https://t.me/HANAchina/67063
❤1
Channel
@sejongdata2013
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,442subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001327307590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sejongdata2013 |
| Description | 2015년부터 시장 분석과 정보를 제공해온 세종기업데이터는 유사투자자문업자로서 투자 판단에 참고할 수 있는 다양한 데이터를 제공합니다. 본 서비스는 투자 권유가 아닌 정보 제공 목적이며, 모든 투자 결정과 결과에 대한 책임은 이용자 본인에게 있습니다. 앞으로도 신뢰할 수 있는 정보를 제공하기 위해 노력하겠습니다. |
| Created | 19 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sejongdata2013 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 23,442 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 23,447 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 23,449 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 23,450 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 23,449 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 23,450 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140,814 |
| Reactions total | 144 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
144 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 144 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/HANAchina/67063
❤1
장기금리가 안전화될 기미가 없네요 ㅠㅠ
*텍사스 주지사, 8/3일 PUCT와 ERCOT에 ERCOT 전력망 접속 절차를 진행 중인 모든 데이터센터 프로젝트에 대한 종합 검증 및 감사를 지시 **감사가 완료되기 전까지 해당 프로젝트는 후속 승인 절차를 진행할 수 없으며, 요건을 충족하지 못한 프로젝트는 전력망 접속이 거부될 예정. 사실상 신규 데이터센터 프로젝트에 대한 일시 중단 조치 ***이에 따라 EIA는 2027년 텍사스의 전력 수요 증가율을 +5.6%로 전망. 이는 지난 7월 전망치인 +14%에서 대폭 하향 조정된 수준으로, 기존 전망대로라면 텍사스의 전력 수요 증가율은 최근 10년래 최고치를 기록할 예정이었음 ****현재 ERCOT가 검토 중인 전력망 접속 신청 규모는 약 474GW로, 텍사스의 역대 최대 전력수요의 5배를 상회. 앞서 ERCOT는 지난 4월 텍사스의 …
❤1
과거 주가고점에서 애널들의 추정치이익vs실제이익
https://naver.me/G0pmIPvg
❤5
유가가 급등하면서 10년물 국채금리가 다시 4.7꺼지 올라왔네요 ㅠ
❤4
https://t.me/EMchina/32254
코스닥 900 코멘트에 대한 AS https://contents.premium.naver.com/sejongdata/sejongdata0304/contents/260810111614248pc
저도 이 이야기 공감 많이 됩니다! ㅎㅎ
요즘 제프 딘, 하사비스 등 구글 퇴사 이야기 나오면서 어수선한데요. 제미나이 성능 이야기도 많고.. 장기간 웹서비스 만들고 운영해 본 민감한 입장에서 좋은 부분도 하나 말씀드리자면.. 구글 검색엔진에 붙은 'AI 개요' 이거 나름대로 쓸만해요. 한 동안 안 쓰던 구글 검색 다시 쓰기 시작했네요. 그리고 특이점은 속도가 미친듯이 빠릅니다. 도대체 어케했노.. 정확도도 점점 올라가는 듯. 이 부분이 나름대로 터닝 포인트가 될 수 있다고 보는 중입니다. 저부터도 안 쓰기 시작하던 구글 검색창에 뭐 때려 넣던 걸 최근에 다시 쓰고 있으니. 급한 건 구글 검색으로 다시 ㄱㄱ
❤12
분위기 확실히 많이 바뀌었음. 5월만 해도 내 어닝은 하늘을 뚫을 어닝이다! 하고 다들 뇌절가는 분위기인데 요새 투자자들 논리 보면 LTA나 배당 등 관점이 뭔가 많이 디펜스하기 급급한 쪽으로 변했음. 어닝이 잘나오냐 아니냐가 중요한게 아니라 뇌절해도 믿어주는 분위기냐 아니냐가 중요한데 그게 많이 바뀜.
❤13
21세기 들어서 가장 높다네요 ㄷㄷ https://t.me/yeouidoslave/2063
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @sejongdata2013. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 176,008 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“세종기업데이터” (@sejongdata2013), 23,442 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sejongdata2013.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.