엔화 840원 ㄷㄷ
🔥3👍2

Channel
@Kooncrypto
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,420subscribers
-5,588 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001517482685 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kooncrypto |
| Description | 크립토 채널 | Korea Crypto Channel - Since 2022 활발한 유저들이 함께하는 라쿤 채널입니다. 모두의 성공적인 투자를 응원합니다! 크립토를 비롯한 다양한 소식을 공유합니다. 게시물에는 오류나 검증되지 않은 내용이 포함될 수 있으므로 투자 전 공식 자료를 확인해 주세요. 투자 권유나 조언이 아니며, 모든 투자 판단과 책임은 본인에게 있습니다. 📩 Contact: @KoonNFT 𝕏: x.com/koon_nft |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kooncrypto |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Kooncrypto/2506 · this entry29 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC | @cryptopaz0/416429 Oct 2026, 13:58 UTC | 1.00 | 19 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cryptopaz0 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 41 minutes | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 72 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 17:07 | 12,420 | -21 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:51 | 12,441 | +47 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:30 | 12,394 | -17 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:50 | 12,411 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:46 | 12,424 | -25 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 12,449 | +45 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:10 | 12,404 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:26 | 12,419 | -15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:18 | 12,434 | -24 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 12,458 | +50 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 12,408 | -18 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 12,426 | -25 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 12,451 | -20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 12,471 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 12,480 | +65 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 12,415 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 12,417 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 12,428 | -36 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:07 | 12,464 | +42 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 12,422 | first reading |
79 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (25 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,751 |
| Reactions total | 450 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
982 reactions across 79 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 444 | 45.2% | |
| 👍 | 314 | 32.0% | |
| 🔥 | 127 | 12.9% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 3.05% | |
| 🫡 | 26 | 2.65% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 2.24% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 1.22% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.305% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.305% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.102% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 982 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (10.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
엔화 840원 ㄷㄷ
🔥3👍2
TCG 포켓몬 카드 100장 래플 + 약 415만 원 우표추 래플 1. TOPLOAD | PSA 등급 카드 100장 레드의 피카츄, 생일 피카츄, 뮤 ex SAR도 경품에 있음 로그인 → 본인인증 → 인스타 계정 등록 → topload.fun 팔로우 11/12(목) 밤 11시 59분 마감 11/13(금) 오후 5시 발표 · 11/15(일) 오후 5시까지 수령 🔗 TOPLOAD 무료 응모 추천인은 NX0Z XP0F ATS1 6G7X 2. TOPLOAD | K/DA 리프트바운드 박스 추첨 topload.fun 팔로우 → 이벤트 게시글 좋아요 → 댓글에 “줴줴이야” 작성 11/13(금) 오후 5시 당첨 발표, 당첨자는 인스타 DM으로 개별 안내 🔗 인스타 이벤트 게시글 3. GACHA × TCG 브레이커 | 리프트바운드 PSA 10 TCG…
👍14❤6🔥4🤯1
🍀 21억의 주인공을 찾습니다. 커뮤니티야, 내 크립토에 행운을 빌어줘 커뮤니티 이벤트 끝난 줄 알았죠? 이번엔 판을 좀 키워봤습니다. 😎 American Fortress, Antseed, Flap에 이어 Aptos, Morpho, Travala까지 합류!🔥 🎁 총 500명 보상이 준비된 리워드! 🎟 연금복권 교환권 5,000원 × 300명 ☕️ 커피 쿠폰 200명 복권으로 인생 역전? 그건 운에 맡기고, 일단 커뮤니티 입장하고 선물부터 챙겨가세요! 🍀 🚀 참여 방법 1️⃣ 아래 6개 프로젝트 커뮤니티 모두 입장하기! 🔹 Flap 공지방 ㅣ 커뮤니티 🔹 American Fortress 공지방 ㅣ 커뮤니티 🔹 Antseed 공지방 ㅣ 커뮤니티 🔹 Morpho 공지방 ㅣ 커뮤니티 🔹 Travala 공지방 ㅣ 커뮤니티 🔹 Aptos 공지방 …
❤4👍2🔥1
✅바이낸스 MEXC 관련 입출금 제한 (법인·계열사가 포함) 조치 배경 • 바이낸스에 따르면 미국 금융범죄단속네트워크(FinCEN)가 MEXC를 ‘주요 자금세탁 우려 대상’으로 지정 • 제한 대상에는 MEXC, MEXC Global 및 공지에 명시된 관련 법인·계열사가 포함 입출금 처리 방식 • 바이낸스 → MEXC: 출금 요청 거절 • MEXC → 바이낸스: 입금 자금 일시 보류 및 규정 준수 심사 진행 • 해당 업체와 관련된 직·간접 송금 및 거래 모두 제한 대상 계정 제한 가능성 • 심사 기간 중 해당 바이낸스 계정의 이용이 제한될 수 있음 • 추가 제한이나 서비스 이용 종료 조치가 적용될 가능성도 명시 공지사항 #바이낸스
❤6👍3🔥1
SearchFi × American Fortress AMA 2026년 크립토 시장에서 주목받는 세 가지 핵심 내러티브! 양자내성 보안부터 온체인 프라이버시, 영지식 증명 ZK까지. American Fortress의 CEO 겸 CTO Mehow Pospieszalski와 함께 이 세 가지 기술이 지갑 보안과 프라이버시에 어떤 역할을 하는지 알아보는 시간! ✅AMA 일정 일정: 11월 11일(수) 오후 10시 KST 링크: X 스페이스 ✅ AMA 참여자 특별 보상 80명에게 $5씩, 총 $400 EVM 지갑으로 에어드랍 예정 보상 응모하기 ✅이벤트리 경품 피자 10명 · 커피 200개 이벤트리 참여하기 수요일 밤 10시, 스페이스참여하러 가시죠!!
❤10🔥4🫡4👍1🤯1
누가 중국 크립토 텔방 모아둔건데 정리 잘해놔서 보면 좋을듯 중국은 코인 하는 방식이 가장 다양함. https://web3-tg-chaos.deed.page/
❤6👍2🔥1
🎆🎇Ondo Perps보상 확대, 총 250K USDC 보상 Ondo Perps가 주간 거래 보상 규모를 확대하고 신규 무기한 선물 마켓을 추가했습니다. 📰주간 거래 보상 확대: 총 250,000 USDC ▸기간: 11월 3일 ~ 10일 오전 8:59(KST) ▸ 유동성 공급: 112,500 USDC (중간가격 ±25bps 이내) ▸거래량 보상: 112,500 USDC (전체 선물 마켓) ▸미결제약정 보상: 25,000 USDC (포지션 보유) ▸보상은 종료 후 48시간 이내 USDC로 지급 ➡️OPENAI 예측 이벤트 (~11/12 19시) • OPENAI Pre-IPO 선물 가격 예측 시 총 5명에게 500 USDC 지급 • 참여: 팔로우 후 좋아요·RT + 예상 가격 댓글 작성 • 기준: 마감 시점 1분봉 시가 ↔️추가 소식 - …
❤6👍3🔥2
✅매일 발생하는 보안 이슈 Keplr 지갑 체크해보세요 📰Keplr Wallet, 일부 계정 무단 거래 발생 • Google·Apple 로그인으로 생성한 일부 지갑에서 무단 거래 사례 보고 • 인증 서비스 Web3Auth와 공동 조사 진행 • Google·Apple 로그인 기능 일시 중단 • 시드 구문 및 하드웨어 지갑 이용자는 초기 조사상 영향 없음 • 정확한 사고 원인과 피해 규모는 조사 중 ⚠Keplr 이용자 주의사항 • 소셜 로그인으로 생성한 지갑에 신규 자산 입금 금지 • 기존 지갑을 다른 서비스에 재등록하거나 복원하지 말 것 • 자산 복구를 제안하는 DM 및 외부 링크 주의 ➡️미래에셋증권, 고객·임직원 정보 유출 • 외부 비정상 접근으로 고객 약 3,800명의 계좌번호 유출 • 임직원 약 35,000건의 이름·사번 정보 …
👍7❤3🔥1
📌 발송 완료! 행복한 주말 되세요~!
❤11👍7🔥2
🎁커피 200잔, 맥머핀 콤보 20개 곧 발송 날씨가 부쩍 추워졌네요🥶 감기 걸리지 않게 따뜻하게 입으시고 즐거운 주말 되시길 바랍니다. 맥머핀 @elp9511 @JAKJAKHYA @kchoonsik @yh20210333 @daeseonhan @bum7120 @kukikukipo @soosung2 @mmrjung @cbc010101 @bbapelvotm @pc970930 @qinq00 @skygoma062 @baekpro @dhl1013 @AmakawaSora @hohoyoung85 @KADAMUKIM @pepe_noh 커피 200잔: 거의 모두가 당첨
👍16❤4🎉3
📌AI 산업의 고용·수익성 변화 분석 AI로 인한 일자리 감소 우려는 다소 완화되고 있으며, 쇼핑·광고 등에서 실제 수익화 성과가 나타나는 중입니다. 원문 📰AI 고용시장 변화 • AI 관련 해고 발표는 8~9월 올해 최저 수준 • 지난해 10월 대비 채용공고 증가 • 엔지니어링 +30%, 소프트웨어 개발 +26%, 제조업 +13% • AI가 일자리를 대체한다는 우려와 달리 기술직 채용 수요 회복 신호 ➡️AI 쇼핑 및 광고 시장 성장 • Adobe에 따르면 AI 유입 쇼핑 트래픽의 매출 기여도는 일반 유입 대비 약 50% 높음 • AI 기반 상품 검색과 가격 비교가 구매 전환에 긍정적인 영향 • Meta의 미국·캐나다 평균 광고 단가는 2개 분기 연속 전년 대비 20% 이상 상승 • AI 기술이 실제 소비와 광고 수익으로 연결되는 모습…
🔥9👍4❤3
✅Sleepagotchi, AI 기반 수면·웰니스 관리 앱 Sleepagotchi는 Gotchi Labs의 첫 번째 헬스·웰니스 서비스로, 수면·회복·활동 데이터를 AI가 분석해 정보를 제공하는 앱 AI 수면 코치 • 개인별 수면 패턴과 회복 데이터 분석 • 수면·회복 상태에 따른 맞춤형 인사이트 제공 • AI와 대화하며 수면 관련 질문 가능 • 수면 점수를 넘어 일상적인 건강 관리 지원 웨어러블 연동 & 차별점 • Apple Watch, Fitbit, Oura, WHOOP, CUDIS, Pulse 지원 • 여러 기기의 수면·회복·활동 데이터 활용 • 별도 웨어러블 없이 휴대폰만으로도 수면 기록 가능 앱 사용 방법 1. 웨어러블 연결 또는 휴대폰 기록 선택 2. 목표 취침·기상 시간 설정 3. AI 수면 코치를 통한 데이터 분석 및 추…
❤8👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @Kooncrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Kooncrypto edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토하는 라쿤” (@Kooncrypto), 12,420 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kooncrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.