바닥에 계신건 많이봤는데 이 바닥에도 계실줄은 몰랐어요
🔥4
Signed sayyes

Channel
@bitethebulletkr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,588subscribers
+504 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002083348480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitethebulletkr |
| Description | get rich or die tryin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitethebulletkr |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 9,588 | -30 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:48 | 9,618 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:04 | 9,628 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 9,643 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 9,652 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 9,670 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 9,681 | -36 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 9,717 | -32 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 9,749 | -64 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 9,813 | -177 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 9,990 | +290 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 9,700 | +684 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 9,016 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 9,031 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 9,033 | +24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:14 | 9,009 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 9,017 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 9,031 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 9,037 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 9,047 | first reading |
79 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (6 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 64,286 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
207 reactions across 49 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 163 | 78.7% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.38% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.966% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.483% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.483% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.483% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (48.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
바닥에 계신건 많이봤는데 이 바닥에도 계실줄은 몰랐어요
🔥4
Signed sayyes
아오이 소라는 꾸준히 밈코 빌드업 중인듯
Signed sayyes
거래량 터지는 종목 초반에 잡고 thesis 잘 작성하면 크리에이터 리워드 짭짤하게 들어오는데 이벤트로 x2까지 해주니까, Elysium에 컨빅션이 있으면 한번 써보시는것도~
Signed sayyes
Robinhood 체인 주요 토큰들 고점대비 평균 -90% 도달 vlad가 버튼 눌러주길 기다리다가 이제는 숨도 안쉬어짐..
Signed sayyes
1.fomo에서 토큰을 평균 30일 이상 보유한 경우 (x5 부스트) 2. fomo 클랜에 소속된 회원 (x2 부스트) 3. fomo에서 토큰을 평균 5일 이상 보유한 경우(x1 부스트) Umia에서 진행한 slop cash 세일에 fomo 유저를 위한 부스트가 있었는데, fomo팀에 확인해보니 따로 협업 같은건 아니고 Umia에서 자체적으로 진행한거라네요. 오히려 더 좋은듯? Umia 홀더를 위한 베네핏이기때문에 slop cash의 흥망이 중요할거같은데, 그래도 조건이 까다로운건 아니니까 향후 참여 계획이 있다면 소액으로라도 fomo작 해두면 좋을듯
❤2
Signed sayyes
https://n.news.naver.com/article/011/0004679457 22년에도 이런일이 있었는데, 미래에셋증권, 하나증권, 현대차증권 등: 신용융자 담보비율을 기존 140% -> 130% 적용 신한투자증권: 담보종목 등급(A~C 등급)에 따라 140% -> 130%~135%로 차등 인하 진짜 조금 낮춰주는 수준이라 큰 효과는 없을걸로 예상
❤2
Signed sayyes
? "성지순례 왔습니다"
❤1
Signed sayyes
$red 테더의 하드론(Hadron)이 레드스톤(RedStone)과 협력하여 토큰화된 자산의 가격 책정, 결제 및 유동성 인프라를 확장합니다 원문
Signed sayyes
$UNI랑 $ONDO는 잘버티는 것 같고, $WLFI $TRUMP $HYPE $AAVE는 비트코인 대비 상대강도가 낮은 모습. 정책 민감도 이거 반영되고있나?
❤1
Signed sayyes
$trump 크라임하고 갈줄 알았는데 바로 자살하는 중
Signed sayyes
밈 세상엔 정말 없는게 없구나 이것도 10월에 만들어진게 있었네
Signed sayyes
샘 알트만님... RAM이 너무 필요한 나머지 개명해버리셨습니다.
❤2
Signed sayyes
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @bitethebulletkr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @bitethebulletkr as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bite the bullet” (@bitethebulletkr), 9,588 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitethebulletkr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.