Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Followin 속보

Channel

Followin 속보

@followin_ko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,660subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002081650642
TypeChannel
Username@followin_ko
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/followin_ko

Growth

3,6583,6663,6626 August 2026 — 3,666 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,666 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,664 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,659 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,658 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,660 subscribers3,6606 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,657–3,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:063,660+2
12 Aug 2026, 14:543,658-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:013,659-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:133,664-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:333,666no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:373,666first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.36%
avg views ÷ 3,660 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
47
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held47 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,935
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026

왓쳐그루(WatcherGuru) 메시지: 트럼프 미디어, crypto․com과의 암호화폐 거래 계획 취소 —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC51 viewsread 7 August 2026

AggrNews 뉴스, 트럼프 미디어, HTTPS://T.CO/SFKKT7QZUO 거래 폐기 및 핵융합 에너지 합병으로의 전환, 신임 CEO 전략 개편: Axios —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026

미국의 3대 주요 주식 지수는 모두 상승 마감했으며, COIN 지수는 5.12% 이상 상승했습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC457 viewsread 7 August 2026

분석: 비트코인이 새로운 상승 사이클에 진입했을 가능성이 있으며, 중요한 저점이 이미 형성되었을 수도 있습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC104 viewsread 7 August 2026

미국 증시에 상장된 광학 모듈 주식들이 상승세를 이어갔으며, COHR은 장중 16% 이상 급등했습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026

지난 24시간 동안 전체 네트워크에서 총 1억 9300만 달러 규모의 포지션이 청산되었으며, 그중 공매도 포지션이 1억 1100만 달러를 차지했습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC105 viewsread 7 August 2026

갤럭시 리서치: 콜드카드(Coldcard) 사건으로 인한 손실액이 1억 3천만 달러를 넘어섰을 가능성이 있으며, 여러 공격자가 동시에 취약점을 악용했을 수 있다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC146 viewsread 7 August 2026

SpaceX 주가는 장중 11% 이상 급등하여 현재 127.96달러에 거래되고 있습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC138 viewsread 7 August 2026

SpaceX 주가는 약 8.5% 상승하여 현재 약 125달러에 거래되고 있습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC140 viewsread 7 August 2026

미국 증시에 상장된 스토리지 관련 주식들이 추가 하락세를 보였으며, 시게이트 테크놀로지는 10% 하락했습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC160 viewsread 7 August 2026

이틀 전 비트코인을 40배나 숏(Short) 고래 투자자는 포지션을 줄일 수밖에 없었고, 이미 154만 달러의 손실을 입었습니다. —🔗link

7 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC156 viewsread 7 August 2026

클라우드플레어 주가는 2분기 매출이 전년 동기 대비 36% 증가하고 연간 실적 전망치를 상향 조정했다는 발표 이후 장 초반 12% 이상 급등했습니다. —🔗link

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @followin_ko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 119,610 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Followin 속보” (@followin_ko), 3,660 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/followin_ko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.