Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

팔칠사공스토너 실전투자 인사이트

@stoner8740

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,023subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002378754614
TypeChannel
Username@stoner8740
Description전업투자자의 생생한 매매현황 기업분석 주식뉴스 뷰를 실시간 말씀드립니다. ※ 이 채널의 모든 메세지는 매수 매도 추천채널아 아닙니다. 모든 메세지의 정보나 데이터는 어떠한 정확성도 검증이 없습니다. 투자책임 손실 등 모든 것은 투자자 본인에게 귀속됩니다. 전업투자자의 시각에서 저렇게 매매하는구나 실시간 뉴스라든지 뉴스에 대한 매수매도를 저렇게 판단하는구나 그냥 구경만 하시면되겠습니다. 절대 매수/매도 추천이 아닙니다.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stoner8740

Growth

11,02311,03411,028.56 August 2026 — 11,028 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,030 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,025 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,027 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,023 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,021–11,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:4311,023-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:1311,027-2
9 Aug 2026, 23:3211,029+4
8 Aug 2026, 20:5211,025-5
7 Aug 2026, 22:5811,030-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:1211,034+6
6 Aug 2026, 03:3511,028first reading

Engagement

122 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 11,023 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
122
of 122 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held122 (5 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total358,125
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,910
Videos
13
Links
4,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC725 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

구독자분들 이렇게 TV만보면 주식의 신이 따로없습니다. 그리고 유료가입 루트가있죠? 저는 이런것도 심각하다고 봅니다. 관심가져라 20개 30개 던져두고 올라가면 이렇게 수익 광고하고요

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#이마트 적자전환이군요 13일 전자공시에 따르면 이마트는 2분기 연결기준 잠정 영업이익이 -430억원으로 전년 동기 216억원에서 적자전환했다.

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bdragon0808

https://www.thebionews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=27178

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://www.etoday.co.kr/news/view/2614137 13일 업계에 따르면 한국거래소가 주가 또는 시총 기준 미달로 관리종목 지정 대상에 올린 상장사 36곳 가운데 제약·바이오 기업은 cmg제약과 샤페론, 노을, 랩지노믹스, 에이비온 등 5곳으로 나타났다. 이들은 12일 장 마감 기준 주가가 1000원 미만이거나 시총 기준을 충족하지 못했으며 이날부터 관리종목으로 지정됐다.

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 13 August 2026

한국바이오는 기적의 논리가 통하는게 예전 코아스템이 국내 조건부허가 2010년대 받았을때 전세계 루게릭 환자들 한국와서 점유율은 몇프로 차지할거다 환자수는 몇명 예시로 들면서 약가 얼마 계산 후 조단위 수익날거다 고로 수십조 가야된다 Hlb리보세라닙도 약가 점유율 계산해서 수조원 순이익날거다 이런게 못지킬확률이 99프로여도 일단 남발하고봅니다. 여러모로 바이오는 말이 안되는 장밋빛 멘트에 따라 주가가 좌지우지 되니까요.

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @bdragon0808Photo

수술로봇이 단 200대만 깔려도 ISRG대비 2% 수준 이니, 적정시총은 6조라는 분석

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @thebio111

앱클론이 중국 헨리우스(Henlius)에 기술이전(L/O)한 인간 상피세포 성장인자 수용체2(HER2) 표적 항체인 ‘AC101(개발코드명, 헨리우스 개발코드명 HLX22)’의 HER2 양성 전이성 위암 글로벌 임상3상 톱라인(Top-line) 결과가 2027년 상반기 공개될 예정입니다. 앱클론에 따르면, 파트너사인 헨리우스는 트라스투주맙 바이오시밀러인 ‘한쿠유(HANQUYOU)’ 승인 6주년을 맞아 HER2 치료제 포트폴리오와 후속 파이프라인 개발 현황을 발표했습니다. 앱클론이 기술이전한 AC101은 헨리우스가 개발 중인 차세대 HER2 표적 항체 파이프라인입니다. 현재 헨리우스는 HER2 양성 전이성 위암 1차 치료 환자를 대상으로 AC101의 글로벌 임상3상을 진행하고 있습니다. AC101의 임상3상 톱라인 데이터는 내년 상반기 공개

Signed 스토너

13 Aug 2026, 01:34 UTC≈2,350 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#펩트론 제가 비판글도 몇번 남기고했는데 제가 지금 뷰를 굳이 남기진 않지만 최호일대표 발언으로 하한가가면서 10만원깨지고 지금 드라마틱하게 반등하면서 20만원 고지까지 거의 왔는데 펩트론 주주든 아니든 가장 궁금하죠 릴리가 도대체 언제 계약이 나올지 초미의 관심사인데 펩트론에 나름 전문적인 지식을 바탕으로 계약이 나올거라고 주장하는분들이 셀 수 없이 많습니다. 저는 개인적인 성향에 의해서 펩트론 주주가 아니지만 제 성향은 2-3만원 3-4만원에 펩트론 주주가 되자가 제 마인드입니다. 어찌됐든 이종목이 계약이 나올거라 주장하는분들이 워낙 많아서 같이 한번 지켜보시죠 26년내에 펩트론이 바이오 붐에 기여를 할지 그 기대감이 확실하다 보니 주가는 견고하네요

Signed 팔칠사공

13 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#씨어스 주식에서 가장 어려운게 실적주입니다. 그래서 꿈과희망의 신약바이오가 최고입니다. 신약바이오는 적자많이날수록 훈장입니다. 그만큼 연구개발비 임상비용으로 많이 지출했다는거니니까요

Signed 팔칠사공

12 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 팔칠사공

12 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 13 August 2026

셀트리온의 항체-약물접합체(adc) 신약 후보물질 3종이 모두 미국 식품의약국(fda) 패스트트랙 지정을 받았다. 셀트리온은 adc 신약 후보물질 'ct-p73'이 fda로부터 패스트트랙 대상으로 지정됐다고 13일 밝혔다. 이에 따라 임상 1상을 진행 중인 adc 후보물질 ct-p70, ct-p71, ct-p73 3종 모두 패스트트랙에 지정됐다. #셀트리온

Signed 팔칠사공

12 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈2,970 viewsread 13 August 2026

#에보뮨 #에이프릴바이오 에보뮨은 이제 에이프릴바이오 물질이고 임상 2a상에서 괜찮은 top line을 뽑아낸 EVO301이 거의 전부인 회사입니다.

Signed 스토너

Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @stoner8740. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@stoner8740 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 160,272 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“팔칠사공스토너 실전투자 인사이트” (@stoner8740), 11,023 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stoner8740.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.