코인 정보 큐레이션 채널입니다.
매수 추천이 아닌 정보 제공 목적입니다
에어드랍, AI 가이드 : https://cryptomage-mageos.pages.dev/
텔레그램 : https://t.me/cryptocurrencymage
유튜브 : https://www.youtube.com/@cryptocurrencymage/videos
링크트리 : https://linktr.ee/cryptomage777
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,255–9,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:12
9,258
-5
9 Aug 2026, 12:36
9,263
-12
6 Aug 2026, 16:30
9,275
+8
6 Aug 2026, 03:03
9,267
first reading
Engagement
120 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.61%
avg views ÷ 9,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
334
120 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.649%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
120
of 120 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 58 of 120 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
120 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
40,054
Reactions total
113
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,100
Videos
≈576
Links
≈11,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
2m 02s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 46 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
76
80.9%
👍
9
9.57%
🤔
3
3.19%
🥰
3
3.19%
👏
2
2.13%
🤯
1
1.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥇차마스가 말하는 투자와 부의 구조 source
1. 투자
- 투자 수익은 결국 상대방의 실수와 내 실수의 차이에서 발생함
- 타인의 판단은 통제할 수 없지만, 내 오류율과 포지션 크기, 보유 기간은 통제할 수 있음
- 실패를 피하려고 완벽한 정보를 기다리면 이미 기회가 사라짐
- 작은 규모로 먼저 베팅하고, 결과를 통해 논리를 수정한 뒤 확신이 높아질수록 자본을 확대하는 방식이 유리
- 투자자는 대체로 모멘텀 → 현금흐름 → 거시·지정학 → 투자 철학의 순서로 진화함. 최상위 투자자의 엣지는 특정 종목을 잘 맞히는 능력이 아니라, 반복 가능한 철학과 시스템
- 차마스가 제시한 Social Capital의 성과 구조는 지난 11년간 승자에서 번 돈과 패자에서 잃은 돈의 비율이 23대 1이었다는 것
- 핵심은 높은 적중률이 아니라, 틀렸을 때…
그록봇도 Claude 에서 CDP 로 제어가 가능하네요.
코덱스도 당연히 가능할 것 같고요.
봇작업은 그록 분류기 못 믿어서 안 시킬거고
서버에 상주하는 개념이라 24 시간 리서치 돌려놓고 새로운 정보 수집·정리하는 용도로 활용해도 꽤 괜찮을 듯합니다.
CDP제어 워크플로만 잘깎으면 활용도가 꽤나 많은듯 (권한은 너무 주지 마세요)
💥역대급 콜라보…Minara AI × 《나 혼자만 레벨업 on ICE》 VIP 이벤트
Minara AI와 함께 트레이딩 실력을 레벨업하고, 얼음 위에서 펼쳐지는 새로운 전설을 VIP석에서 만나보세요!
🎁경품 안내
• 《나 혼자만 레벨업 on ICE》 VIP 좌석(약 13만 원 상당) 총 50매
• 당첨자 1인당 1매 제공
• 공연 일시: 8월 15일 오후 7시 / 8월 16일 오후 7시
※ 관람 날짜는 무작위로 배정되며, 배정 후 선택 및 변경이 불가능합니다.
🗓이벤트 참여 기간
• 8월 12일 ~ 8월 14일 오전 10시(KST) 마감
🏆퀘스트 참여 방법
1. 이벤트 전용 링크를 통해 Minara AI 가입하기
※ 기존 회원은 신규 가입 없이 참여할 수 있습니다.
2. 이벤트 기간 내 Minara AI에서 트레이딩 1회 이상…
✔️로빈후드 체인, 앞으로 볼 만한 NFT 민팅 리스트
트위터에 돌아다니는 내용인데, 나름 정리 잘된거 같아 공유해봅니다.
[트위터 핸들링크]
High Signal
@boldpfps — Bold가 준비 중인 PFP NFT 컬렉션
@OranguNation — @ExoticRaccoon이 준비 중인 NFT 프로젝트
@biwlsxyz — 손그림 기반 아트 NFT
Others
@alphasimpsRH — Alpha Simps / 총 3,333개
@Hoodbirds_ — Hoodbirds / 총 4,500개 / 무료 민팅
@KittiHoodpix — KittiHood / 수량 미정
@NumbersOnRobin — Numbers on Robinhood / 총 10,000개 / 무료 민팅
@GhostCatsRH — GhostCats / G-Cats …
실제로 다음 AI가 갈곳이 어딘가에 대해서 꾸준히 고민해보고 있는데, 로보틱스 아니면 우주라는 섹터가 될 것 같고 둘을 조금 다른 시각으로 보고 있음.
로보틱스는 이제 단순히 “사람처럼 움직이는 로봇”이라는 꿈을 파는 단계에서, 실제 현장에서 얼마나 경제성이 나오는지를 검증하는 단계로 넘어가는 것 같음.
특히 이것은 생산라인을 가지고 있는 회사들의 전환으로 인해 가속화 된다고 생각하는데, 자동차 회사들은 이미 공장 라인과 반복 공정을 가지고 있는 상태. 그래서 로봇을 투입한 뒤 작업 성공률, 사이클타임, 가동률, 사람의 개입 횟수, 불량률, 설치비 회수 기간 같은 지표를 기존 공정과 바로 비교할 수 있음.
예를 들어 어느 공장에서 로봇 10대를 투입했더니 생산성이 얼마나 개선됐다는 숫자가 나오고, 그게 100대·1,000대로 확장되기 시…
📌 Arc Network - 포인트 가치에 대한 시나리오
Circle이 만드는 Layer 1 코인 Arc Network의 포인트 가치에 대하여 시나리오를 좀 작성해 봤습니다. 기반 시나리오는 메인넷 연기 없이 9월 16일에 런칭되는것을 기반으로 생각해봤습니다.
- 사전정보 및 가정
투자자 : 블랙락, 코인베이스, A16Z, Ark, SBI, APOLLO, Janus Henderson
투자금 : 220M USD
투자 밸류 : 3B USD
일일 방문자 : 5500명
일일 평균 포인트 획득 : 3 / 포인트 총발행량 : 1천만
에어드랍중 포인트 유저 할당 : 50%
각종 사례와 클레리티법안의 내용을 비추어 보아 에어드랍은 총 발행량의 7~15%(약 10%)로 추정합니다.
✔️ 매각시점 FDV별 포인트당 가치
1. 3B : 포인트당 약 10달러…
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @cryptocurrencymage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 29,233 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptocurrencymage named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@fantasy_top_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@goblintown named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@polymarket named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토메이지” (@cryptocurrencymage), 9,258 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocurrencymage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
