Channel
@Goraetracker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,073subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002535423119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Goraetracker |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Goraetracker |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 10,073 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 10,075 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 10,079 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 10,084 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 10,089 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 10,093 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 10,095 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 10,095 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (22 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70,733 |
| Reactions total | 426 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
426 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 215 | 50.5% | |
| 🐳 | 161 | 37.8% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 11.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Goraetracker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
조만간에 변동성 크게 나올것 같은 하리 고래들의 포지션들.. 엄청난 고배율로 숏을 유지중이던 8FID 고래 BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $63,899 / 약 1.4천개 숏 / 청산가 $64,133 원래 1,600개 숏을 유지했다가 500개를 더 추가한 75A9 고래 BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $63,852 / 약 2.1천개 숏 / 청산가 $64,593 그러니까 지금 65K만 넘기면 약 3,500개의 숏이 터진다는건데.. 쟤네 시드 다 합치면 100억이 넘는데 100억을 이정도의 고배율로 포지션을 잡는 이유가 뭔가 있지 않을까?
❤4🐳1
비트 1,800개 숏친 고래 분할 청산까지 100불 남음. BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $63,999 / 약 1.8천개 숏 / 청산가 $64,104 이정도면 돈이 그냥 썩어나는건가?
❤8🐳5
64K ~ 64.4K에 약 5,300개의 BTC 숏 포지션이 있으며, 그 중에서 약 3,400개의 숏 포지션은 65K에 도달하면 완전히 사라질 예정.
❤16🐳1
반면에 롱들은.. 엄.. 500개 이상 롱 포지션 중에 2개 빼고는 평단이 다 70K 인데 ㅋㅋ 빅롱 나와서 쟤들 다 본전에 구출해줄 가능성 VS 빅숏 나와서 쟤네 청산가까지 터질 가능성
❤20🐳3
못본 사이에 하리 고래들의 신규 숏이 64K 위에서 새롭게 들어왔음. 한가지 특이한점은 전부다 청산가가 66K 정도로 굉장히 타이트하다는 점..? 과연 대 빅숏 직전일지 아니면 저거 다 터트리면서 숏 스퀴징 장대 양봉 나올지..
🐳12❤5
이 사람 진짜 대 빅숏 노리는건가.. 몇번 분할 청산당하더니 60만불 추가 입금. 그리고 다시 비트 1,300개 충전 완료 ㅋㅋ BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $64,183 / 약 1.3천개 숏 / 청산가 $64,595
❤5🐳3
진짜 뭐지..? 200개 털리고 1,100개 숏 홀딩중 다음 청산가 65.2K
🐳20❤8
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연…
❤17🐳5
지옥에~서 누가 돌아왔~게?
❤18🐳6
근황. 청산 직전에 200개 던지고 청산가 65K로 늘려서 간신히 살아남음. 근데 이정도면 진짜 뭔가 알고 고배 땡긴게 아닐까 싶은데.. BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $64,202 / 약 1.4천개 숏 / 청산가 $65,000
❤15🐳6
청산 200불 전.. 그냥 진짜 할짓없고 돈 많은 병신색기였나?!
🐳14❤4
간만에 고배충 발견 어떤 미친놈이 약 260만불(한화 40억) 입금 후 바로 40배 풀숏 갈겨버림..;; 진짜 말 그대로 풀숏이라 진입가가 64.2K인데 청산가는 64.9K 비트 1,600개라 하리에서 제일 큰 규모의 단일 포지션임. BTC 숏 📉 평단가 $64,202 / 약 1.6천개 숏 / 청산가 $64,889 진짜 이거 그냥 청산당하면 ㅈㄴ 싱겁게 끝날거같긴한데.. 이정도 베팅이면 뭘 알고 하는게 아닐까?
👍16🐳10❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Goraetracker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“고래 따먹자│Goraetracker” (@Goraetracker), 10,073 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Goraetracker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.