AI 수요는 꺾이지 않았다. 토큰 처리량은 앞으로도 기하급수적으로 늘어날 것 시장이 묻는 것은 수요가 아님 지금 가격으로 투자가 계속될 수 있느냐는 것 이렇게 비싼 인프라 가격을 언제까지 감당할 수 있느냐 우리 모두는 AI 인프라 가격을 상수로 놓고 이야기하고 있음 AI 인프라 가격이 하락하면 조달 자금의 규모도 capex 집행 기업들의 부담도 줄어들 것 AI 인프라 가격이 상수라면 capex 집행 기업들의 부담이 심화될 것 -> 그래서 지금 m7에 대한 반응이 좋지 않음 붕어빵 이야기 - 붕어빵이 갑자기 인기다. 굽는 기술이 어려워서 먼저 자리를 잡고 점유율을 높여야 하는 사업이다. 너도나도 뛰어든다. - 붕어빵 틀 주문이 몰린다. 틀 가격이 치솟는다. 틀 제조사는 마진 80%의…
👍6❤2
[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 참아왔던 시장의 인내심 테스트 ▶️ Capex 규모보다 현금 회수, 빅테크 실적에 대한 시장 반응이 갈림 - 메타는 3Q capex 349억불에 FCF -21억불로 적자 전환, 주가 -7% 내외. 알파벳은 4년 만에 매출과 이익을 동시에 미스. capex 513.6억불에 FCF -90.7억불로 2분기 연속 적자. 주가는 -12.6%로 상장 이후 최대 낙폭 - MS는 Azure +48%에 capex가 컨센(약 500억불)을 하회한 452억불. FCF는 흑자 유지, 주가 약보합. 아마존은 AWS +39.3%로 5년 내 최고 성장률이나 3Q 단독 FCF 약 -335억불, 시간외 -6~7% - 시장은 AI 투자 자체를 부정하지 않음. 회수를 기다려주는 기간이 짧아진 것 ▶️ FCF를 가르는 것은 본업 체력, ’…
👍3
[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ [2027 연간전망] 디커플링: 미국에는 있고 한국에는 없는 것 ▶️ 매크로: Late Cycle Recession, 금리 피크아웃이 증시 피크아웃 우려로 번질 수 있는 국면 - 물가와 경기는 예상보다 양호. ESI는 미국이 가장 견조. 다만 우상향하는 금리를 견디기 어려운 변곡점에 근접. - 26년 10월 금융환경/이익 사이클 순환도상 주가에 가장 부정적인 2사분면(금융환경 긴축, 이익 증가) 진입. - 금리 상승은 BEI가 아닌 TIPS가 주도. AI 조달 수요와 성장 기대가 배경. 03년 이후 성장형 TIPS 상승 12번의 S&P500 중앙값 +8.0%, 상승 확률 83%. 향후 금리 하락은 성장 둔화 형태로 나타날 가능성. '금리 상승 = 주가 상승' 논리가 반대로 작동할 수 있음. - 9월 인상에…
❤8👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ AI 인프라 내러티브 균열, 단기바닥을 찾아서 ▶️ 코스피 바닥 레인지 5,100~5,340pt, 이격도 -15%는 바닥이 아닌 투매 진입 신호일 수도 - 1차 지지 5,550~5,600pt(여름 종가 저점, 20일 이격도 -15% 환산값)는 야간선물 감안 시 이미 이탈 - 핵심 지지는 5,100~5,340pt. 12개월 선행 P/B 1배(5,100pt), 26년 상승분 78.6% 되돌림(5,338pt), 7/29 장중 저점(5,263pt)이 겹치는 구간. 그 아래는 4,900~5,000pt(25년 4월 이후 상승분 61.8% 되돌림) - 20일 이격도는 10/15 -16.9%로 99년 이후 하위 0.4% - 과거 이격도 -15% 하회 6개 국면은 이후 40거래일간 중간값 -13.8% 추가 하락. 이 수치…
❤4😭2
9월 소매판매, PPI 예상치 상회
😭18👀4
화요일까지 늘었던 코스피 신용잔고 신용잔고는 전고점 대비 약 -10% 지수는 -40%
😭15
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @crazyecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @crazyecon as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iM전략 김준영” (@crazyecon), 7,501 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazyecon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.