Channel
@x2emeta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,679subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596447012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @x2emeta |
| Created | 2 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/x2emeta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 3,679 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 3,688 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 3,693 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 3,694 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ 바이낸스, 코인베이스 크라켄에 이어 NFT 마켓플레이스 폐쇄 - 바이낸스가 7월 3일 중앙집중식 NFT 마켓플레이스를 종료하고 바이낸스 월렛으로 통합할 예정 - 코인베이스, 크라켄 등 주요 거래소들도 NFT 마켓플레이스 서비스를 잇따라 중단 중 - 2022년 NFT 거래량 50억 달러에서 2025년 5.5억 달러로 급락하며 CEX 기반 NFT 마켓플레이스 카테고리 사실상 붕괴 엄... 원문 #NFT #Binance
❤1
Signed JADEOKC
업비트(Upbit) 공지 솔스티스(SLX) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-06-01 11:45:04
Signed JADEOKC
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 헬륨(HNT) 원화 마켓 추가 2026-06-01 10:45:23
Signed JADEOKC
😀 선착순 빗썸 x 키움증권 랜덤 비트코인 이벤트 🎁 최대 100만원 비트코인 (선착순 3만명) 1️⃣ 빗썸앱으로 들어가서 쿠폰 코드를 입력해주시면 참여완료 2️⃣ 쿠폰 코드 = kiwoom ✅ 구독자 리리님께서 공유해주셧어요 🕗 ~ 선착순 3만명 ⭐️ 경품발송 : 08/07
Signed JADEOKC
링크 : https://brand.naver.com/unilever/shoppingstory/detail?id=5002771205
Signed JADEOKC
출처 : https://x.com/i/status/2059275260843663628
Signed JADEOKC
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 [입출금] 베이스(BASE) 네트워크 계열 가상자산 27종 입출금 일시 중지 안내 (05/28 오후 7시~) 2026-05-22 19:00:04
Signed JADEOKC
'바크X네고왕' 최대 65% - 주식회사 바크
Signed JADEOKC
[클래리티법 미 상원 은행위 마크업 통과] 클래리티법이 미국 상원 은행위원회 법안 심의 및 표결(마크업)을 통과했다. 마크업 과정에서는 클래리티법 세부 과정 수십 건 관련 토론과 표결이 이어졌다. 클래리티법은 향후 상원 농업위원회와의 관할 조율 및 통합 절차를 거쳐 상원 본회의 표결 단계로 넘어가게 된다. 앞서 공개된 클래리티법 수정안에는 △스테이블코인 보상은 일부 허용하되 예금 이자는 제한하고 △디파이 개발자를 보호하며 △증권거래위원회(SEC)나 상품선물거래위원회(CFTC) 등 연방 관할 기준을 명확히 하겠다는 내용 등이 포함됐다. 시장에서는 법안이 최종 통과될 경우 기관 자금 유입 확대와 ETF·토큰화 시장 성장에 영향을 줄 수 있다는 전망이 앞서 제기된 바 있다. https://coinness.com/news/1157321
Signed JADEOKC
미친 레전드 충격 꿀팁 ㄷㄷ
Signed JADEOKC
가상자산 과세폐지 청원링크 https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/4F91926BDD6A0BB4E064B49691C6967B 글 잘쓰셨네요. 저도 동참하겠습니다. 도와줘 친구덜아.
Signed JADEOKC
🔵 Virtuals 자체는 별개로 BASE와 한몸이 될 것 같은 느낌 BASE는 정체성을 아예 AI와 로보틱스, 그리고 결제를 위한레이어로 잡은 모양인데, BASE 공계만 가봐도 로보틱스와 AI에 대한내용이 거의 80%임. 사실 BASE에서 이와 관련된 역할을 모두 수행하는게 Virtuals임. AI에 의한 스테이블 코인 결제 90%가 BASE라면 그중 과반수 이상이 Virtual에서 일어남. 국장에서 삼전 하닉 빼면 안되듯이 Base에서 이제 Virtual은 빼면 안되는 존재인 느낌? 버추얼도 주체적으로 Base를 위한 로보틱스 해커톤을 열어 우수 팀들을 선별중이고, 로보틱스 레이어는 BASE라는 것에 지원사격을 날리는중.
Signed JADEOKC
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @x2emeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 989,122 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“메타부 스토리” (@x2emeta), 3,679 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x2emeta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.