Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
71.8 average views per post against 6,453 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1.11%. Across the 424 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,166–9,992 subscribers, posting mainly in Korean — the middle half sit between 8.81% and 30.4%, with a median of 16.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
23 of 23 published in the window (23 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,652
Mature posts only
1.11% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,450–6,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
6,453
-19
8 Aug 2026, 06:32
6,472
-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:02
6,475
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.11%
avg views ÷ 6,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.8
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
23 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
1,652
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,640
Videos
≈80
Links
≈1,380
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
23
35.4%
❤
22
33.8%
👏
15
23.1%
🐳
4
6.15%
😁
1
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧊 Eigen Summer Event!
쿨한 여름, 아이겐은 지금?⛱️
무더운 여름에도 아이겐의 업데이트는 계속됩니다!
최근 아이겐에는 어떤 소식이 있었을까요?
아이겐의 최신 근황 및 업데이트 내용을 확인한 뒤, 가장 인상 깊었던 내용을 자유롭게 공유해 주세요. 시원한 보상이 기다리고 있습니다! 🍨
✅ 참여 방법
✔️ 아이겐 최신 업데이트 콘텐츠 확인하기
✔️ 가장 인상 깊었던 내용 또는 기대되는 부분을 세 줄 이상 작성하기
✔️ 트윗 혹은 네이버 블로그에 필수 해시태그 키워드 'Eigen' 포함하기
👉🏻 이벤트리 제출
🎁 이벤트 보상
배스킨라빈스 싱글레귤러 모바일 상품권
총 50명
📅 이벤트 기간
26. 08.10~26. 08.18 까지
올여름 아이겐의 최신 근황도 확인하고, 시원한 아이스크림 보상도 받아가세요! 🧊🍦
🚨 DAPPOS 에어드랍 클레임 오늘 오픈
DAPPOS 에어드랍 클레임이 오늘 오픈된대요!
⏰ 오픈 시간
• 8월 10일 오후 7시 (KST)
중요한 건 피싱 링크 조심!
DAPPOS 공식 링크만 사용시고, X 댓글이나 DM으로 오는 링크는 절대 누르지 마세요!
🔗 트윗 원문 보기
🎒 Backpack에서 진짜 미국 주식을 거래할 수 있는 거 아세요?
백팩 사이트에 Stocks 라는 카테고리가 생겨서 보니까 Backpack Securities라고 백팩 증권이 새로 생겼네요.
그래서 토큰화 주식인가? 했더니 그게 아니고 실제 미국 주식이랑 ETF에 1:1로 연결됐다고 하는데
코인 거래소에서 진짜 주식을 거래할 수 있다니 신기,,
실제 찐 주식이고 미국 증권사 뉴욕법의 적용을 받는다고 함.
보니까 아직 퍼블릭 베타고 이 기간 동안에는 약 1,000개의 주식과 ETF를 지원한다고 해요.
백팩 증권 들어가 보면 SPY, QQQ, NVDA, AAPL 유명한거 웬만하면 다 있음
주식 거래는 24시간 365일 가능하고 소수점 주식 거래는 정규장 시간에 가능...!
평소에 코인의 장점이 장 시간이 정해져 있는게 아니라 24시간 아…
⚡ Eigen Labs x Lighter, Lighter.fast 공개
Lighter는 거래소가 주문과 체결을 제대로 처리했다는 걸 암호학적으로 증명하는 구조를 가진 거래소인데요!
이런 구조는 투명성과 신뢰는 강하지만, 실제로 거래소처럼 빠르게 돌아가려면 증명 속도도 엄청 중요하죠.
그래서 이번에 나온 Lighter.fast는 Lighter의 실제 거래소 prover 성능을 더 빠르게 만들기 위한 오픈 리서치 챌린지래요!
📌 핵심 내용
• Eigen Labs x Lighter 협업
• Lighter의 실제 거래소 prover 성능 개선이 목표
• 사람뿐 아니라 AI 에이전트도 참여 가능
• 총 보상은 15K LIT, 약 3만 달러 규모
• 더 빠른 “증명 가능한 거래소”를 만들기 위한 실험
Eigen Labs가 계속 사람 + AI 에이…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cryptosylvie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“실비로운 코인생활” (@cryptosylvie), 6,453 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosylvie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
