쌉소리 말고 진짜 노트에도 썼던 일기장 내용은 이정도? 바보입장 금지 매실남 관찰일지 심리가 묻는 자산 무엇을 위한 자산 언급인가 하이닉스와 비슷했던 자산 진짜 개악필이지만 볼펜으로 종이에 쓰면서 정리해야 새겨지는 늙크크라 일기장 텔방에서도 쓰고, 노트에도 쓰는중. 나중에 도움이 될거라 믿어.
😁1

Channel
@jh_6598
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
10,304subscribers
+1,272 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002121770704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jh_6598 |
| Description | 하기 귀찮은걸 할수있게 해줍니다. 채팅방: https://t.me/chat_jong |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jh_6598 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 11 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jh_6598/10419 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC | @minchoisfuture/556413 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @minchoisfuture/559108 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC | @jh_6598/10497 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @minchoisfuture/559158 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC | @jh_6598/10499 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC | 1.00 | 16 minutes |
| @minchoisfuture/559449 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC | @jh_6598/10511 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 11:34 UTC | 1.00 | 15 minutes |
| @jh_6598/9255 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC | @airdr0p_lab/197486 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC | 1.00 | 60 minutes |
| @jh_6598/10419 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC | @airdr0p_lab/212383 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @minchoisfuture | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | this entry (12–5) |
| @airdr0p_lab | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 8 minutes | this entry (5–2) |
| @cryptocurrencymage | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | this entry (8–3) |
| @justdegenguy | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 6 minutes | @justdegenguy (11–6) |
| @Honeyofwhitesocks_2 | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 16 minutes | this entry (10–4) |
| @cybertruck666 | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 15 minutes | this entry (6–2) |
| @leedogin2 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 11 minutes | this entry (6–1) |
| @nftimagod | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 84 minutes | this entry (3–2) |
| @justicekingsman | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 10 minutes | @justicekingsman (5–1) |
| @lnsanecoin | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 minutes | @lnsanecoin (3–2) |
| @WeCryptoTogether | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 9 minutes | this entry (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 240 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 12:18 | 10,304 | -2 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:54 | 10,306 | -10 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:49 | 10,316 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 10,317 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:24 | 10,322 | +147 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:07 | 10,175 | -62 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 10,237 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:36 | 10,243 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:54 | 10,244 | +4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 10,240 | -61 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 10,301 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 10,302 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:00 | 10,311 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 10,315 | -80 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 10,395 | -19 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 10,414 | +33 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 10,381 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 10,402 | -98 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 10,500 | -104 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 10,604 | first reading |
450 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 185 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 450 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 156,729 |
| Reactions total | 148 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
353 reactions across 158 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 224 | 63.5% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 19.0% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 6.80% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.40% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.42% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.42% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.42% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.13% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.567% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.283% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 450 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 450 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 450 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 39 of 186 posts held from the last 30 days (21.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
쌉소리 말고 진짜 노트에도 썼던 일기장 내용은 이정도? 바보입장 금지 매실남 관찰일지 심리가 묻는 자산 무엇을 위한 자산 언급인가 하이닉스와 비슷했던 자산 진짜 개악필이지만 볼펜으로 종이에 쓰면서 정리해야 새겨지는 늙크크라 일기장 텔방에서도 쓰고, 노트에도 쓰는중. 나중에 도움이 될거라 믿어.
😁1
스테이블코인 공급량이 정말 채택을 보여주는 가장 좋은 지표일까? 원문에서는 Visa는 스테이블코인 정산 규모가 연환산 $25B를 넘었고, 연계 카드도 50개국에서 500만 장 이상 발급됐다고 밝힘. 그런데 이에 대해서 Tulip King은 기업들이 매번 이런 성장 수치를 발표하는 것과 달리, 왜 전체 스테이블코인 공급은 약 $300B에 머물러 있는지 질문함. Mason의 답변은 아직 스테이블코인 발행 수요의 상당 부분이 크립토 거래와 CEX 입금에서 나온다는 것. 시장이 부진하면서 거래소 관련 발행은 줄었지만, 결제·송금·카드처럼 거래소 밖 사용량은 늘고 있다는 이야기임. 여기에 Tulip King은 더 중요한 가설을 제시함. 은행과 카드 시스템에서는 최종 정산에 시간이 걸리기 때문에 각 참여자가 현금을 미리 보유해야 함. 반면 온체인에…
❤1
주문 속도 관련된 내용 외에도 Hyperliquid의 구조에 대해서 언급되는 글이 많이 보이는데, 그중에 가장 많은 주제가 read priority auction에 대한 내용임. read priority auction 는 비용을 지불한 참여자가 다른 사람의 주문 데이터를 먼저 받아볼 수 있는 기능인데, Hyperliquid는 3분마다 세 개의 독립적인 더치옥션을 열고, 낙찰자에게 다음 3분 동안 데이터 수신 우선권을 부여함. 공식 문서가 밝힌 효과는 슬롯당 약 20ms. 상위 슬롯을 확보한 마켓메이커는 다른 참여자보다 먼저 실행 전 주문을 포함한 트랜잭션 데이터를 받고, 그 사이 호가를 취소·수정하거나 다른 거래소에서 헤지할 수 있는 우위를 가지게 됨. 데이터 우위는 입찰 지갑이 아니라 지정한 IP에 귀속되는 구조로 다음과 같은 매커니즘…
Cursor가 최근 보안 사고의 전체 경로를 공개함. 공격은 Cursor 자체가 아니라 외부 AI 인프라 업체 Fireworks에서 노출된 접근키로 시작됨. 순서를 정리하면 1. Cursor가 Fireworks에 발급한 접근키 노출 2. 공격자가 학습용 읽기 전용 버킷에서 과거 Coding Agent trace 복사 3. 일부 trace에 삭제되지 않은 고객 API 키·자격증명 포함 4. 해당 키로 Cursor가 쓰던 일부 SaaS 도구와 비프로덕션 자료에 접근 5. 탈취한 Cursor 자격증명으로 마켓플레이스 캐시에 가짜 Claude Code 확장프로그램 배포 이후 공격자는 10월 29일 Cursor 확장프로그램 마켓플레이스에 악성 Anthropic.claude-code 2.1.312·2.1.313 버전을 올림. 약 11시간 동안 노출됐…
이더가격 하락에 따른 톰리의 BitMine이 가진 이더의 손실은 대략 -88.3억 달러, 원화기준 11.8조원 부근
1. 대충 젠슨황이 아시안들한테 칩 갓다판게 중국으로 다 새나갔다는 이야기 2. 중국쪽 ai 전부 엔비디아 칩 이용해서 개발했다고 뉴스 퍼지는중 이게 이 내용인듯
시장 요약 1. 대충 젠슨황이 아시안들한테 칩 갓다판게 중국으로 다 새나갔다는 이야기 2. 중국쪽 ai 전부 엔비디아 칩 이용해서 개발했다고 뉴스 퍼지는중 3. 엔비디아 CEO(임시) 바뀜, 백인 CEO됬으니 정부에서 중국으로 나가는 칩 규제 더 빡세게 할거임 4. 엔비디아 뉴 CEO(임시) 순환금융 싫어함 (이게 말이되나 싶긴함) 5. 연준 굴스비가 이란전쟁 해결되도 정제시설 병목생겨서 정제유 가격 안잡힌다는 발언 뇌피셜 엔비디아, 반도체쪽 하락으로 펀드들 증거금 마련한다고 금,은,채권,코인 등 팔아치움, 유동성 이슈가 있다고 생각 아무튼 시장에 도움이 되는 내용이 하나도 없다..
❤1
델파이 출신 That1618guy가 만든 KNTQ 토큰 burn을 실시간 추적하는 대시보드 현재 burn 대기 중인 KNTQ는 약 34만 6천 개(약 10만 3천 달러)이며, 이미 번된 양은 1,301 KNTQ sequencer 수수료 절반과 Ascend burn treasury를 체인에서 직접 읽어 업데이트 https://x.com/that1618guy/status/2121268630432395359
스테이블코인 공급량, 2022년 6월 이후 최대 30일간 감소 – 링크 Glassnode의 데이터에 따르면, 주요 스테이블코인 공급량이 11월 9일까지 30일 동안 약 142억 달러 감소했는데, 이는 2022년 중반 이후 가장 큰 감소폭입니다. USDT 또한 1달러 기준 가격보다 약간 낮은 수준에서 거래되고 있습니다. 자본이 암호화폐 시장 내에서 순환하는 것이 아니라, 달러로 전환되는 경향을 보이며, 단기적인 반등을 위한 유동성을 감소시키고 있습니다.
👍1
Hyperliquid에서 고부하 시 취소 주문이 이후에 서명된 주문에 밀리는 문제가 있었는데, 팀이 빠르게 인지하고 수정한 상태. 추가로 현재 공개된 데이터에 따르면 기존 주문을 수정하는 것보다, 취소하고 새로운 주문을 하는게 더 빠른 상황. 하리는 이런식으로 직접 팀이 아니더라도 데이터 검증이 되다보니 긍정적인 피드백 루프가 작동하는것 같네요. 굿굿인듯! https://x.com/pejisdev/status/2120983799357936090
❤2👍1
코인베이스는 실물 카드팩 시스템 이름을 Coinbase Collect라고 정하고 Collector Crypt와 파트너십을 공개했네요. Collector Crypt의 경우 카드를 수집, 가격 책정, 진위 확인 및 보관하고, 재판매 및 배송을 처리하는 역할 https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/trading-and-funding/collect/intro
👍1
호기심과 낙관주의는 크립토에서 가질 수 있는 가장 큰 강점 중 두 가지야. 호기심을 유지하고 낙관적인 태도를 갖는 건 끊임없는 싸움이야. 우리 모두 게으른 놈들이니까 새로운 걸 시도하고 싶어 하지 않잖아. 2023년 여름으로 돌아가 보자. 우리는 Blur 농부들로서 포인트 메타에 아주 일찍 뛰어들었어. 그런데 친구가 Hyperliquid를 다음 유망한 농장으로 추천해줬을 때, 나는 그냥 perp DEX 메타에 뛰어드는 게 너무 귀찮아서 포기했지. 자본과 기술적 스킬이 있어서 완전히 죽일 수 있었을 텐데, 정말 최악의 실수였어. 게으른 새끼가 되지 마. 새로운 걸 시도해봐. https://x.com/Cbb0fe/status/2121201856495947814
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 450 posts we hold for @jh_6598. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@jh_6598 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 54 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“종명이의 딸깍” (@jh_6598), 10,304 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jh_6598.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.