주말과 평일을 가리지않고 터지는 보안사고 두 보안 이슈, 하나의 전쟁: 누가 더 빨리 패치하나. ▸ 구글 프로젝트 제로, 공개 기한 90일에서 2028년 30일로 단축 ▸ 그룹웨어 하나가 금융사 3곳을 17일 만에 뚫었다 #보안
❤1

Channel
@ysytop2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,346subscribers
+3,091 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001701554232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ysytop2 |
| Description | X : https://x.com/Naback222 Chat TG : https://t.me/ysytop22 IDO/ICO/NFT/Airdrop 등등 무지성 참여 ⚡️DM : Naback222 (문의) 이벤트 참여는 본인 선택입니다. 질문이나 기타 내용은 토론방에서 부탁합니다. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ysytop2 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 10,346 | -12 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:09 | 10,358 | -21 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:20 | 10,379 | -11 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 10,390 | -19 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:15 | 10,409 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:55 | 10,422 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:21 | 10,439 | -24 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:40 | 10,463 | -27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:39 | 10,490 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:28 | 10,500 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 10,509 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 10,518 | -1,711 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 12,229 | -513 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 12,742 | -31 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 12,773 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 12,788 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:11 | 12,805 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 12,820 | -439 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 13,259 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 13,288 | first reading |
280 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 280 (3 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 77,802 |
| Reactions total | 119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
274 reactions across 176 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 253 | 92.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.82% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.46% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.46% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.09% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.73% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.365% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 280 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 280 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 104 posts held from the last 30 days (5.77%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
주말과 평일을 가리지않고 터지는 보안사고 두 보안 이슈, 하나의 전쟁: 누가 더 빨리 패치하나. ▸ 구글 프로젝트 제로, 공개 기한 90일에서 2028년 30일로 단축 ▸ 그룹웨어 하나가 금융사 3곳을 17일 만에 뚫었다 #보안
❤1
미 항공 통신 장애 여파는 지속될 것으로 추정 통신 장애가 미국 22개 관제센터를 덮쳤고, 미국 어디에서도 비행기가 뜨지 않았다. ▸ 결항 6,600편+, 지연 8,600편+ ▸ 9·11 이후 가장 긴 전국 중단 ▸ 원인: 1980년대 구리선 스위치 과부하 #국제
지난 24시간 가십거리 주요 이슈는? 액시엄 CEO는 포커 방송에 출연한 게 맞습니다. 플랫폼 자금을 도박했다는 주장은 입증되지 않았습니다. ▸ 규제 지명자 4인, 1월 3일 시한 ▸ 채굴 난이도 하향 임박 ▸ 솔라나 런던행 #이슈
❤2
큰일난 비트코인 근황 ▸ 24시간 청산 12억~16억 달러, 롱 83~89% ▸ 단기 보유자 하루 실현손실 12억 3,000만 달러 ▸ 알트 시즌 지수 43.2, 알트시즌 아니다 $BTC
❤1
텔레그램이 HTML 위젯을 껐다. 서버에서, 모든 봇, 11월 14일 00:30 ▸ 01:02 두로프: 문제없다. '내 계정을 해킹해봐: t.me/monk' ▸ 05:43 카스퍼스키 WebRAT 포착. 위젯 연관은 '추정'일 뿐 ▸ 안드로이드 13.2.2로 업데이트부터 ⌖ 플랫폼별 패치 상태: 안드로이드만 확인됨 ▸ 안드로이드 13.2.2(빌드 7303): 패치 확인됨, 전 사용자 배포 완료 ▸ 데스크톱 7.4.3: 출시됐지만 패치 포함 여부는 미확인 ↳ 7.4.2가 패치 없이 빌드됐다는 보도도 있고, 7.4.3에서 V12 시연 영상이 나온 적도 있음 ▸ iOS·macOS: 패치 빌드 번호가 공개되지 않았고, 수정 여부도 확인 X #텔레그램
❤2
비트코인, 지난 5년 동안 공식적으로 9% 상승 $BTC
❤2
비트코인, 수요는 사라졌고 매도는 한쪽으로만 흐르며, 바닥 지표만 남았다 ▸ 코인베이스 프리미엄 9월 23일 이후 마이너스 ▸ 30일 수요 -34만 8,000 BTC ▸ 채굴사는 원가 아래에서 매도 $BTC
❤2
CZ 트윗 이후 비트코인 가격 근황 #CZ
❤1
나스닥 숏 포지션 2023년 이후 최대 JPM에 따르면 나스닥100을 추종하는 QQQ ETF의 공매도 잔고 비율이 약 11%로 2023년 이후 가장 높다. > 올해 1월 대비 2배 이상 증가 #경제
❤2
찰리멍거가 말하는 똑똑한 사람이 파산하는 3가지 방법 술(Liquor), 여자(Ladies), 그리고 레버리지(Leverage) #유머
젠슨 황이 떠난 다음 날, 직원은 복귀를 원하고, 의회는 답변을 요구 ▸ 직원 88%, 황의 복귀 원한다 ▸ 종가 2위, 격차 1,290억 달러 ▸ 하원 마감 오늘 밤 8시(미 동부) #엔비디아
프로토콜 전반에 걸친 최신 자사주 매입 및 토큰노믹스 업그레이드 원문 ⌖ 핵심 한 줄 ▸ 오늘(11/13) 7,400만 달러 언락이 예정돼 있다. 유통량의 231% 규모라 가장 눈에 띈다 ▸ 나머지는 바이백·소각·발행 축소가 주류다 ⌖ 다가오는 언락 2건 ▸ ethereum:0xa27e…62d2 — 11/13 언락 7,400만 달러, 유통량의 231% ↳ 토큰명은 원문에 표기 없음(컨트랙트 주소만 기재) ▸ $ERA — 11/17 언락 166만 달러, 유통량의 6.62% ⌖ 바이백 & 소각 6건 ▸ $WLFI — World Liberty Financial이 새로운 WLFI 바이백 프로그램 시작 ↳ USD1 준비금 수익의 일부로 재원 마련 ▸ $KNTQ — Banana Gun이 순거래 수익의 40%를 KNTQ 바이백·소각에 사용 ▸ $LA…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 280 posts we hold for @ysytop2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @ysytop2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“나백이의 코인라이프” (@ysytop2), 10,346 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ysytop2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.