Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IH Research

@ihresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,380subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001674521669
TypeChannel
Username@ihresearch
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ihresearch

Growth

8,3678,3858,3766 August 2026 — 8,367 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,372 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,385 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,380 subscribers8,3806 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,364–8,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:038,380-5
9 Aug 2026, 18:128,385+13
7 Aug 2026, 01:508,372+5
6 Aug 2026, 10:528,367first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 8,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,500
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.356%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held49 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total122,270
Reactions total406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

406 reactions across 44 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23056.7%
👍10124.9%
🙏4110.1%
🔥338.13%
👏10.246%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,040 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

어쨌든 무사히 넘어갔습니다. 이제 10년물 국채 입찰만 잘 넘어가면 되겠네요.

13🙏2

12 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2년물은 소폭 반등하네요. 그런데 에너지 가격이 왜 마이너스인지?ㅎ 유가는 7월이 높았는데..

12 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,580 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

CPI는 그냥 부합입니다. 세부데이터를 살펴봐야겠네요.

9

12 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,900 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

이제 안할수도 없겠는데? https://news.ikbc.co.kr/article/view/kbc202608120035

3🔥3👍1

12 Aug 2026, 02:36 UTC≈2,500 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

진짜 변동성 줄어든거 맞아요?

🔥12🙏2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC≈2,290 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

국장은 타코할지 말지 재료지만 이미 어디선가는 사고가 나고 있습니다. 다만 이 주제는 국장보다는 미장에서 투자하시는게 더 직관적이긴 합니다.

3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,690 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @insidertrackingPhoto

블룸버그에 따르면 유럽 천연가스 가격이 중동 분쟁 발발 이후 최고 수준에 빠르게 근접 중. 호르무즈 해협이 LNG 운송에 계속 폐쇄되면서 전 세계 공급량의 약 20%가 제한되고 있으며, 노르웨이 오르멘 랑에 가스전의 유지보수 기간도 2027년 2월까지 연장.

2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC≈2,150 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

요새 알루미늄 가격도 반등중이고 구리 가격은 다시 신고가 try

👍6

11 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,940 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"전쟁을 끝내고 동결자금을 풀지 않으면 개방은 턱도 없다." 혁명수비대 사령관 출신으로 최근 이란 최고국가안보회의(SNSC)의 수장인 사무총장 자리에 오른 모흐센 레자이가 11일(현지시간) 미국이 전쟁을 끝내고 동결된 이란 자금을 풀지 않으면 호르무즈 해협을 개방하지 않겠다고 경고했다. https://www.getnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=877650&sicode=01

🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,230 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

달러기준으로보면 비슷할수도 있는데 어쨌든 대만하고 명목상 메모리 수익률은 격차가 벌어졌네요. 그런데 시장 참여자수는 줄어들면서 거래대금은 줄어들고 남은 참여자들은 신용을 써서 거래규모를 늘리고 있습니다. 소위 선수들만 남아서 섹터 로테이션 빠르게 돌리고 있는 장세입니다.

14🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,580 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbong_ttaPhoto

예탁금 100조 신용은 미친듯이 증가

6🔥2👏1

11 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,020 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JstockclassPhoto

코스피 변동성 하락 → 대만 메모리와 벌어진 격차를 좁혀갈것으로 예상 (JPM)

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @ihresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 317,161 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IH Research” (@ihresearch), 8,380 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.