Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trader Hyun's crypto diary

Channel

Trader Hyun's crypto diary

@TraderHyun

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,563subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001484769628
TypeChannel
Username@TraderHyun
Created1 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TraderHyun

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,5636,6656,6147 August 2026 — 6,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,664 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,656 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,645 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,640 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,631 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,623 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,611 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,608 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,596 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,587 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,585 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,569 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,563 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,548–6,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:406,563-6
14 Sept 2026, 10:176,569-16
10 Sept 2026, 12:416,585-2
5 Sept 2026, 05:166,587-9
1 Sept 2026, 11:236,596-12
29 Aug 2026, 07:086,608-3
26 Aug 2026, 16:346,611-12
23 Aug 2026, 08:176,623-8
20 Aug 2026, 00:276,631-9
16 Aug 2026, 22:276,640-5
13 Aug 2026, 11:386,645-11
10 Aug 2026, 13:516,656-8
7 Aug 2026, 14:536,664-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:156,665no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:076,665first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 26 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11864.8%
👍5831.9%
👌21.10%
🔥21.10%
🎉10.549%
👏10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC279 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @PredictFiKORPhoto

📣 Ave.ai 진행중인 이벤트 목록 - 66,000USDT 상당의 이벤트 진행중 - 한화 약 9천만원 상당의 토큰 경품 1. 매일 밤 라이브 방송 USDT 무료 뽑기권 증정 - 총 상금 풀: $5,000 상당의 토큰 https://t.me/PredictFiKOR/724 2. AVE x GoldHouse USDT Card 리워드 캠페인 - 총 상금 풀: $11,400 상당의 토큰 https://t.me/PredictFiKOR/729 3. 에이브(AVE) x $DOS 트레이딩 이벤트 - 총 상금 풀: $50,000 상당의 토큰 https://t.me/PredictFiKOR/722 📣한국 사용자는 필수로 설정에서 언어를 한국어로 변경해야합니다: 한국채널 입장

❤6

17 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC394 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

✅ 8/17 크립토 시황 https://naver.me/5Hy5Fu0S

❤2

12 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC557 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @PredictFiKORPhoto

📣에이브(AVE) x $DOS 트레이딩 이벤트 총 상금 풀: $50,000 상당의 토큰 🎤트레이딩 대상 토큰 $DOS #DAPPos ETH: 0x951f086A127e280724fD93CcC543f65065afEb5E BSC: 0xB0f09ea9ae0515C3551080D4a745C8115aA30e37 🎤이벤트 기간: 2026. 08. 12. 22:00 ~ 2026. 08. 25. 23:59 (UTC+8) 🎤상세 활동 내용 1. 선샤인 어워드 * 참여 조건: 이벤트 기간 내 AVE에서 $DOS 누적 거래액 50 USDT 달성 * 보상: 5,000 USDT 상당의 토큰 에어드롭 (참여 인원 공동 분배) 2. 트레이딩 리더보드 * 참여 조건: 이벤트 기간 내 $DOS 거래량 상위 300위 진입 * 보상: 30,000 USDT 상당의 토큰…

❤5

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC658 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📌 DePIN + RWA + AI 교집합, Botanika $1.5M 시드 라운드 클로징 최근 DePIN, RWA, AI 키워드가 묶이는 프로젝트들이 눈에 띄는 가운데, Full Stack Data Infrastructure 프로젝트 Botanika가 $1.5M 시드 라운드를 마무리했습니다. 🌿 핵심 투자 라인업 - 기관: CRIT Ventures, Baboon Ventures, Marble X, Daedalus Angels - 엔젤: Fez & Shayn (Voltr), Jongchan (Trepa), Johannes Jäger (Metrix Capital), Soju (@0xSoju), Cristian (@kiddoq) 💡 눈여겨볼 포인트 - Voltr 같은 디파이 빌더들이 인프라 프로젝트에 엔젤로 참여하는 것은 이례적입니다. 토큰 이…

❤9👍1

9 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC657 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

✅ 예상했던 환율 1400원도달, 현재상황은? https://naver.me/xy7LkT9r

👍4❤1

2 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,020 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

코인베이스에는 5만달러 근처 매수주문이 많네요. 위로 매도는 8만달러에 포진되어있습니다 #호가창 #코인베이스

❤8👌1

2 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC856 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

미결제약정 재차 상승중 #미결제약정

👍6🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC714 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📌 RWA 시장, '보유'에서 '거래' 단계로 넘어가는 순간 최근 RWA(실물자산 토큰화) 시장이 빠르게 성장하고 있습니다, 지금까지는 단순히 자산을 토큰화하는 것만으로는 명확한 한계가 존재했는데요, Ondo Perps는 이 한계를 넘어서는 아주 중요한 시도로 평가받고 있습니다. 어떤 변화가 일어나는지 핵심 포인트를 정리해 드립니다 🔑 주요 포인트 - 기존 RWA 구조: 토큰화 ➡️ 보유 ➡️ 수익 창출 중심 - Ondo Perps의 시도: 토큰화된 주식을 마진(담보)으로 직접 활용해 거래 가능 - 패러다임 전환: RWA가 단순 '보유 중심'에서 적극적인 '거래 중심'으로 확장되는 중요한 전환점 💡 포인트 - 지금까지 RWA 시장은 미국 국채, 주식 등을 온체인으로 가져오는 데 집중했습니다. 자산을 보유하면서 이자 수익을 기대하는 …

👍6

2 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC391 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📌 Ondo Perps vs 기존 Perps DEX 전격 비교 현재 온체인 Perps 시장은 대부분 크립토 자산 중심입니다. 하지만 Ondo Perps는 실물시장(주식·지수·원자재)을 중심으로 설계되었다는 점에서 기존 플랫폼들과 확실한 차별점을 보입니다. 어떤 차이가 있는지 핵심 포인트 4가지로 정리해 드립니다 🔑 주요 비교 포인트 1️⃣ 담보 자산 (Margin) - 기존 Perps DEX: 주로 USDC나 플랫폼 자체 토큰을 마진으로 사용 - Ondo Perps: 토큰화된 주식과 ETF를 마진으로 직접 사용 가능 (가장 큰 차별점!) 2️⃣ 지원 자산 (Markets) - 기존 Perps DEX: BTC, ETH 등 크립토 자산 중심 - Ondo Perps: NVDA, TSLA, AAPL 등 개별 주식, 주요 지수, 금·원유 같은 …

👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @TraderHyun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
블록미디어
@blockmedia · 33,507
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 74,854
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trader Hyun's crypto diary” (@TraderHyun), 6,563 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderHyun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.