24시간 폰즈 수익 근황 펌프랑 얼마 차이나지 않는 1.05M

Channel
라오니()
@Raoni1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,980subscribers
-335 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001259934336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Raoni1 |
| Created | 2 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Raoni1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 14,980 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 15,011 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 15,021 | -32 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 15,053 | -36 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 15,089 | -40 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 15,129 | -19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 15,148 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 15,154 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 15,161 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 15,173 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 15,184 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 15,190 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 15,197 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 15,211 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 15,210 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 15,211 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 15,215 | -38 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 15,253 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 15,259 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 15,252 | first reading |
Engagement
442 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 14,980 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,560
- 95 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.165%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 95
- of 442 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 442 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 147,905 |
| Reactions total | 119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 07s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
841 reactions across 174 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 417 | 49.6% | |
| 🤯 | 156 | 18.5% | |
| 👍 | 152 | 18.1% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 2.14% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.832% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 442 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 896 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 442 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
로빈후드 체인에서, 현재 생산적인걸로 제일 적합한게 pons 아닌가 싶은데?? 수익 잘나오고 바이백 잘하고, 나머지는 그냥 밈코 도박 기대감으로 오르는거고, 결국 돈버는건 pons 하나밖에 없지 않은가 싶음.
많이 벌어서 바이백, 많이 벌어서 바이백. 이런게 항상 최고지.....
이거 폰스라고 읽어야함? 폰즈라고 읽어야함?
폰즈는 또다시 ath 로빈후드 대장은 폰드인듯.
❤1
이분 청문회 언제하지요...??? 시청율 진짜 장난아니겟네....
Signed Raoni
기가 dex라는 자영업수준의 dex도 있는데, TVL 낮아서 찐소액으로 해야함.
Signed Raoni
미쳐버린 Pons의 수수료 수익 하루 5.9M 규모의 수수료가 발생했습니다.
❤5
Signed Raoni
사용감 자체는 람세스가 제일 좋은거 같고, 계산기 두들기면서, 효율충 할려면 up으로 가는게 맞고, 그냥 안전빵 원하면 유니스왑.
Signed Raoni
로빈후드에서 지금 덱스 파밍을 할만한 곳은 3군데임 유니스왑, 람세스, 업 유니스왑 장점 여기 망하면 온체인 망하는거기 떄문에, 제일 안정감있게 파밍할수 있음. 단점 프로토콜수수료 다른애들보다 높아서, apr이 좀 낮음. 프론트 ui랑 lp 투입하는게 복잡하고 사용하기 불편함. 람세스 장점 ui 사용감이 최고임. 예전부터 여기보다 쓰기좋고 보기좋게 만든 33dex는 없는거 같음. 프로토콜 fee도 적게 가져가서 apr이 높게나옴. 자체 스왑도, 어그리게이터의 어그리게이터라서 쓰기 편함 단점 중소 dex라는 불안감이 있어서, 큰돈을 박기에는 항상 두려움. 업 장점 로빈후드에서는 유일하게 스테이킹 이미션을 제대로 지원하는 33dex. 제대로 활용하면 제대로 뽑아먹을수 있음. up 토크노믹스가 기존 33dex 와 다르게 거래량이 줄면 배출량…
❤1
Signed Raoni
로빈후드발 디파이붐이 온거 같음. 폰즈 같은거 범위 좁혀서 박으면, apr 무지하게 잘나옴. 전투파머들 돌격하라~!!!
❤2
Signed Raoni
국내도 그냥 스포츠토토 온체인에 올리고, 외국 투기자본 유치 빨리하죠?? 수익금으로 청년주택 마구마구 지어버립시다.
Signed Raoni
Showing the 12 most recent of 442 posts we hold for @Raoni1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@minchoisfuture · 15,11910 posts아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,9906 posts매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,7346 posts크립토스쿨 다오🦅
@CRYPTOSCH00L · 12,6425 posts채저시급 김으악ㅠ
@Ugh_HH · 10,0465 posts기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,8965 posts가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,6274 posts이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,4694 posts잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 26,0523 posts젬하 크립토(GemHive)🦄 경제적 자유 이루기
@GemHive · 24,2272 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,9592 posts코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 18,0532 posts큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,2132 posts싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,4592 posts종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 8,8012 posts스타돔나이트쌍코피
@nurungE · 1502 postsAnoma Korea
@AnomaKorea · 1,5821 post변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,9731 post바밀이야 bamilirya
@Bananamilkrich · 8,7691 post007 (NFA)
@CODE007_KR · 1,3551 post사망토큰
@Die_Coinz · 1,3121 postGMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,3091 post꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,2471 post쉬었음청년 집가고싶다
@Iwanttogohome09 · 5,7891 post저스트코인
@JUSTCRYT · 2,9691 post디젠걸
@KDegengirl · 9091 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,5891 postBuy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,3971 post가봉의 디파이는 다큰낙타
@cctgavong · 2,8481 post체인니즈 뉴스채널(News)
@chainiz_news · 1491 post피터팬의 유익한 정보 채널
@coinnewsshop · 6,6501 post크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,0891 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,1311 post일기장
@dlfrlwkd · 211 post똥마려
@dongmaryeo · 9101 post돈미새 윾수
@eksoo_announce · 1,3831 post불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,2151 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7061 post꿀통(HONEYBOTTLE)
@honeybottlenft · 2,4621 postHoneybox 허니박스코인
@honeyboxcoin · 261 postTrends & Tips 😎⚡️
@honeylifetip · 9,2981 post크립토 꿀쥐🐭
@honeymouse1003 · 11,8241 post존토방
@investlikejohn · 5,0711 post그래도 해야지 어떡해
@j_u_s_t_d_o_i_t_0 · 1,5441 post멘탈관리소
@jaysonchart · 1,1171 post진민트와 재테크방
@junplus1248 · 3931 postDegen Guy
@justdegenguy · 10,4151 postWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 22,5511 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,9597 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1196 posts폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,5895 postsCEK'S NOTE
@shotgunforu · 9422 posts신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,8042 postsNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,2091 postPASA 공지방
@PASACREW · 6,3741 postStable 한국 공식 공지방
@Stable_KR · 2,9931 post돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 5,9601 postBARO | 한국 크립토 인텔리전스
@baro_quest · 5621 post코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋♂️🦅
@coinboys · 15,4821 postManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 15,9401 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,8961 post마인부우의 크립토볼
@minebuu_cryptoball · 10,8131 postpeaq 한국 공지 채널
@peaq_KR · 1,3961 postStockHub (스톡허브) 뉴스
@stockhubkr · 3,0441 post타이거리서치 | Tiger Research Reports
@tiger_research · 1,9221 post🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,0811 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@telonews_kr · 23,90920 posts큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,2134 posts📣 코인랩픽 (CoinLabPick) 공지방
@Coin_LabPick · 4,6993 posts{News} In Crypto
@cryptonewsaggr · 7351 postDefi App 한국 공지방🇰🇷
@defidotapp_KR_Ann · 1,5521 post리도스
@Lithos_tel · 2,1621 post노드팍 크립토 성장기
@Node_Park · 311 postpeaq 한국 공지 채널
@peaq_KR · 1,3961 post세나 리서치
@ResearchSena · 13,0891 post거인의 어깨
@SellSeeShoulder · 4491 postTrader Hyun's crypto diary
@TraderHyun · 6,5631 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bitcoin_price · 56,32418 postsKii 한국 공지방
@official_kii_kr · 1,8184 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,9593 postsBARO | 한국 크립토 인텔리전스
@baro_quest · 5621 post코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋♂️🦅
@coinboys · 15,4821 post🇰🇷Mantle 맨틀 한국 커뮤니티
@Mantle_KR · 2,5731 postKii 한국 커뮤니티
@official_kii_krcommunity · 2,1221 postpeaq 한국 공지 채널
@peaq_KR · 1,3961 postProof of AMA(인증샷방)
@prooofama · 4,2251 postReboundX
@ReboundXnet · 2,2631 post타이거리서치 | Tiger Research Reports
@tiger_research · 1,9221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@airdr0p_lab · 20,589
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,670
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@jacktokencom · 419,887
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,748
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 21,207
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@blockmedia · 33,507
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“라오니()” (@Raoni1), 14,980 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Raoni1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.