Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ian's Intel

@iansintel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,613subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001683662707
TypeChannel
Username@iansintel
DescriptionCrypto intelligence. Stay ahead with crypto news & alpha. 📩 @cryptoian Hyperliquid: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/IANSINTEL Bybit: https://partner.bybit.com/b/IANSINTEL Nothing shared in this channel is to be taken as financial advice
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iansintel

Growth

14,59814,61714,607.56 August 2026 — 14,598 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,617 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,615 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,608 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,607 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,613 subscribers14,6136 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,595–14,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5514,613+6
11 Aug 2026, 19:5714,607-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:3114,608-4
8 Aug 2026, 22:1014,612-3
7 Aug 2026, 22:1614,615-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:4214,617+19
6 Aug 2026, 10:4814,598first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 14,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.173%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held65 (4 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total141,980
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
912
Videos
23
Links
7,610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡3835.5%
3229.9%
👍1110.3%
🤣1110.3%
😭109.35%
🔥43.74%
🎉10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 64 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iansintel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC406 viewsread 13 August 2026

FRANKLIN TEMPLETON GETS SEC CLEARANCE TO USE ON-CHAIN MONEY MARKET FUND FOR COLLATERAL SOURCE

12 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC924 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ORE PROTOCOL FILES B-1 TOKEN TRANSPARENCY DISCLOSURE: BLOCKWORKS SOURCE

4

12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,250 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

TRUMP SUED OVER PLAN TO SELL FAST ACCESS TO TRUTH SOCIAL POSTS: BBG SOURCE

🤡7😭3

12 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈6,730 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

U.S. CPI: +3.4% YEAR-OVER-YEAR EST. +3.4% U.S. CORE CPI: +2.5% YEAR-OVER-YEAR EST. +2.5% SOURCE

1

12 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,030 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

WINTERMUTE PLANS $1B INVESTMENT IN HFT, AI DATA CENTERS; TARGETS 50% NON-CRYPTO REVENUE BY 2027 SOURCE

🤡10👍1

12 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈1,740 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

HYPERLIQUID HIP-3 MARKETS REACH $4.1B OPEN INTEREST ATH SOURCE

3

12 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC≈2,660 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

HARMONY LAYER 1 EXPLOITED; 4B ONE TOKENS MINTED UNAUTHORIZED, 26% SUPPLY SOURCE

🎉1

12 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 13 August 2026

ETF Flows: 11 Aug 2026 🟢 Bitcoin ETFs: $7.8M net inflows 🔴 Ethereum ETFs: -$1.7M net outflows ⚪ Solana ETFs: $0.0M net flows ⚪ Hyperliquid ETFs: $0.0M net flows

11 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 13 August 2026

SEC POISED TO UNVEIL MAJOR CRYPTO PLANS AS CLARITY ACT STALLS: BBG SOURCE

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,740 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

AMMALGAM FILES B-1 TOKEN TRANSPARENCY DISCLOSURE: BLOCKWORKS SOURCE

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @iansintel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,974 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Gong Jiao Wei 巩娇玮
@gongjiaoweiy · 4,775
5 posts
Speicherx’s Crypto Diary
@alphabyspei · 611
3 posts
Dui's Note
@duisnote · 490
2 posts
territory of eternal rest
@specterreads · 290
2 posts
Accumulation Zone - TA & FA Crypto Signals
@AccumulationSignals · 501
1 post
코스모스 생태계 에어드랍 소개
@airdropcosm · 6,296
1 post
알랑이 정보교류소
@AlanInfoExchange · 3,277
1 post
ʄơơŋɠ Crypto Alpha
@Alpha_Foong · 71
1 post
AltcoinSherpaTA
@AltcoinSherpaTA · 3,952
1 post
andy's journal
@ayyyeandy · 6,531
1 post
Black Swan Papers
@blackswanpapers · 226
1 post
Brazen Thoughts 🌯
@brazenthoughts · 262
1 post
C.Cook Club
@cepegamble · 781
1 post
따라하면 돈버는 억까인생 근성코 일기장
@coinking77777 · 5,850
1 post
Cookie Reads 🍪
@cookiesreads · 9,142
1 post
Crypto Nation
@cryptonationjournal · 122
1 post
디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 11,830
1 post
Emperor's Palace
@EmperorsAlfalfa · 1,327
1 post
Finish Alpha 🏎
@finish_aIpha · 18,466
1 post
flim-flam (magician arc)
@flim_flamdegen · 3,699
1 post
Hybiscus Original 🌺
@hybiscusxyz · 479
1 post
Unihax - golden arc
@ideazgarden · 6,068
1 post
PEPE Інвестор
@investpepe · 1,349
1 post
#LuxFEED™
@luxfeedpub · 2,606
1 post
Megami Research
@megami_research · 379
1 post
guzvar’s journal
@mopsikisolana · 336
1 post
시골소녀의 반지하 탈출기
@mysigolgirl · 127
1 post
뉴웨이브 2.0
@Newwaves_nft · 1,889
1 post
예측시장 Info
@prediction_markets_info · 619
1 post
Shill Team SIX 🔱 (Crypto, NFTs, Stocks)
@shillteam6 · 1,258
1 post
Starigade Solo Leveling Journal
@starigadetj · 1,352
1 post
에버그린 Evergreen 정보 공유방
@talkevergreen · 13,541
1 post
플란티스 | Plantes
@theplantes · 538
1 post
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,722
1 post
Тема Ультра 🚸
@trade_ultra · 30,780
1 post
엄선된 준의 식견
@umjuninsight · 743
1 post
Vivarium Degen
@v1varium6137 · 309
1 post
whoiskevin radar
@whoiskevinradar · 2,483
1 post
Yond makes no sense
@yondcallsbeta · 3,479
1 post
ZeroKing DeFi Degenerate’s
@ZeroKingGems · 1,399
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 253,728
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
CNA
@cnalatest · 225,435
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ian's Intel” (@iansintel), 14,613 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iansintel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.