Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

한양증권 리서치(스몰캡)

@hanyangresearch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,170subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001968548761
TypeChannel
Username@hanyangresearch
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hanyangresearch

Growth

2,1682,1702,1697 August 2026 — 2,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,168 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,168–2,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:172,170+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:472,168no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:122,168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 2,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
267
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.285%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,346
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC210 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔜 [삼양컴텍 줌인] 코스닥 입성 1년…성장세 잇는 투자 성과 주목 삼양컴텍은 지난해 8월 18일 코스닥시장에 상장했다. 전투용 장갑과 항공기 부품 등을 생산하는 방산업체로 K2전차 특수장갑, 소형전술차량 방호키트 등이 주요 제품이다. 상장 첫해 성적은 양호했다. 지난해 매출은 1546억원으로 전년 대비 9.2% 증가했고 영업이익은 266억원으로 47.5% 늘었다. 당기순이익도 227억원으로 37.5% 증가했다. 회사는 수출 확대와 원자재 공급망 다변화에 따른 원가 절감, 공정 자동화 및 안정화에 따른 수율 향상, 고부가가치 제품 비중 확대 등을 실적 개선 요인으로 꼽았다. 지난해 전체 매출에서 수출이 차지한 비중은 약 35%다. 특히 K2전차 특수장갑이 실적 성장의 핵심으로 자리 잡았다. 상장 당시 투자설명서에 따르면 2024년 K2전

6 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC252 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔜 포스코퓨처엠, LFP 시장 뚫었다…양극재 19만톤 장기공급 포스코퓨처엠(003670) 이 리튬·인산·철( LFP) 배터리용 양극재 장기 공급에 합의하며 시장 공략을 본격화한다. 포스코퓨처엠은 국내 유력 배터리 업체와 LFP 양극재 대규모 장기 공급에 합의했다고 6일 밝혔다. 이에 따라 포스코퓨처엠은 내년부터 2032년까지 6년간 19만 톤 이상의 LFP용 양극재를 공급한다. https://www.sedaily.com/article/20076667

1

6 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔜 AI 붐에 바다 밑까지 '들썩'… LS, 전력 대란에 노 저었다 인공지능(AI)발 전력난 속에서 전력 케이블 생산과 해저 포설을 맡은 LS그룹 계열사들이 올해 상반기 일제히 상반기 최대 실적을 올렸다. LS에코에너지의 데이터센터 전력 장비·초고압 케이블 수출과 LS마린솔루션의 해저·지중 공사 물량이 동반 증가하며 고부가가치 수주 잔고를 늘려가는 양상이다. 7일 금융감독원 전자공시시스템에 따르면 LS에코에너지는 올해 2분기 연결 기준 매출 3502억원, 영업이익 252억원을 기록했다. 전년 동기 대비 매출은 40%, 영업이익은 7% 늘어난 수치다. 상반기 누적 매출은 6357억원, 영업이익은 453억원으로 반기 기준 역대 최대 실적을 거뒀다. 상반기에만 지난해 연간 매출(9601억원)의 66%가량을 거두며 연 매출 1조원 진입을 앞둔 모

6 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC284 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://biz.chosun.com/topics/topics_social/2026/08/06/XTME5OAYKRDBXK3NV6LCU5B6WI/

6 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC450 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔜 트럼프, 폴리실리콘 '15% 관세' 검토…한화큐셀·OCI 영향은? Keyword : 폴리실리콘 관세, 비중국 공급망 [기사 요약] 1. 트럼프 행정부의 폴리실리콘 최소 15% 관세 부과 및 최저수입가격제 도입 검토 2. 중국의 글로벌 폴리실리콘 95% 독점 현황 및 가격 급락 3. 한화큐셀·OCI의 미국 관세 적용 대상 제외 요청 4. 비중국 공급망 구축 기업의 경쟁력 강화 및 수혜 전망 5. 국내 기업들의 미국 투자 실적 개선 지속 https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/industry/2026/08/06/0014?_gl=1*1frb8w9*_gcl_au*MTE2NTM5NDY3My4xNzg0NzYzODk1

1

6 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC334 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔜 한화오션·선익시스템 등 슈퍼 을 기업 선정…200억원 규모 7년 이상 지원 한화오션, 선익시스템 등 5개 기업이 슈퍼 을 기업으로 선정돼 200억원 규모로 7년 이상의 대형 연구개발(R&D) 지원을 받게 됐다. 또 정부는 소재·부품·장비(소부자) 협력모델 5건을 승인하고 5년간 910억원의 R&D 등을 지원한다. 산업통상부는 6일 한국무역보험공사에서 제16차 소재·부품·장비 경쟁력강화 위원회를 열고, 소재·부품·장비 협력모델 승인, 제3기 슈퍼 을 선정 결과, 2026년도 소부장 시행계획 3건의 안건을 심의·의결했다. https://news.tf.co.kr/read/economy/2351148.htm

6 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC266 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔜 [단독]병원 잡으려 경쟁 격화…AI 환자 모니터링 시장 '치킨게임' 우려 Keyword : AI 환자모니터링, 가격경쟁 [기사 요약] 1. AI 환자모니터링 시장에서 병원 선점을 위한 출혈 경쟁 심화 2. 제약사들의 기존 공급가 절반 수준의 반값 입찰 진행 3. 마진 포기로 인한 '다 같이 죽자' 식 경쟁 우려 4. 판매사 중심 구조로의 시장 주도권 이동 가능성 5. 제약사의 디지털 헬스케어 사업 확장 전략 추진 https://n.news.naver.com/article/018/0006345473

5 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026

2026년 08월 06일(목) Daily News "실적·주가 모두 바닥인 카카오게임즈, 투자의견 매수"[클릭 e종목] 국내 낮추고 해외 올리고…엇갈린 코스피 전망에 개미 '혼란' 韓 비상! 베센트 장관, 엔 이어 원화 저평가 발언 | 외환시장 개입 시사, 어떤 형태로 할까? | 한상춘 한국경제신문 논설위원 면역항암제 ‘키트루다 큐렉스’ 고성장에…알테오젠, 실적개선 청신호 뇌전증 신약 ‘세노바메이트’ 훨훨…SK바팜, 올 매출 1조 넘나 수익성 증명한 에이피알…실적 우상향에 신사업까지[클릭e종목] "外人, 돌아왔구나"…코스피 추세 전환 신호일까 상장 첫 성적표 스페이스X, 2분기 매출 11조…전망치 웃돌았지만 "文때 부동산 설거지, 李땐 주식 설거지?"…2030 자조에 담긴 '포모 후폭풍' 긴 터널의 끝?…순환매 이어 반도체

5 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC280 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔜 [코인 과세 임박]③ 개인은 과세·법인은 대기…거래소 ‘환전소’ 우려 2027년부터 개인 투자자는 가상자산(코인) 양도·대여로 얻은 연간 소득 중 250만원을 넘는 금액에 지방소득세를 포함해 22%를 내야 한다. 개인에 대한 과세 일정과 방식은 정해졌지만 법인의 가상자산 투자 가능 여부는 아직 확정되지 않았다. 1년반 전 예고된 법인 가상자산 시장 개방은 여전히 준비 단계에 머물러 있다. 금융당국은 상장사와 전문투자자 등록법인 약 3500곳의 투자·재무 목적 매매를 시범 허용하겠다고 발표했지만 가이드라인 마련이 늦어지며 일정이 밀렸다. 개인 과세는 예정대로 다가오는데 법인 매수 기반 마련은 지연되면서 국내 거래소의 거래와 유동성이 동시에 약해질 수 있다는 우려가 나온다. https://www.bloter.net/news/article

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hanyangresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 407,429 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“한양증권 리서치(스몰캡)” (@hanyangresearch), 2,170 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hanyangresearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.