Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Truth_투자스터디

Channel

The Truth_투자스터디

@repeatandrepeat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,853subscribers

+89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654959285
TypeChannel
Username@repeatandrepeat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/repeatandrepeat

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,7485,8555,801.57 August 2026 — 5,764 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,764 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,763 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,748 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,768 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,767 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,766 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,766 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,768 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,766 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,759 subscribers30 September 2026 — 5,770 subscribers7 October 2026 — 5,789 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,790 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,794 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,795 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,838 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,833 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,855 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,854 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,848 subscribers10 November 2026 — 5,853 subscribers5,8537 August 202610 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 95 days, net +89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,732–5,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:565,853+5
3 Nov 2026, 21:295,848-6
31 Oct 2026, 20:205,854-1
28 Oct 2026, 12:415,855+22
25 Oct 2026, 08:585,833-5
22 Oct 2026, 12:115,838+43
19 Oct 2026, 12:365,795+1
16 Oct 2026, 04:565,794+4
13 Oct 2026, 15:205,790+1
7 Oct 2026, 09:005,789+19
30 Sept 2026, 08:185,770+11
19 Sept 2026, 14:015,759-7
14 Sept 2026, 19:215,766-2
11 Sept 2026, 13:385,768+2
2 Sept 2026, 03:045,766+4
30 Aug 2026, 12:385,762-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:375,766-1
24 Aug 2026, 08:285,767+5
20 Aug 2026, 22:475,762-6
17 Aug 2026, 14:255,768first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 5,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held59 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total18,899
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 29 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8835.3%
❤7429.7%
🥰3012.0%
😁239.24%
🙏176.83%
👏93.61%
💯41.61%
🔥20.803%
🤷‍♀10.402%
🦄10.402%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,060 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026

불확실성 해소로 갔으면 좋겠네요

🙏8🦄1

4 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,100 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

https://n.news.naver.com/article/011/0004678611?cds=news_media_pc

👍3

4 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,080 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026

출처는 딱히 보이지 않고 합성 같네요

😁4

4 Nov 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,460 views35 reactionsread 4 November 2026

#삼천당제약 일회용 무보존제 녹내장 안약 시장이 성장하는 가운데, 삼천당제약 라타스트의 점유율은 3.1%에서 11.0%로 상승했습니다. 라타스트는 글로벌 제약사에 공급돼 유럽에서도 해당 회사의 브랜드로 판매되고 있습니다. 또한 특허심판 1심에서 유리한 결과를 얻어 타플로탄-에스 제네릭의 조기 출시 가능성도 높아졌습니다. → 요약해보면 대충 이런 내용.

👍34👏1

4 Nov 2026, 04:48 UTC342 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @SCD_Investors

녹내장 시장 '단일제 한계', 삼천당제약의 돌파구는 1회용 무보존제 안녕하십니까, 삼천당제약입니다. 오늘자 약업신문은 국내 녹내장 치료제 시장이 제네릭 난립으로 약가 바닥에 이르렀다며, 업계가 무보존제 1회용 점안제, 복합 개량신약, 정상안압녹내장 신약의 세 갈래로 돌파를 시도하고 있다고 분석했습니다. 이 가운데 복합제는 2028년 발매가 목표이고 신약은 3상 진입이 지연되고 있어, 지금 상업화 성과가 확인되는 축은 1회용 무보존제뿐입니다. 삼천당제약은 바로 이 축을 약 10년 전부터 준비해 왔습니다. 다회용 안약의 보존제(벤잘코늄염화물)가 각막 손상·안구건조를 유발해 시장이 1회용으로 이동하는 흐름 속에서, 1회용 라타노프로스트 '라타스트'는 유비스트 기준 점유율이 2025년 3월 3.1%에서 2026년 8월 11.0%로, 병·의원 채…

❤5👏2

4 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 4 November 2026

- AMD 실적도 의미 없네요. 일단 블루웨이브를 시장에선 반영하는 것으로 보입니다. → 데이터센터 노이즈에 따라 전닉은 하락세이고, 민주당 수혜주로 분류되는 ESS 및 신재생 관련주가 반등하는 모습이네요. → 노이즈를 어디까지 프라이싱할지는 알 수 없기에 조심스럽지만 데이터센터가 가장 활발히 지어지는 주중 하나인 펜실베니아의 경우 민주당 강세임에도 불구하고 데이터센터가 계속해서 지어지고 있었습니다. → 공화당이 상하원을 모두 장악했음에도 마음대로 못하는 것이 미국 정치입니다. 제롬 파월을 내쫒고 싶어했음에도 아직도 연준에 남아 있는 모습을 보면 알 수 있듯이 결국 양당의 합의가 이뤄져야 정책적 진전이 가능하며 데이터센터 관련 이슈는 결국 합의로 이어질 가능성이 높다고 생각합니다. → 다만, 합의로 이어지는 과정이 매끄럽지 않을 수 …

4 Nov 2026, 04:09 UTC749 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

•트럼프는 인터뷰에서 중간선거 결과를 받아들이겠다고 밝힘. •트럼프는 “민주당과 협력할 것”이라고 언급 •공화당의 선거 패배는 자신이 투표용지에 이름을 올리지 않았기 때문이라고 주장 >特朗普在接受采访时表示,他将接受中期选举结果。特朗普表示,“我们将与民主党合作”。特朗普称,共和党的失利归咎于他没有出现在选票上。(纽约时报) (来自华尔街见闻) **?????

4 Nov 2026, 00:48 UTC663 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @ho1land

3q26. Amgen (AMGN) - PAVBLU (Eylea 시밀러) (분기 / 매출액 / 단위 : $ million) 4q24 / 31 1q25 / 99 2q25 / 130 3q25 / 213 4q25 / 258 1q26 / 280 2q26 / 287 3q26 / 300 4q24. 출시 이후 매 분기 가파른 계단식 성장을 지속해 온 PAVBLU(Eylea 2mg 시밀러)는 2q26. 287 million 달러(yoy +121%)에 이어, 3q26. 300 million 달러(yoy +41%, qoq +4.5%)를 달성하며 암젠 바이오시밀러 사업부 성장의 최대 핵심 축으로 완전히 자리잡았읍니다. 3q26. 순판매가(Price)가 전년 동기 대비 18% 하락하였지만, 처방 물량(Quantity)이 71% 급증하며 단가 하락분을 완전히 압…

4 Nov 2026, 00:22 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 4 November 2026

1. 하이퍼스케일러를 포함한 자본공급자들의 투자 지속 여부 2. LTA의 지속 가능성 → 이 두개가 이번 AI사이클의 키라고 생각하고, 1,2번 모두 금리가 핵심이라고 생각. 다만, 현 주가는 LTA는 언제든지 깨질 수 있다고 의심하는 단계가 아닐까 생각하며 특히 1번이 무너지면 2번 또한 자연스럽게 파기될 수 있지 않을까 의심하고 있는 단계라고 보여짐. → 즉, 현 금리를 좌우하는 유가가 하향 안정화되거나 다운사이클로 예상하는 시기에도 계속해서 호실적을 보여준다면 이는 뒤집어 질 수 있지만 모두 시간이 필요하며 단기적으로는 전쟁이 진정되며 미국 데이터센터 건립 이슈가 안정화되는 것이 필요.

4 Nov 2026, 00:07 UTC737 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @hedgeharaPhoto

꽤 인상깊은 차트인게 LTA를 못 믿는이유는 고객이 언제든지 파기할 수 있기 때문이다.. 라는 논리를 반박하는 차트 과거 다운사이클 재현해본 결과 LTA 훼손하려면 60%정도 가격하락이 나와야 한다

3 Nov 2026, 22:50 UTC657 views33 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @scdzito

https://www.pharmnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=307457 경구용 인슐린 후보물질 SCD0503도 차세대 성장동력으로 개발되고 있다. 삼천당제약은 지난 10월 유럽에서 진행한 임상 1상 환자 투약을 완료했다. 이번 임상은 제1형 당뇨병 환자를 대상으로 경구용 인슐린과 피하 투여 인슐린의 상대적 생체이용률과 생물학적 효력, 음식 섭취에 따른 영향을 평가하는 방식으로 설계됐다. 실제 환자를 대상으로 경구 투여 방식의 가능성을 살펴보는 임상으로, S-PASS의 적용 범위를 넓히는 중요한 개발 단계다.

❤26👍4🔥2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @repeatandrepeat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,510
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Truth_투자스터디” (@repeatandrepeat), 5,853 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repeatandrepeat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.