Channel
@yul_papa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,227subscribers
-631 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001896737141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yul_papa |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yul_papa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 8,227 | -541 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 8,768 | -72 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 8,840 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 8,858 | first reading |
169 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 169 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 169 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 150,483 |
| Reactions total | 510 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
510 reactions across 128 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 240 | 47.1% | |
| ❤ | 224 | 43.9% | |
| 😈 | 39 | 7.65% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 1.18% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yul_papa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 169 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
미 7월 CPI 3.4%, 예상 부합이 만든 안도와 남은 불씨 : 7월 소비자물가가 전년비 3.4%로 예상에 정확히 부합 : 6월 3.5%에서 한 단계 더 내려온 수치 : 이번 지표의 의미는 금리 인하가 아니라 인상 저지선으로 해석 가능. : 유가와 관세발 물가 재상승으로 시장에는 9월 인상론이 살아 있었고, 고용 쇼크 직후 인상 확률은 44%까지 내려온 상태였습니다 : 이토로의 브렛 켄웰은 앞선 고용지표를 두고 인상 압박을 덜어줄 만큼 약했지만 경제 붕괴를 시사할 정도는 아니었다고 평가했습니다. : 물가까지 예상선에 묶이면서 9월 동결 쪽에 무게가 더 실리는 조합 : 반대 의견으로는 BofA의 스티븐 주노가 예상에 부합해도 근원 물가의 방향에 따라 9월 인상 근거가 강화될 수 있다고 봤고, 모닝스타의 도미닉 파팔라도는 예상을 웃돌 경우 주식…
❤1
⚠️⚠️미국 CPI 발표 결과⚠️⚠️
하방 헤지 실종, 풋콜 스큐 작년 4월 이후 최저. Kobeissi Letter : 1개월 풋콜 스큐가 1.15포인트까지 내려와 2025년 4월 이후 최저입니다. 하락 보호에 돈을 안 쓰고 있다는 뜻입니다 : 반대로 3개월 콜 스큐는 0.9포인트로 최소 12개월 내 최고입니다. 상방 추격에는 웃돈을 내는 중입니다 : 헤지 없는 낙관이 쌓인 시장은 작은 충격에도 반응이 커집니다. 4월 급락 직전과 닮은 구도라는 점이 이 차트의 경고입니다 #옵션스큐 #투자심리
한국 레버리지 버블 붕괴, 하이닉스 ETF 자산 70% 증발. GlobalMktObserv : SK하이닉스 레버리지 ETF 운용자산이 6월 정점 대비 160억달러, 70% 줄어 약 70억달러가 됐습니다 : 삼성전자 연계 레버리지 자산도 25억달러로 반토막 났고, 홍콩 상장 하이닉스 2배 ETF는 고점 대비 86% 무너졌습니다 : 6월 1조원, 7월 9,930억원의 반대매매가 이 청산의 실체입니다. 레버리지는 오를 때와 내릴 때의 속도가 다릅니다 #레버리지ETF #하이닉스
❤1
에버스핀 35% 급락 후 갭 메우기 완료 수순. Barchart : MRAM 메모리 기업 에버스핀이 5월 사상 최고가 이후 35% 급락했습니다 : 4월 30일과 5월 11일에 만든 두 개의 갭을 메우는 조정이었다는 해석입니다 : 현재 20일 이동평균선 위에서 6일 연속 마감을 시도 중입니다. 갭 메우기 후 방향 전환 여부가 관전 대상입니다 #에버스핀 #MRAM
SiTime, 200일선에서 세 번째 방어. Barchart : 반도체 타이밍칩 기업 SiTime이 7월에도 200일 이동평균선을 지켜냈습니다 : 직전 3월의 같은 테스트에서는 지지 후 6주간 190% 급등한 이력이 있습니다 : 과거 한 번의 사례일 뿐 반복이 보장되지는 않습니다. 다만 기관이 반복해서 사 주는 가격대라는 의미는 있습니다 #SiTime #반도체
❤1
중요) 클래리티 액트 통과가 계속 지연되자 SEC가 독자적으로 움직이기 시작 * 클래리티 액트(크립토 시장 구조법) - 크립토를 어떤 기준으로 증권/상품으로 분류할지 - SEC(증권 감독)와 CFTC(상품 감독)가 어디까지 감독할지 - 토큰 발행사와 거래소가 어떤 규칙을 따라야 할지 = 미국 크립토 시장 전체 규칙을 의회가 법으로 만드는 것 * 이번에 발표한 SEC의 새로운 크립토 규칙 정식 초안 - 초기 프로젝트의 토큰발행 자금조달에 일정 기간 증권 등록 면제 - 큰 프로젝트들을 위한 별도의 자금조달 면제 - 투자계약 형태로 판매된 토큰이라도 일정 조건을 충족하면 증권 취급 X = 현재 SEC 권한으로 정리할 수 있는 부분부터 명확히 하는 것 클래리티 액트가 계속 질질 밀리면서 사실상 올해 안에 통과될 가능성이 점점 낮아지고 있는데 …
아처 애비에이션, 올해 첫 200일선 돌파. Barchart : 에어택시 기업 아처 애비에이션이 다년 추세 채널 하단에서 반등해 올해 처음 200일 이동평균선 위로 올라섰습니다 : 장기 박스 하단 반등과 200일선 회복이 겹친 자리입니다 : 차트상 신호일 뿐 실적 뒷받침은 별개입니다. 상용화 일정이 계속 미뤄져 온 섹터라는 점도 같이 봐야 합니다 #아처 #에어택시
❤1
엔비디아 하나가 미국 전체 거래대금의 3%. Kobeissi Letter : 엔비디아가 올해 미국 전체 거래대금의 3.0%를 차지해 1위입니다. 마이크론 2.8%, 테슬라 2.1%가 뒤를 잇습니다 : 상위 10개 종목이 전체 거래대금의 16.4%를 가져갔습니다 : 쏠림의 이면도 있습니다. 샌디스크의 호가 스프레드는 12.4bp로 S&P500 평균 5.9bp의 두 배가 넘어, 거래는 몰리는데 유동성 질은 나쁜 종목이 섞여 있습니다 #거래쏠림 #유동성
하이닉스 양심 없게 $600~$747에 롱 걸어둔 그리드가 있는데 알고보니 어제 올린 잘치는 고래 숏 익절 예약임 4개월 간 PnL이 안정적으로 상승하면서 우상향 수익을 내고 있음 (4개월 간 대략 50억으로 150억 만듬) 진짜 갈까봐 무서운데 또 막상 가면 기회일거 같기도..? #주식 #온체인데이터
❤1
코어위브 시간외 급등, 7월 저점 이후 60% 반등. Barchart : AI 인프라 기업 코어위브가 시간외에서 급등했습니다 : 7월 말 저점 이후 상승폭이 60%에 달합니다 : AI 데이터센터 수요가 실적으로 확인되는 기업에 자금이 다시 몰리는 흐름입니다 #코어위브 #AI인프라
은 상승은 추세의 끝이 아니라 시작이라는 주장. TaviCosta : 매크로 운용사 크레스캣의 타비 코스타가 은 상승을 추세의 시작으로 본다는 차트를 냈습니다 : 금 대비 은의 상대 저평가와 실물 수요를 근거로 드는 진영입니다 : 어디까지나 강세론자의 주장입니다. 반대편에는 산업 수요 둔화를 짚는 반론도 있습니다 #은 #귀금속
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @yul_papa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 17,378 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T.A Crypto” (@yul_papa), 8,227 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yul_papa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.