🥳 기관 투자자들이 $HYPE 매도를 중단하고 매수를 시작했습니까? Maven11 Capital과 연결된 지갑에서 4시간 전 #OKX에서 202,705 $HYPE (약 1117만 달러)를 인출했습니다. https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0x12249312823853bCb86fD8f8339FE72d63f6301F

Channel
크립토 도서관
@gachi2job
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,004subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001447581120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gachi2job |
| Created | 18 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gachi2job |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 6,004 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 6,009 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 6,021 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 6,029 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 6,030 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 6,030 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.79%
- avg views ÷ 6,004 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 408
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (29 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,855 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
[온체인코리아 Night LIVE] 👉 Metaplex AMA Session 🔥 최근 한국 시장에 혜성처럼 등장한 Metaplex! 알고 보니 이전부터 엄청난 내공을 쌓아온 프로젝트였다? 자그마치 1,400만 유저, 10억 개의 온체인 자산을 만든 독보적 스케일. Metaplex Foundation U.S.A. President인 맥과 함께 지금의 Metaplex가 그리고 있는 솔라나 온체인 자산의 미래를 짚어봅니다. 📅 8월 13일(목) 오후 9시 📍 온체인코리아 X Space(링크는 아래) 🎙 게스트: 맥(Mackenzie Hom) - 메타플렉스 재단 미국 대표 🎤 호스트: 유리 × 메도 🎁 푸짐한 이벤트도 함께 진행됩니다. 💎 질문 선정자 보상 - 사전질문 선정자: 1,500 $MPLX × 6명 - 현장질문 선정자: 1,5…
🥳 최근 기관의 매도에도 불구하고, 일부 대규모 투자자들은 여전히 $HYPE 코인을 매집하고 있습니다. 지난 5일 동안, 새로 생성된 3개의 지갑에서 총 165,425 $HYPE 코인 (약 916만 달러)이 #FalconX에서 인출되었습니다. https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0xF07fC85FB8d8e04b0026cD95c86d75b450f93343 https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0x494C10a04457E2e3C7181bb0D644F25832D3eda3 https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0x1a2844446B7844a40CB7FC993A46a17127986D63
🥳 #이더리움 ICO 참가자 "0x6A53"이 11년 만에 휴면 상태에서 깨어나 #Coinbase에 0.1 $ETH를 입금했습니다. 그는 ICO에 단 $620을 투자하고 2,000 $ETH를 받았습니다 — 현재 가치 $3.83M, 6,184배 수익! https://etherscan.io/address/0x6a53d41ae4a752b21abed5374649953a513de5e5?amt=0.01%7E999999999
🥳 톰 리(@fundstrat)의 #Bitmine이 3시간 전에 추가로 150,120 $ETH (2억 7,800만 달러)를 스테이킹했습니다. 지금까지 #Bitmine은 5,067,309 $ETH (93억 8천만 달러)를 스테이킹했으며, 이는 전체 보유량의 87.4%에 해당합니다.⚡️ https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/bitmine —- 코인 공부/에드는 🥳 프레드 코인배우기 💕하트와 💬댓글은 콘텐츠의 원동력
🥳 개인 채굴자, 비트코인 단독 채굴 성공...3.157 BTC 획득 멤풀스페이스에 따르면 솔로 CK(Solo CK) 채굴풀을 사용하는 한 채굴자가 약 2시간 전 블록 높이 960804에서 비트코인 단독 채굴에 성공해 3.157 BTC를 보상으로 수령한 것으로 나타났다. 업비트 원화 마켓 기준 BTC는 8991만원에 거래되고 있으며, 3.157 BTC는 2억8386만원이다. https://bitaps.com/960804 —- 코인 공부/에드는 🥳 프레드 코인배우기 💕하트와 💬댓글은 콘텐츠의 원동력
🥳 아서 헤이스(@CryptoHayes)가 2일 전에 이더리움을 매도한 후, 다시 이더리움을 구매했습니다. 1시간 전, #Arthur 헤이스는 갤럭시 디지털에 250만 달러($USDC)를 보내고, 1,337개의 이더리움($ETH)을 1,869달러에 구매했습니다. https://arkm.com/explorer/entity/arthur-hayes https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2083342295995384214
🥳 고래 투자자들이 계속해서 $ETH를 매집하고 있습니다. 새롭게 생성된 지갑 주소 0xf31d는 지난 12시간 동안 여러 거래소에서 8,239개의 $ETH (약 1,450만 달러)를 인출했습니다. 고래 투자자 0x363A는 지난 3시간 동안 11,843개의 $ETH (약 2억 800만 달러)를 매집했습니다. https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0xf31dEbCD6BFAFAbab8aC1Da42F5eE8aCFBC9dc71 https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0x363ADF8182fd0fCd0F43d1C904809F85d6f24F7A
🥳 어제 비트코인이 엄청 출렁였습니다. 어제 비트, 이더리움 ETF 현황 한번 보시죠. #Bitcoin ETFs: 1D 네트 플로우: -7,439 $BTC (-$441.88M) 🔴 7D 네트 플로우: -12,619 $BTC (-$749.58M) 🔴 #Ethereum ETFs: 1D 네트 플로우: -21,234 $ETH (-$33.23M) 🔴 7D 네트 플로우: -116,744 $ETH (-$182.7M) 🔴 https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2069796988993036300
🥳 #SIREN 고래는 단지 2일 만에 6700M의 #SIREN (전체 공급량의 92%)를 판매했고, 그로 인해 가격이 90% 이상 하락했습니다. #SIREN을 판매함으로써 고래는 648M의 #USDT를 받았습니다. 그중 257M의 #USDT는 거래소에 입금되었고, 391M의 #USDT는 체인상에 남아있습니다. https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2065971468580872196 —- 코인 공부/에드는 🥳 프레드 코인배우기 💕하트와 💬댓글은 콘텐츠의 원동력
📌LCK 및 롤 대회 정보 사이트 - 롤로나라 롤 경기 보는거 좋아해서 만든 사이트입니다 파워랭킹/ 순위/ 일정/ 포인트 승부 예측 (6월달부터 소소한 이벤트로 잘맞추시는 분들에게 상품 지급 예정) https://www.lololnara.com/ 오늘도 다섯시 LCK 가즈아ㅏㅏㅏㅏㅏㅏ
🥳 🥳 마이클 세일러의 @Strategy는 BTC를 판매할 것인가? #Strategy는 방금 411.48 BTC (303만 달러)를 #CoinbasePrime에 입금했습니다. Polymarket에서 #MicroStrategy가 2026년 12월 31일 이전에 BTC를 판매할 가능성은 현재 84%입니다. https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/microstrategy
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gachi2job. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 405,797 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토 도서관” (@gachi2job), 6,004 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gachi2job.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.