Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

알렉스

@Alex_briefing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,674subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420265139
TypeChannel
Username@Alex_briefing
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alex_briefing

Growth

1,6661,6741,6707 August 2026 — 1,666 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,666 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,671 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,674 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,665–1,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:171,674+3
10 Aug 2026, 22:111,671+5
7 Aug 2026, 08:321,666no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:201,666first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 1,674 subscribers
Avg views / post
308
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held24 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,399
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6077.9%
👍1418.2%
🤝22.60%
👏11.30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC194 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#금리인상 가능성 하락을 눈여겨 볼게 아니라 이유가 중요. 경기 악화로 인한 금리 인상 가능성 하락일 수 있어서 호재가 아닐 수 있음. 시장에 굴릴 돈이 없다는 얘기라.

3

7 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC141 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinnesskr

[분석 "美 고용 감소, BTC 상승 제한 요인"] 온체인 분석업체 헙지(Hupzy·구 스팟온체인)는 미국의 7월 비농업 고용이 2만3000명 감소하면서 연준의 9월 금리 인상 가능성이 70%에서 40%로 급락했지만, 고용시장 악화가 비트코인 상승폭을 제한할 수 있다고 분석했다. 헙지는 코베이시레터 데이터를 인용해 "7월 고용은 시장 예상치인 8만5000명 증가를 10만8000명 밑돌았으며, 2020년 코로나 사태 이후 세 번째로 큰 월간 고용 감소다. 6월 수치도 기존보다 3만7000명 하향 조정됐다"고 설명했다. 이어 "금리 인상 가능성 하락 자체는 위험자산에 호재지만, 이를 촉발한 경기 약화는 위험회피 요인이다. 다음 달에도 고용 감소세가 이어지는지 지켜봐야 한다"고 덧붙였다. https://coinness.com/news/1165022

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC239 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#FOLKS 1D: 구조는 그림과 같고, 현재 1번 추세전환선 돌파 후 조정, 이후 T1까지는 다녀왔습니다. 저점인 f이탈만 아니라면 T3~T4정도까지 타겟일수 있습니다. 다만 진입 구간은 벌써 지난 종목같고, 최대 저항 구간이 T2~T3 구간이라 여기서 저항 여부를 좀 봐야할거 같아요.

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC252 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#KGEN 1D: 해당 종목 일봉 구조. 1번 추세전환선은 돌파하고, 조정역시 단기 저점인 f1 이탈없이 진행. 아직 T1도 도달 못함(=해당 매물대 돌파 못했단 얘기) 4시간~일봉 지표들이 다소 높은 상태라 재차 하락조정 줄 여지가 높다고 봄. 조정하락에서 f1 이탈이 나오지 않는다면 위로 타겟 체크.

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC251 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ON 1D 추가: 여기서 굳이 매수 물량 정리하는 이유는 일봉상 하락다이버가 다중 지표에서 걸릴 가능성이 높아서입니다. 어디까지 쏘고 떨어질지를 모르는 상황이 온거고, 스토케지표만 아직 과매수 구간 진입을 못하고 있어서 이 부분만 더 체크해보면 좋겠습니다.

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC248 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ON 1D 업데이트: T3. 매수물량은 모두 정리하고 T4~T5(기존 브리핑 참조) 오버슈팅 나오면 숏포지션을 고민.

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC318 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#한화에어로스페이스 1W(선형/로그) 업데이트: 주봉~월봉상 큰 규모의 헤솔 수렴이 진행될 수도 있으나 수렴 형태는 가이드로만 현재 보는게 제 입장이고, 만에 하나라도 헤솔 챠트로 진행된다면 20만원대 한화에어를 다시 볼 수도 있기는 하나, 헤솔 타겟을 100% 모두 채우는 경우는 생각보다 낮은 확률입니다. 보통은 타겟의 60~70% 정도에서 지지받는 경우가 더 많습니다.

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinnesskr

[美 상원, 클래리티법 표결 9월로 연기] 크립토 인 아메리카 진행자 엘리노어테렛이 폴리티코를 인용해 "미국 상원이 클래리티법(CLARITY) 표결을 9월로 연기하기로 결정했다"고 전했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164959

7 Aug 2026, 01:59 UTC284 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#LG화학 1D 업데이트: 크게 동그라미친 단기 하락구간에 대한 추세전환(상승)선은 273000원입니다. 돌파 후 단기 저점(f) 이탈이 나오지 않는다면 위로 T4까지 타겟이 열립니다. 단 돌파 이전까지는 저점을 더 낮출수도 있습니다.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Alex_briefing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“알렉스” (@Alex_briefing), 1,674 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alex_briefing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.