Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

나백이의 코인라이프

@ysytop2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,202subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701554232
TypeChannel
Username@ysytop2
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ysytop2

Growth

7,2027,2557,228.56 August 2026 — 7,255 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,255 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,252 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,231 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,202 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,194–7,263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:267,202-29
9 Aug 2026, 11:527,231-21
6 Aug 2026, 15:057,252-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:167,255no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:487,255first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 7,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
783
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.234%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held65 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total50,903
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 47s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 47 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8096.4%
👏33.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC530 viewsread 12 August 2026

LIBER 2차 테스터 신청 및 일정 안내드립니다. 📅 일정 • 2026년 8월 17일 — 신청 마감 • 2026년 8월 18일 — 선정된 테스터 발표 • 2026년 8월 18일 — 테스트 토큰 배포(BNB) • 2026년 8월 19일 ~ 8월 23일 — LIBER App 테스트 진행 <Daily Event> (5days) - Minting LIB: 1 USDT <One-time event> - Loan : 1 USDT - Habitats regester : 1 USDT - Liber Position Deposit : 1 USDT - Referral sign-up : 1 USDT - Core Crew regester: 1 USDT - Mega Crew regester: 1 USDT 🎯 테스트 목표 테스트 기간 동안 아래 사항을 중점적

11 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

단일 종목 레버리지 ‘애프터마켓’ 불허 가닥 1. 내달 14일 개장되는 애프터마켓(오후 4∼8시)에서 ETF 자체를 거래에서 제외하는 쪽에 무게가 실리는중 2. 19일부터 단일종목 레버리지·인버스 ETF(상장지수펀드)·ETN(상장지수증권) 투자하고 싶으면 최소 1시간씩 총 5시간 이상을 이수 필수 3. 기존 규정에 따라 교육을 마쳤거나 교육이 면제된 투자자 소급적용 X

2

11 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,310 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

비트코인-금 상관관계 지수, 고점 수준으로 상승 단 상관관계 지수가 상승했다고 해서 이게 곧 가격 상승을 의미하는것은 아님

1

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,350 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

로또 당첨금 깜박해도 안심...18일부터 ‘자동 지급’ 기획예산처 복권위원회, ‘복권의 발행 관리 및 판매에 관한 지침 개정안’을 의결 > 복권 판매점에서 구매한 종이 로또복권의 당첨금을 모바일로 자동 지급하는 시스템을 구축해 오는 18일부터 본격 가동 > 간편결제 앱인 페이코에 복권을 등록하면 당첨 여부를 정기적으로 알려주고, 지급기한까지 찾아가지 않은 당첨금은 기한 만료 당일에 자동으로 입금

2

11 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

업비트 종합 변동성, 연내 최저치 수준 근접

11 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 12 August 2026

이거 커피 경쟁 존나 없음...ㅋㅋㅋ 참여해보세요 https://t.me/botanika_ann

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤕 StripChain 파해치기 #2 이전에 ICO를 진행하는 내용으로 포스팅한 StripChain 입니다. 보다 세부적으로 리서치가 필요한 것 같아 관련 내용들을 정리해 보았습니다요. ✅ StripChain? - 모든 블록체인과 자산을 연결하는 통합 실행 레이어를 만들려는 프로젝트 - 체인 추상화 + Intent 기반으로 여러 체인과 애플리케이션을 하나의 환경에서 연결하려는 구조. - “어떤 체인을 써야 하지?”가 아니라, “나는 이걸 하고 싶어”라고 요청하면 알아서 실행되는 구조. ✅ 주요 Catalyst - Q3 — Unified Liquidity Layer / Testnet V2 - Q3~Q4 — TGE - Q4 — 추가 체인 연결 및 Mainnet 아직 초기 프로젝트인 만큼 실제 제품과 생태계 확장은 지켜봐야 하

11 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,320 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

비트코인 채굴 난이도, 21년 중국 채굴 금지 이후 최대 낙폭 채굴 난이도의 큰 하락은 곧 채굴자들의 항복 신호로 해석할 수 있음 > 채굴자 항복? -> 비트코인 상승 공식

1

11 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤕 LBank × Pudgy Penguins 리워드 캠페인 펏지펭귄 x LBank 콜라보레이션으로 총 50만달러 규모의 이벤트를 진행합니다. ✅ 세부 일정 - 8/7 17:00 ~ 9/4 00:59, 약 4주 - 신규 유저 $236K - 전체 유저 몫 $264K ✅ 신규 전용 (Step 1/2) - 선물계좌 순입금 100 USDT 시, 10 USDT 지급 - 첫 현물 거래 10 USDT 시, 5 USDT 지급 - 첫 선물 거래 100 USDT 시, 5 USDT 지급 - 합치면 최대 20 USDT 선물 보너스 ✅PENGU 예치 (Step 3) - 7일 락업, 기본 APR 10% - 15,000 PENGU ➡️ 부스트 60% - 20,000 PENGU ➡️ 75% - 30,000 PENGU ➡️ 100% ✅거래 보상

11 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC813 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

coldcard 피해 비트코인 상황 상위 5개 공격자 주소에 83%이상 집중되어 있는 상황 > 아직 대량 이동은 없음

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @ysytop2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,527 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“나백이의 코인라이프” (@ysytop2), 7,202 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ysytop2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.