Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ch

Channel
@HANAStrategy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18,842subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001051936811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HANAStrategy |
| Description | 주식전략 이재만과 퀀트 이경수가 전하는 1등 리서치, 1등 투자전략 채널(본 텔레방 외는 모두 사칭으로 주의하세요) |
| Created | 29 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HANAStrategy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 18,842 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 18,852 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 18,853 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 18,857 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 18,853 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 18,851 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 18,857 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 18,858 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 18,858 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 132,914 |
| Reactions total | 179 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
179 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 67.0% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 9.50% | |
| 🆒 | 11 | 6.15% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 4.47% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 4.47% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.559% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ch
✔'26년 8월 MSCI Korea Standard Index 리뷰 발표 (하나증권 퀀트 이경수, 이철현) ⚡ 편입 종목(FIF): LG이노텍(0.6) ⚡ 편출 종목: 포스코인터내셔널, 삼성에피스홀딩스, LG디스플레이, HLB ⚡ 주요 FIF 조정: LIG넥스원(0.575→0.6), DB손해보험(0.625→0.65), 크래프톤(0.6→0.575), 유한양행(0.7→0.625), KT&G(0.8→0.85), 한국항공우주(0.725→0.6) ⭐ EM 내 상위 국가 비중 변화('25년 11월->'26년 2월->'26년 5월->'26년 8월) 대만: 20.5% -> 21.2% -> 25.3% -> 27.6% 중국: 28.9% -> 26% -> 22% -> 21.5% 한국: 12.9% -> 15.4% -> 21.7% -> 19% 인도: 15.4% …
Signed ch
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed ch
[하나증권 퀀트 이경수] 미국, 왜 지금 리비전 팩터인가? ※ 리비전(실적 모멘텀) 팩터 7월 눌림목은 절호의 기회 ※ ▲ 8월 실적시즌 직후의 계절성, 목표주가 괴리율 상위 및 1개월 실적 상향 등 유리한 시기 - 중장기적으로 미국 리비전(실적 컨센서스 상향) 팩터는 위험대비 성과 최고 알파원으로, 141개월(2014-12~2026-08) L-S 기준 OP 3M 상향 IR 1.11 / MDD -7.5%, NP 1M 상향 IR 1.01 / MDD -9.8% - 절대수익 상위인 고베타(CAGR +19.5%)는 IR 0.85에 MDD -54.4%로 위험 대비 효율이 다른 차원. 7월 리비전 팩터의 눌림목은 절호의 기회인 셈. - 지난 2월 리비전 팩터의 급락은 앤트로픽 AI 위협으로 인한 상장 리비전 상위 종목군에 우려가 반영된 결과, 7월 중…
❤6
Signed ch
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🆒1
Signed ch
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🆒1
Signed ch
✔️국내 실적 전망 (코스피 26F OP YoY +226% 예상) 💬3Q26F OP 추정치: 277조원으로 QoQ +21.2% (추정치 변화 1개월 -0.5%, 1주전대비 +0.3%) 💬올해 OP 전망치: 979조원 (1개월 +4.2%, 1주전대비 +2.4%) ✔️국내 대형주/업종/종목 리비전 상하위(3Q26F OP 기준) 👍 상향: 삼성전기/한화에어로스페이스/셀트리온/삼성SDI/LS ELECTRIC/HD한국조선해양/한화오션 🥲 하향: LG에너지솔루션/두산에너빌리티/POSCO홀딩스/고려아연/한국전력 👍3Q26F OP 상향 업종: 항공, 해운, 정유, 조선, 가전, 기술하드웨어, 상사, 전기장비 🥲3Q26F OP 하향 업종: 화학, 2차전지, 디스플레이, 게임, 증권, 유틸리티 👍3Q26F OP 상향 주요 종목: 삼성SDI/SK이노베이션/…
❤9
Signed 퀀트 이경수
📡 주간 퀀트 코멘트 (‘26.8.9, 하나증권 이경수) ✔️AI 기업들의 압도적 실적모멘텀 지속, 채권대비 주식 선호도 지속 증가 💬AI 기업들의 어닝 서프라이즈 지속, IT 위주 글로벌 실적모멘텀 크게 발현 중 💬AMD — 8/4 장 마감 후 ✅ 시간외 -8.9% 매출 $115.4억(YoY +50%), 데이터센터 $67.2억(YoY +107%, 전체 58%). Non-GAAP EPS $1.66(컨센 +3.8%). Q3 가이던스 $130억(컨센 대폭 상회). Anthropic·MS와 Instinct MI400 신규 파트너십. 실적은 역대 최고이나 기대치 선반영으로 주가 역전. 💬Caterpillar — 8/4 장 전 ✅ 17년 만에 최대 일간 상승 +12% 매출 $205.4억(YoY +24%, 사상 첫 분기 $200억 돌파). Adj. E…
❤5
Signed 퀀트 이경수
8/10일 하나증권 전략 이재만 [화수분전략] 반도체와 비반도체: 차별화 전략 ▶자료: https://bit.ly/4wMLOxB * 글로벌 금융위기와 코로나19 펜데믹은 글로벌 공통 위기였고, 이를 극복하기 위해 각국 중앙은행은 기준금리 인하. 코로나19 펜데믹 빠르고, 대폭적인 기준금리 인하를 통해 기존 주도업종은 1개월만에 주가 회복. 점진적 기준금리 인하가 진행됐던 글로벌 금융위기 5~6개월만에 주도업종 주가 회복 * 현재의 경기와 기업 이익 확장 고려하면, 기준금리 인하 기대 어려움. 급락했던 코스피 PER과 같은 밸류에이션 회복도 더디고, 급락 이후 자금 유입도 주춤한 상황. 다만 고려할 수 있는 부문은 미국은 제조업 중심 경기 확장, 이를 기반으로 미국의 경우 위험자산 선호도 개선 * 현재와 같이 미국 ISM 제조업지수가 확장 …
❤5👍4💯1
Signed 이재만
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2👏1
Signed ch
[하나증권 퀀트 이경수] 디레버리징의 끝, 알파의 시작 ※ 변동성 끝자락에 알파의 시기 도래 ※ ▲ 공매도 상위 및 주가 낙폭과대 등 지수 반등 시에 유리한 종목군과 MSCI KOREA 전략 - 지난 7월은 상반기 성과에 대한 언와인딩·로테이션 특성의 고유 계절성과, 상반기 과도한 레버리지 누적에 따른 반도체 변동성 확대가 맞물리며 계절적 특성이 극단적으로 표출됐던 시기. 현재는 그 국면에서 벗어나는 흐름 감지 - 특히 글로벌 변동성을 야기했던 한국 증시 내 디레버리징이 급격히 나타나면서 향후 변동성 완화의 토대가 마련 - ETF 수급 측면에서도 반도체 단일종목 레버리지 ETF보다 지수 관련 ETF로의 유입이 더 커지는 변화가 관찰되어 수급의 응집력이 재생되고 있음 - 8월의 계절성은 하반기 성과를 위한 알파 베팅 경향이 뚜렷해지는 시기. …
❤8💯4
Signed ch
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed ch
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @HANAStrategy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 43,454 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《하나 주식전략》 이재만과 이경수” (@HANAStrategy), 18,842 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HANAStrategy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.