Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

iM전략 김준영

@crazyecon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,415subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550266895
TypeChannel
Username@crazyecon
Description안녕하세요 iM전략 김준영입니다
Created14 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crazyecon

Growth

7,4117,4157,4137 August 2026 — 7,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,414 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,415 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,410–7,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:047,415+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:587,414+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:167,411first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.0%
avg views ÷ 7,415 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,080
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.104%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held26 (10 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total53,030
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
705
Links
740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 26 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7643.4%
👍4525.7%
😱179.71%
😭158.57%
🔥84.57%
52.86%
🎅31.71%
🤬31.71%
10.571%
🍾10.571%
😈10.571%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC≈10,900 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 반도체가 떠난 빈자리 ▶️ 반도체는 무겁고, 나머지는 살아나는 중 - 코스피 6월 말 조정 이후 6,000pt대 횡보. 반도체 반등 부재로 7,000pt 아래 갇힌 국면. - 삼성전자+SK하이닉스 합산 비중 47%대로 하락했으나 여전히 절반 수준. 반도체 섹터 전체는 5월 초 이후 코스피의 절반 이상 여전히 유지. - 시장 전반의 이익수정비율은 2분기부터 반등해 21년 5월 이후 최고. 온기 확산은 이미 진행 중 ▶️ 2분기 서프라이즈 비율 상단, 확산의 토대 - 방산 조선 증권 건설 등 주요 섹터에서 예상치 상회 빈도 증가. 발표 기업 기준 2분기 서프라이즈 비율 상단 수준. - 영업이익 추정치 5% 이상 상회 기업 비중은 21년 1분기 이후 최고치. - 이익수정비율과 서프라이즈 비율 동시 고점권. 지

6

7 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈5,850 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

5월, 6월 지표 모두 각각 66k, 37k 하향조정

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈5,940 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

NFP 하락은 정부 일자리에서 53k 감소 월드컵 수혜가 2달 연속 사라진건지 레저접객에서 40k 감소

👍5

7 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈5,650 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

- 경제활동참가율 하락 - 취업자보다 실업자 감소가 컸음

🎅3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈3,930 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

달러 약세, 미국채 강세, 주식 중립(?) -> 소폭 강세

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,430 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

7월 고용 예상치 (크게) 하회

😱31

4 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈2,020 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영, 이승재] [전략/크레딧] ★AI 사이클: 주식 시장의 기대와 크레딧 시장의 계산 [크레딧] AI 사이클, 주주와 채권자의 시선이 교차한다 - AI 사이클, 성장에서 자본효율성으로 - AI의 다음 질문: 누가 비용을 지불하는가 - AI 순환투자와 취약한 고리 - 채권자의 시선에서 본 AI 사이클, 무엇이 필요한가 [전략] 전고점으로 가는 길 참 맑기도 하다 - AI 기업들을 주식의 관점이 아니라 채권의 관점으로 접근할 필요 - 베스트 시나리오 상에서 지수 상단 8,400pt 제시. 7,000pt대에서 개인 매물 출회 가능성 높아 박스권 전망 - 1차 랠리는 반도체 중심. 이후에는 로테이션 유의할 필요 - 반도체에 대한 믿음이 약해질수록 코스닥 주목할 필요. 7월 전망과 논리는 같으나 주도주의 가격이 다른 상황 자세한

3

29 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,240 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

시장은 2번 보는 중 매파적 동결인지 아닌지가 매우 중요해졌음 이와중에 유가 다시 튀는 중

😭4

29 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,000 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

What to Watch for at the Fed Meeting - Nick T ① 동결이 기본값, 변수는 반대표 - 6월 물가 둔화와 워시의 청문회 침묵이 동결을 가리킴 - 반대표 한두 개가 나오면 내부 인상 압력이 쌓였다는 신호 - 워시는 성명서 문구 조정 같은 기존의 소통 방식을 입장이라 이견이 그대로 노출될 소지가 있음 ② 인상은 정치/전략적 선언 - 현 기조에 편안함을 표한 인사들을 뒤집는 것이라 연준 커뮤니케이션의 신호 가치가 훼손 - 백악관 주장과도 충돌하지만 역으로 "트럼프 대리인" 의심은 지울 수 있음 - 다만 긴축이 지금 물가 압력을 어떻게 잡는지에 대한 설명이 없다는 게 약점. 윌리엄스는 정책으로 신뢰를 만들려는 접근 자체를 반박 ③ 프레이밍이 시장 방향을 가른다 - 연속 인상의 첫 발로 규정되면 장기금리는 오히려

2

26 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC≈2,010 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

[iM증권 김준영] [주식전략] ★ 단기에는 수급장, 지수가 오르면 로테이션 대비 ▶️ 신용잔고 부담과 개인 매물, 지수 상방 압력 상쇄 - 코스피 신용잔고 하락 더뎌 코스닥과 대조적. 지수는 4월 말 수준 회귀했으나 신용잔고는 5월 중순 수준 잔존, 지수 상승 시 출회 물량 지속 우려. - 개인 비중 및 영향력 확대 속 매물 축소 제한적, 지수 상승 시 매도 압력 지속 시사. - 7월 외국인 누적 1조 순매도. 종가 7,000pt 상회 시 익일 순매도 전환 패턴(15일 7,284pt·23일 7,096pt 직후), 6,000pt대에선 중립적. ▶️ 주체별 수급 차별화 - 개인 고점 이후 삼성전자/하이닉스 순매수 집중. 약 6개월 학습효과로 반도체 편중 지속. - 금융투자는 선물 고평가 속 현물 매수(차익거래)로 나타나 방향성 매매로 보기

2

21 Jul 2026, 23:48 UTC≈1,870 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

숫자가 나오면 2차 랠리를 더 높게 가져갈 수 있는 배경 닷컴 버블 당시 지수는 한번에 죽지 않음 1차 하락(00년 3월)은 약 30% 가량 고점대비 낮아진 상황에서 재차 반등하면서 6개월 가량 횡보 1차 하락은 인터넷 버블 기업들이 맞았음 찐 추세 하락은 00년 9월이었음 1차하락과 찐하락 사이 6개월간 어떤 종목들이 좋았을까 2차 랠리 종목들의 공통 특징 1) "실적이 있는" 인프라 하드웨어 - 노텔은 광전송장비, 주니퍼는 라우터, 코닝은 광섬유 케이블, EMC는 기업용 스토리지로 실제 매출과 이익이 폭발적으로 성장 2) 주문 잔고(backlog)가 실제로 강했음 - 통신 capex는 2000년 내내 계속 증가했고, 분기 실적은 컨센서스를 계속 상회 - 밸류에이션 정당화 논리가 "언젠가의 수익"이 아니라 "지금 눈에 보이는 수주"였

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @crazyecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,480 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iM전략 김준영” (@crazyecon), 7,415 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazyecon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.