https://t.me/whoiskevinradar/1245 1.5빌에 equity딜이라는거같네 낮나? 생각햤는데 라이터 펀딩받았을때랑 동일밸류였구나 뭐 이러나저러나 저게사실이면 당분간 최소한 tge없지않을지
👍2

Channel
@JeJeCryptoDiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,276subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001737854826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JeJeCryptoDiary |
| Created | 12 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JeJeCryptoDiary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 5,276 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 5,281 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 5,294 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 5,293 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,267 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
185 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 112 | 60.5% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 21.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 5.95% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 4.86% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.78% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.70% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.541% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/whoiskevinradar/1245 1.5빌에 equity딜이라는거같네 낮나? 생각햤는데 라이터 펀딩받았을때랑 동일밸류였구나 뭐 이러나저러나 저게사실이면 당분간 최소한 tge없지않을지
👍2
https://x.com/sigmasquared_/status/2083222933682446379?s=46 볼거없는 크립토에서 지금 시점 내 거의 유일한 코인관심사 : tradexyz 1. 만약 나중에 ipo 혹은 tge를 하게된다면 hype 밸류에 변화가 생기게되나 -> 잘모르겠음.. 밸류 파편화라고 생각했는데 현구조는 일종의 공생관계인거라.. 가장 큰 관심사는 ipo나 tge를 할것인가인데 뭐 당연히 기밀정보일거라 나는 알수가업따이
❤3
무야이호또이야호또로마또로야모~~~~~~~티!
grvt는 공식 커뮤니티 이름부터 단~단히 잘못됐어 예전에 공식 커뮤니티 이름이 파밍 커뮤니티인거보고 경악을 금치못했네 파밍을 대놓고 공인해주는 프로젝트는 또 처음봄 이래놓고 선형베스팅도 아니고 지들 맘대로 슬래싱에 베스팅거니까 백배로 욕먹지 정신차리세요잉 난 기대도 안해서 200포인트인가 예치하고 받았던거 8개월 락업돌리고 잊음ㅇㅇ 별 기대도안했네
🔥3
오늘 간만에 멘탈이 아주 개같이터질뻔했는데 에헤라디야 노래부르면서 어떻게 일종의 패닉셀은 안하고 마무리했네 투자는 정말 어려운거같음ㅠ 감정을 어떻게 배제하냐고 도대체~ 사고파는건 뜨거운 가슴으로 하는거아니냐고ㅠ 주식이 이정도 변동성 가질줄도몰랐고 내가 대처못한것도 맞고…. 눈 물 만 난 다 고점에 못판 내 자신을 강하게 질책하면서 글 매무리.
❤11🙏2
대재명 낭낭하게 벌던 주식이 손익분기점에 거의 다와서 피땀눈물흘리면서 매도버튼 누르기만 덜덜덜 기다리는중인 슬픈 낮이에요 이럴 때일수록 서로 긁으면 뒈지게욕먹고 수명연장하는거니까 둥글~게둥글~게
❤5❤🔥3🙏3
https://x.com/axisfdn/status/2077377662780047641?s=46 Axis 7월 29일에 50밀캡으로 예치열리나보넹 예치작 해킹위험은 항상있으니 뭐.. 나는 어느정도 감수하고 좀 들어갈거긴해~
? 공부좀 열심히해서 한다니까; 바로 거래시작하는거뭐지 cctv 달려있는줄 https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade/xyz:cxmt ㅅㅂ;
아이번달 빅테크실적만 봐야대는줄알았더니 메모리쟁이들의 엄청난이벤트가있었넹 cxmt 예상 상장일은 7월 27일이라고 어제뉴스떴고 공모가도 확정됐다?네? 우리는 cxmt ipo때 못참여하니까 뭘해야할까요~ 얼마전 미래에셋 레포트는 대략 $200b(300조원) 내외 밸류로 보고있는거같더라공 다른데는 최대 600조원까지도보는듯ㄷㄷ 어떤용감한 증권사는 60조원이래 근데 60이든 600조원이든 이건좀~ 얼마나 빅이벤트냐면 커촹반 중국의 나스닥 1위 시총이 구글검색상 180조원 내외인데 그거 나오자마자 따잇하느냐마냐 수준의이벤트네ㄷㄷ 나도 메모리조금있는 주식하는상놈이니까 IPOP 나오기전까지 열심히공부해두고 나오면 사이즈실어서 잔뜩참여해보고싶오
❤1👍1
카카오톡 오픈채팅을 시작해 보세요. 링크를 선택하면 카카오톡이 실행됩니다. 코코코코르히 https://open.kakao.com/o/gJDT9UCi 비번: golf
😢9❤1🥰1
까먹었다ㅋㅋ 오늘 점심시간즈음에 올려보는걸로~~~
❤3
거의 반년동안 반토막 넘게나면서 묶여있던 라이터 스테이킹해서 번 1000개 정도 라이터까지 싹싹김치해서 2.6에 다 팔았으 더올라도 안아쉬워~(사실아쉬움) 어쨌든 벌었으니 야맙다 나름 나한테는 꽤 의미있는 수익금이라 아주기분이 좋넹 이따 모 저녁시간에 커피나 나눌게요😛
❤16
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JeJeCryptoDiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 322,698 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“제제” (@JeJeCryptoDiary), 5,276 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JeJeCryptoDiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.