Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

배터리맨 일렉허니

@battermanyo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,890subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808125620
TypeChannel
Username@battermanyo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/battermanyo

Growth

2,8902,8942,8927 August 2026 — 2,894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,894 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,890 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,889–2,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:422,890-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,894no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:162,894first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 2,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
688
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total13,752
Reactions total240
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

240 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20083.3%
2711.3%
🕊62.50%
👎31.25%
💩31.25%
🤮10.417%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC462 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EMchina

CATL 이춘시 리튬 광산 생산 중단 China’s CATL pauses lithium production at Yichun hub for maintenance amid supply monitoring https://x.com/FirstSquawk/status/2085585551902884304

👍171

7 Aug 2026, 00:23 UTC663 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

삼전닉스가 그래도 버텨줘야...

👍6

7 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC687 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

포스코 퓨처엠은 사실상 JV라 이익이 제한되고 엘앤에프는 순수 자회사여서 ESS면에서는 더 찐이죠. LG엔솔에 대한 LFP 수주 기대감도 반영되려나 봅니다

👍261👎1

7 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC682 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

수주 소식을 낸 포스코퓨처엠보다 엘앤에프가 상승폭이 더 크네요

👍23

6 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC493 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiwoom_semibat

안녕하세요 키움 이차전지 권준수입니다. 채널: https://t.me/kiwoom_semibat/ ♠ 엘앤에프 (TP 16만원) 견조한 출하량 속 하반기는 LFP 양극재 검증의 시기 ♠ 투자 포인트 1) 엘앤에프의 2Q26 실적은 매출액 8,850억원(+20%QoQ, +70%YoY), 영업이익 208억원(-82%QoQ, 흑자전환 YoY)으로, 시장 컨센서스(영업이익 491억원)를 하회 메탈 가격 래깅과 환율로 인한 ASP 상승과 하이니켈 제품의 견조한 출하량 증가로 매출은 전분기 대비 큰 폭으로 증가. 주요 고객사인 Tesla의 유럽과 중국 지역 수요 확대로 구지 1·2공장이 풀가동 수준으로 가동되고 있으며, 46파이용 양극재 비중도 하이니켈 제품의 약 9% 수준까지 상승 그러나 가동률 개선에도 불구하고 리튬 가격 하락에 따

👍10👎2

6 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC411 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cjdbj

[미래에셋 김철중] 2차전지/ESS : 사야하는 10가지 이유 (1) 하반기 돌아가면서 나올 수주 - 어제 기사화된 포스코퓨처엠의 수주 건의 본질은 개별 기업의 변수보다 산업 전체적인 상황 반영된 결과 <작년 7월 OBBBA로 인한 북미 ESS 탈 중국 가속(적격 소재 Shortage), 중국 소재사들의 가격 인상 요구> - 업체 별로 돌아가며 하반기 북미 ESS 관련 수주 모멤텀 발생 빈번할 것 - IAA로 인한 유럽 OEM 향 수주 사이클도 동시에 진행될 것(각형 LFP) - 22~23년 IRA로 인한 수주 사이클과 비교 시, 1) 건 당 규모는 작으나, 2) 수주 건의 빈도는 높을 것 - 특히, 북미 ESS의 경우 작년 하반기 수주 프로젝트 대비 개별 수주 건의 규모와 시계열이 확장될 것으로 판단(넥스테라에너지 30년-32년

5👍1

6 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC622 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/018/0006346566?sid=101

🕊6

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC566 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @automiraePhoto

[7월 유럽 주요국 BEV 판매] 미래에셋 자동차 김진석 t.me/automirae 7월 7개국 +57%YoY (1월 +15%, 2월 +23%) (3월 +46%, 4월 +43%) (5월 +44%, 6월 +55%) * 유럽 전체 6월은 +51% 독일: 78,609대 (+62%) 프랑스: 44,378대 (+127%) 영국: 43,106대 (+45%) 스페인: 10,722 (+23%) 노르웨이: 9,379대 (+1%) 스웨덴: 7,967대 (+29%) 이탈리아: 7,368대 (+25%) 위 데이터는 각국 협회 기준. 주요 7개국의 유럽 전체 BEV 판매 비중은 약 70% 수준으로 증가율이 유사함. ACEA (유럽협회) 출처 7월 유럽 전체 BEV 판매는 8월 25일 전후 발표될 예정

4

6 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

비밀유지조항(NDA)으로 인해 고객사 명명이 공식 보도에 명 시되지는 않았으나, 시장에서는 이 "국내 유력 배터리사"의 실 체가 삼성SDI일 것으로 보고 있습니다. 삼성SDI의 북미 ESS 완판 스케줄: 삼성SDI는 미국 인디애나 주 합작공장(SPE)의 라인을 전환하여 2026년 하반기 ~2027년부터 북미 ESS용 LFP 배터리를 본격 양산할 계획이 며, 이미 2029년 물량까지 완판되었습니다. 타임라인의 완벽한 일치: 삼성SDI의 북미 LFP ESS 양산 시점 (2027년 초)과 포스코퓨처엠의 LFP 5만 톤/19만 톤 공급 타 임라인(2027~2032년)이 톱니바퀴처럼 딱 맞아떨어집니다. 미국 FEOC(해외우려기관) 규제 회피: 미국 IRA 및 FEOC 규 제로 인해 중국산 LFP 양극재를 미국 ESS에 쓰는 것이 전면 금지되었습니

4

6 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC767 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

이정도 물량(연 3만톤) 이면 LG엔솔이려나요

👍13

6 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC553 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cjdbj

https://kpenews.com/ViewM.aspx?No=4177127

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @battermanyo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,075,249 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“배터리맨 일렉허니” (@battermanyo), 2,890 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/battermanyo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.