여기는 아니지?

Channel
여의도 감성투자
@ygamsung
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,745subscribers
+233 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001117483208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ygamsung |
| Created | 2 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ygamsung |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:06 | 6,745 | +10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 6,735 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:51 | 6,743 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 6,742 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 6,745 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 6,742 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 6,741 | +29 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 6,712 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 6,713 | -3 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 6,716 | -4 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 6,720 | -10 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 6,730 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 6,735 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 6,739 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 6,745 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 6,749 | +35 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 6,714 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 6,717 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 6,710 | +26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 6,684 | first reading |
Engagement
76 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.3%
- avg views ÷ 6,745 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,710
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 76 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 39,229 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
오라클 / 래리 엘리슨 / 졸린 주 (부인, 중국 태생) 코인베이스 / 브라이언 암스트롱 / 앤절라 멍 (부인, 중국 태생)
“I owe my family and all of you an apology.”
Video, posted without a caption
?
[속보]국민연금 10년 가입자 수령액, 기초연금보다 적어
$PLTR update - TCV(분기수주액) yoy +5.7%로 기대치 하회. 그 결과 RDV(잔여계약)도 qoq +2.3% 증가에 그침 - RDV/매출은 1.45배까지 하락했고 매출성장률이 수주/잔여계약 성장률을 앞지르고 있는 상황에서 성장의 지속가능성에 대한 의문 증대 - 컨콜에서 계약기간이 평소보다 짧았다는 언급을 하면서 4Q 가이던스를 상향했는데, (계약의 갱신을 통해) 낮아진 RDV/매출 상황에서도 현재와 같은 성장률이 나올 수 있는지 시험대에 오른 상황 - 긍정적인 측면은 NRR은 165%로 2Q(157%)보다도 더 오름. 팔란티어는 AI slop이 아니라 생산성 증대를 가져온다는 것은 숫자로 나날이 증명 - Alex와 Ryan의 혼을 담은 구라 컨콜(e.g. 세계사적 갈림길에 서있다)은 어떤 결과로 돌아올 것인가? AH -2…
권대영 금융위원회 부위원장이 "100% 매수를 강제할 경우 M&A 인수 자금 부담으로 시장이 위축된다"며 1997년 입법례를 들어 50%+1주 방안을 강력히 고수한 것이다. 이 같은 구조가 관철된 배후에는 사모펀드(PEF) 업계의 물밑 대관과 금융위원회의 정책적 요구가 맞물려 있다는 분석이 많다. 금융당국은 "인수 자금 부담 완화를 통한 M&A 위축 방지"를 명분으로 내세웠으나 실증 연구 결과는 이와 정반대다.
https://naver.me/xnO2a9rb
만 73세 억만장자 할배도 크립토 DEX 투자하고 X에 홍보함. 열심히 살아야겠지?
$MSFT $GOOGL CAPEX, FCF, 주주환원 확연한 전략차이 AH $MSFT +3.18% $GOOGL -9.11%
불과 3개월 만에 천지개벽
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @ygamsung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ygamsung edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@songjongsik · 18,5054 postsPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,6033 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,6631 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0871 post크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,1041 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,0251 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7071 post습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,2951 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,1201 post인터넷/플랫폼/성장산업/투자 뉴스, 정보 스크랩
@miraeyj · 5,6171 postBack To The Future 디터
@monsjae · 1591 post어이 청진기
@rising_090 · 3,2811 post실버만삭스의 루틴
@silvermansachs_routine · 7,8851 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sypark_strategy · 29,245
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,239
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@athletes_village · 22,138
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@globaletfi · 20,575
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
@habit4117 · 28,295
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@daegurr · 23,789
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@bufkr · 21,563
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,363
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,206
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 25,163
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@pharmbiohana · 29,789
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@SmallCap · 22,982
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@merITz_tech · 24,857
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,083
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@desperatestudycafe · 18,510
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
@huhpharm · 24,264
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,047
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,513
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“여의도 감성투자” (@ygamsung), 6,745 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ygamsung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.