[BTC 현물 ETF 3468억원 순유입] 5일(현지시간) 미국 비트코인 현물 ETF에 약 2억4440만 달러(3468억원)가 순유입됐다고 파사이드인베스터(Farside Investors)가 집계했다. 3거래일 연속 순유입이다. -블랙록 IBIT +1억9680만 달러 -피델리티 FBTC +1130만 달러 -비트와이즈 BITB +1060만 달러 -아크인베스트 ARKB +3760만 달러 -반에크 HODL -1470만 달러 -모건스탠리 MSBT +280만 달러

Channel
에이엠매니지먼트(AM Management)
@AMmanagement
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,279subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001640065034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AMmanagement |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AMmanagement |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 1,279 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 1,279 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,279 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 768
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.06%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,362 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 42.9% | |
| custom 6107275939647851699 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
[이란·오만 대표단, 호르무즈 해협 협정 초안 합의] AP통신에 따르면, 지역 관리 2명이 5일(현지시간) AP통신에 이란과 오만 협상 대표단이 협정 초안에 합의했으며 현재 이란 최고지도자의 최종 승인을 기다리고 있다고 밝혔다. 협상 사정에 정통한 이들 관리에 따르면, 해당 잠재적 협정은 호르무즈 해협 해상운송 문제를 둘러싼 미국·이란 간 분쟁의 임시 해결 방안으로 마련됐다. 이 협정은 올해 6월 미국과 이란이 분쟁을 종식하고 해협을 재개방하기 위해 체결했으나 결국 이행되지 못한 합의와 관련된 것이다. 이들은 이번 잠재적 협정이 미국과 이란이 테헤란 핵 프로그램에 대한 최종 합의를 위해 협상을 재개하는 토대가 될 것이라고 전했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164819
[BTC 현물 ETF 3010억원 순유입] 4일(현지시간) 미국 비트코인 현물 ETF에 약 2억1150만 달러(3,010억원)가 순유입됐다고 파사이드인베스터(Farside Investors)가 집계했다. 2거래일 연속 순유입이다. -블랙록 IBIT +1억7030만 달러 -피델리티 FBTC +1960만 달러 https://coinness.com/news/1164757
😙 AM WEEKLY REPORT *2026 8월 1주차 - 1. 지난주 되짚어 보기 2. 글로벌 시황 3. 금주 주요 일정 4. 미국 금리 전망 및 연준 발언 동향 5. 글로벌 시가 총액 6. 가상자산 시가 총액 및 도미넌스 7. USDT 도미넌스와 비트코인 8. CME Crypto COT Positioning 09. U.S Bitcoin ETF Holdings 10. 애널리스트 시황 11. 종합 의견+ https://naver.me/xUZcf44d
❤2👍1
#코스피_월봉
[트럼프 "이란 공격 취소에 동의"] 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령이 이란에 대한 공격을 취소하기로 했다고 밝혔다. 트럼프는 "이란과 중동 국가들이 호르무즈 해협의 즉각적·전면적 개방과 이란의 핵 위협 종식을 포함한 합의의 기본 틀이 바련됐다. 신속한 합의 체결을 조건으로 이란 공격을 취소했으며 이스라엘도 이에 동참한다"고 말했다.
#Michael_Saylor
[美 6월 근원 PCE 예상치 하회...전월比 0.1% ↑] 6월 미국 근원 개인소비지출(PCE) 물가지수가 전월 대비 0.1% 상승했다고 미국 상무부 경제분석국(BEA)이 발표했다. 전문가 예상치(0.2% 상승)에 못 미친 수치다. 전년 동기 대비로는 3.3% 상승해 예상치(3.3% 상승)에 부합했다. 변동성이 큰 에너지와 식료품을 제외한 근원 PCE 가격지수는 연방준비제도(Fed)가 인플레이션 판단에 중시하는 지표로 꼽힌다. 지표가 예상치를 웃돌면 연준의 금리 인하 기대가 약화될 수 있고, 예상치를 밑돌면 인플레이션 둔화 신호로 해석돼 금리 인하 기대가 커질 수 있다. 일반적으로 위험자산은 금리 인하에 따른 유동성 확대 기대가 커질 때 상승하는 경향이 있다.
❤2👍1
[단독]코스피 10% 폭락한 날...테더·비트코인 등 거래 82% 급등
[BTC 현물 ETF 순유입 전환... 463억원 규모] 29일(현지시간) 미국 BTC 현물 ETF에 3210만 달러(463억원)가 순유입됐다고 파사이드인베스터가 집계했다. 4일 연속 순유출을 끊고 순유입 전환했다. -블랙록 IBIT +8980만 달러 -피델리티 FBTC -4310만 달러 -아크인베스트 ARKB -1460만 달러
美금리 3.50∼3.75%로 5연속 동결…“9대3 표결로 결정”
#코스피
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AMmanagement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 218,544 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“에이엠매니지먼트(AM Management)” (@AMmanagement), 1,279 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMmanagement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.