Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트
@maddingStock
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,387subscribers
+195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001619402703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maddingStock |
| Created | 4 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maddingStock |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 20,387 | -24 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 20,411 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 20,422 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 20,440 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 20,437 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 20,438 | +20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 20,418 | +38 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 20,380 | +33 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 20,347 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 20,339 | +17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:43 | 20,322 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 20,309 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 20,311 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 20,309 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 20,302 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 20,290 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 20,293 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 20,294 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 20,296 | +8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 20,288 | first reading |
Engagement
407 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.33%
- avg views ÷ 20,387 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,900
- 64 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.288%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 64
- of 407 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 407 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 121,776 |
| Reactions total | 310 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 34s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,031 reactions across 274 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 968 | 47.7% | |
| 👍 | 687 | 33.8% | |
| 😡 | 82 | 4.04% | |
| 😭 | 59 | 2.90% | |
| 👏 | 54 | 2.66% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 1.62% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 1.62% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 1.48% | |
| 🤔 | 27 | 1.33% | |
| 😱 | 21 | 1.03% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 0.492% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.443% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 0.295% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.246% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.148% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 0.148% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.049% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 407 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,064 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 407 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📌 오늘의 스탁이지 - https://stockeasy.intellio.kr 업데이트: 9월 3일 09:15
9월 3일 09시10분 주도테마 주도주(등락률) 📌 스탁이지 - https://stockeasy.intellio.kr
👍1
9월 3일 08시30분 주도테마 주도주(등락률) 📌 스탁이지 - https://stockeasy.intellio.kr
👍2
[장전브리핑] 미 증시 상승과 원·달러 급락에 국내 증시 반등 가능성 • 뉴욕증시 3대 지수 상승 마감. 기술주 강세는 국내 반도체·IT 대형주(삼성전자, SK하이닉스) 외국인 수급 개선 기대. • 원·달러 환율 15.94원 급락. 외국인 자금 이탈 압력 완화로 2차전지(LG에너지솔루션) 등 낙폭 과대 종목 반등 시도 가능성. • VIX 공포지수 하락, 시장 불안 완화. 국내 증시 시초가 형성에 긍정적 요인. • WTI 유가 소폭 하락, 국제 금 가격 상승. 조선·해운주는 유가 안정과 환율 하락 효과 상충으로 중립적 흐름 예상. 🔗 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/briefing/260
👍1
📊 전일 대량매매(블록딜) 비율순 TOP 20 2026-09-03
[美증시 마감] 헬스케어·에너지 주도의 신고가 우위 속 단기 저항 공방 • 헬스케어·에너지 신고가 우위 속 지수 상승. 고유가·고금리 환경 속 방어적 성장주 선별 강세. • JNJ, CVX 등 대형 헬스케어·에너지 종목 신고가 경신. 안정적 현금흐름과 방어적 성장력 부각. • DE, MUFG 등 산업재·금융 대형주도 상승세. 설비 투자 모멘텀 및 금리 환경 적응 기대감. • 한국 영향: 정유, 방어주, 금융지주 등 고배당·저PBR 섹터에 우호적. 경기민감주는 종목별 차별화 심화. 🔗 https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/us/briefing
❤1
https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/us
❤3
반도체 관련주들 26년 (E) EPS 성장 예상 상위순 (애널리스트 컨센 3M 평균 기준) https://stockeasy.intellio.kr/stock-analysis/screener
❤11👍1😡1
알파 아이디어의 소멸 https://blog.naver.com/redbirdstock/224398802828
❤3😡1
MDB 실발 이후 에프터 마켓에서 14% 이상 하락 실적 하이라이트 총 매출: $772M(전년 동기 대비 +30% 성장, FY24 이후 최고 분기 성장률) Atlas 매출: 전년 동기 대비 약 +29% 성장 (5분기 연속 약 29% 성장, 컨센서스 상회) EA 및 기타 매출: 전년 동기 대비 +36% 성장 (3년 내 최고 실적) Non-GAAP 영업이익: $186M, 영업이익률 24% (전년 동기 15%) Non-GAAP 주당순이익(EPS): $1.90 (전년 동기 $1.00) 고객 지표: 총 고객 수 70.6천 개사 (순증 2.9천 개사로 역대 최다 분기 순증), ARR $100천 이상 고객 약 3천 개사(전년비 +17%), 순 ARR 확장률 122% 가이던스 3분기 가이던스: 총 매출: $756M ~ $761M (전년비 +20% ~ +…
❤5😱1
📈 2026년 09월 02일 ADR 🔵 KOSPI ADR 08/27 : 141.3% 08/28 : 142.6% 08/31 : 130.4% 09/01 : 129.7% 09/02 : 111.9% 🟢 KOSDAQ ADR 08/27 : 133.0% 08/28 : 137.2% 08/31 : 123.8% 09/01 : 116.9% 09/02 : 101.6% 💡 ADR(Advance-Decline Ratio): 하락 종목 수 대비 상승 종목 수의 비율 100% 기준선을 중심으로 시장 강세/약세/과매수/과매도를 판단할 수 있습니다. 📌 텔레그램 - https://t.me/maddingStock 📌 스탁이지 - https://stockeasy.intellio.kr
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 407 posts we hold for @maddingStock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@nje2e · 8,47824 posts가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,6276 posts최신특허 TV 공부방(김종승 변리사)
@recentpatent · 2,5614 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,7322 posts한걸음_적자생존 기록실
@helpmeonestep · 12,1622 posts하니베어의 공부방
@honeybearinvest · 1,4042 postsBrain and Body Research
@Brain_And_Body_Research · 34,9741 post파이어🔥
@FireStockStudy · 2,3411 post스파르탄 리서치
@SpartanResearch · 5541 post신호와소음 (투자)
@StudyHODL · 2,5921 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,1311 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7061 post재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,1591 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3151 post메모장
@idea_memo · 8,8531 post잠실개미&10X’s N.E.R.D.S
@jake8lee · 17,2561 postLattice Research
@latticeresearch · 1,3831 post파하의 아카이빙 노트
@paranhanl20 · 3,4111 post감단투자
@sim_the_best · 1,8781 post소투
@small_stock · 9,0171 post오를수도 있고
@updownstock · 871 post쩜상리서치
@upper_limit_price · 8,0031 post야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,1071 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@EarlyStock1 · 24,402
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@pikachu_aje · 25,217
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스탁이지 - AI 투자 어시스턴트” (@maddingStock), 20,387 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maddingStock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.