Channel
@lilycoin_S2
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,276subscribers
-140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003167089822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lilycoin_S2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lilycoin_S2 |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 3,276 | -50 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 3,326 | -85 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 3,411 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 3,416 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,090 |
| Reactions total | 166 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
166 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 60.8% | |
| custom 5262485971655468699 | 33 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5413349854728439167 | 32 | 19.3% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 Builders Marketplace, 새로운 Starchild 모듈 추가! 이제 몇 분 만에 여러분의 Perp DEX에 개인 AI 에이전트를 붙일 수 있습니다. 트레이더는 거래 화면을 벗어나지 않고도 아래 기능들을 바로 이용할 수 있습니다: 🟣 포지션 분석 🟣 크로스체인 시장 리서치 🟣 Coinglass, CoinGecko, DefiLlama, DeBank, TwelveData, TAAPI 등 80개 이상의 스킬 DEX 안에서 거래와 AI 기반 시장 분석을 한 번에 이용해 보세요! 🖥 Builders Marketpalce
❤2
악 이날씨에 담요와 뜨아라니 누가 아아로 바꿔주세요🐹🐹
❤3
대부분의 경우 AI는 좋은 판단을 내리고도 마지막 단계에서 멈춥니다. 분석은 끝났지만, 실제 주문을 실행할 수 있는 연결이 없기 때문입니다. Orderly MCP는 그 빈 공간을 메웁니다. Claude·Codex·Starchild 같은 AI 에이전트가 오덜리의 거래 인프라와 연결되어 전략을 세우고, 필요한 작업을 실행할 수 있도록 합니다. 사람이 직접 여러 과정을 거쳐 실행하던 거래를, 이제 AI 에이전트가 하나의 흐름 안에서 이어갈 수 있습니다. 전략을 세우고, 포지션을 모니터링하고, 사용자가 설정한 조건에 따라 주문을 실행하는 자동화까지 하나의 흐름으로 연결됩니다. 여기에 Orderly One을 더하면 가능성은 더 넓어집니다. 나만의 금융 시장을 만들고, 주식·지수·원자재 등 RWA 시장까지 하나의 공유 유동성 인프라 위에서 운영할…
custom 54133498547284391674
Signed Tory
🌙Fraction AI 모의 트레이딩 상금이 무려 1만달러! 무지성 숏치고 있숩니다 ㅎㅎ 제 돈으로 하는게 아니다 보니 평소 못했던 무지성 숏을 후후 1등이 벌써 손익이 ㅎㄷㄷ 대회 일정 -8월 11일(화) 오전1시까지 🌙모의거래 하러 가기 1. 토너먼트 참여 클릭 2. AI 에이전트 최근 전적및 승률 확인 (AI가 롱 숏 중에 추천해줌) 3. 원하는 포지션 모의거래 클릭( 🌙참고 사항 -10개 포지션 동시 진행 가능 -TP/SL 설정 가능 -내 순위 바로 확인 가능 시간이 얼마 남지 않았는데 얼른 해봅시다! 1등이 4000달러 여러 포지션 다 무지성 숏 쳤다가 손실이 이미😂 흑흑 진득하게 소수로 밀고 가는게 좋을 것 같아요
custom 54133498547284391677
💙 새로운 토큰화 주식 SynFutures에 상장 🛒 $EBAY (eBay) – 글로벌 온라인 쇼핑, 중고거래 플랫폼 🎮 $GME (GameStop) – 2021년 밈주식 열풍의 상징이 된 게임 전문 유통업체 💬 $RDDT (Reddit) – 미국 최대 온라인 커뮤니티 플랫폼 🍔 $WEN (Wendy’s) – 미국 대표 햄버거 프랜차이즈 SynFutures에서는 60개 이상의 토큰화 주식을 Base 체인에서 온체인으로 자유롭게 거래할 수 있습니다. 신퓨처스 RWA 들어가기
❤4
봇한테 맡겨두고 여행갈까요? 💜 Orderly x Tread.fi NAS100 마켓메이킹 대회 자동화된 마켓메이킹 전략을 실행하고, NAS100 시장에 유동성을 공급하며 총 $5,000의 상금에 도전해 보세요 🟣총 상금: $5,000 🟣진행 기간: ~8월 16일 🟣보상 기준: 봇 가동 시간(Uptime) + 실제 체결 거래량 참여방법은 해당 트윗을 확인해 주세요 풀영상은 요기에! 응원 댓글 달아주시면 감사합니다❤️
custom 52624859716554686998❤3
Signed Tory
릴리와 토리의 코인 대박 일기🌙 pinned a video
🥺 초라한 릴튜브… 이벤트 유튜브 시청 후 SynFutures RWA 관련 글을 자유롭게 작성해주세요! 단 하루! 🥇 1등 (3명): 배민 1만 원권 🥈 2등 (20명): 커피 기프티콘 📌 참여 방법 1. 영상 시청 후 댓글달기 2. 릴리 글 인용 후 SynFutures RWA 관련 자유롭게 글 작성 3. 구글폼 (머리도 안감고 화장도 귀찮아서 거지꼴이지만 감안하고 봐주세여😂😂) 흑흑흑흑 으흑흐긓글 아이디어 부탁해용 읗그흐그 8/5 수요일 11:59pm까지
❤10custom 52624859716554686993custom 54133498547284391673
📣 Orderly x Tread.fi 마켓메이킹 대회 트레이딩에서 잠시 휴가가 필요하지 않으신가요? 그렇다면 Orderly와 Tread.fi의 마켓메이킹 대회에 참여해보세요. 🟣총 상금: $5,000 🟣진행 기간: 2026년 8월 3일 - 17일 🟣보상 기준: 봇 가동 시간(Uptime) + 실제 체결 거래량 몇 번의 클릭만으로 자동화된 마켓메이킹 봇을 세팅하고 보상을 받아가 보세요. 자세한 참여방법은 해당트윗을 참고해주세요!
❤4
Signed Tory
릴리와 토리의 코인 대박 일기🌙 pinned a photo
오늘은 토리의 생일🥳🩷💜🩵 같은 시기에 크립토 시장에 들어와 이것저것 함께하며 많은 경험을 했는데, 어느덧 각자 플젝에서 일도 하고 있고🙂 뭔가 정말 많은 일들이 후루룩 지나간 것 같아 새삼 시간이 참 빠르네요 🥳🩵 앞으로 더 성장하는 토리 기대해주세요오옹 항상 열심히 잘하는 예쁜 도토리~ 여러분도 토리 많이 축하해 주세요오옹🥳 (뽀야 말 잘들어야 한다🩵)
custom 526248597165546869920❤10custom 54133498547284391678
🎁 SynFutures 기습 이벤트 내일 아침 9시 비트코인 & 이더리움 가격을 맞혀라! 정답자에게 스타벅스 아아/치킨 증정 (비트 이더 동시 정답자에게 치킨을!) 비트 정답자는 스타벅스 아아 기간: 오늘 오후 11시까지 신퓨처스 채팅방에 작성 🎁참여 방법 신퓨처스 공지방 입장 후 1. 채팅방에 비트코인 예상 가격 작성 2. 비트코인 가격 흐름 or 시장에 관한 의견 작성 예시)비트:65,000 USDT 이더:1,800USDT 요즘은 전반적으로 시장 분위기가 ~~이렇고 매수세가 ~~해, ~~ 흐름이 이어지고 있어요. 비트 이더 ± 0.1% 오차범위 인정 USDT기준은 바이낸스입니다! 댓글 작성 후 캡쳐본 구글폼에 넣어주세영 [구글폼 작성]
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lilycoin_S2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 301,254 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lilycoin_S2 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“릴리와 토리의 코인 대박 일기🌙” (@lilycoin_S2), 3,276 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilycoin_S2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.