Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

리버모어의 트레이딩 노트

@lmtradingnote

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004339173825
TypeChannel
Username@lmtradingnote
Descriptionhttps://x.com/Livermore_LM
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lmtradingnote

Growth

767 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:0176no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5376first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.0%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.8
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total717
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
71
Videos
2
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

✅ “주식 녹아서 집 포기” 코스피 급락에 계약금 연체·미납 속출 [부동산360] https://n.news.naver.com/article/016/0002681280

9 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WeCryptoTogetherPhoto

💰 최근에 오해받고 있는 이미지 세일러 오렌지점. 옛날부터 마이클 세일러가 소셜에 이 사진을 올리면 새로운 비트코인을 매수했음을 암시했음. 하지만 최근 마이크로 스트래티지는 $STRC $100 맞추는게 최우선이라 비트를 살 수 없음. 즉 오렌지 점 사진을 올리더라도 비트를 산게 아님. 그럼에도 소셜은 알아보지도 않고 세일러가 비트를 샀다고 함. 단, 최근 $STRC 의 가격이 $95 까지 회복하고 있는 것도 주목할만함. 진짜 잘~하면 이번 광복절 전후로 $100을 터치하면서 $STRC 스팀팩이 발현되고, 지지부진한 비트코인의 상승곡선을 들어올려줄 가능성은 있음.

9 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emperorcoinPhoto

다음 최고의 에어드랍은 RWA에서 나올 것 굉장히 유명한 프로젝트들만 있는데 유명하다는뜻은 지금 하기엔 좀 늦은감이.... #RWA

9 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC40 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @stoner8740Photo

정말 바이오에 대한 인식이 이정도일줄은 충격적이네요 주식투자에서 바이오만큼 매력적인 섹터가 없는데 이런댓글만보니 실적주만 좋아하는 사람들이 많네요

9 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Yeouido_Lab

“메모리주 급락 끝났다”…모건스탠리, 삼전·SK하닉 재조명 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002681373?rc=N&ntype=RANKING&sid=001

9 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @waitstudyPhoto

왼쪽 : 2025 10.10 오른쪽 : 2026 8.8 크립토 볼륨은 토토토토토막남

9 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emperorcoinPhoto

이번 주 블랙록은 $693M 상당 비트코인 매수 전체 ETF로는 $853M으로 15주 만에 최고치 경신 #BTC

9 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC44 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emperorcoinPhoto

NFT를 부활시킨 로빈후드 지금 다시 옛날 처럼 WL메타도 돌고 매우 불장임 #NFT

9 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @airdr0p_labPhoto

🟢 비트코인의 근황: BIP-110 도입을 둘러싼 체인 분열 ✅ BIP-110? -비트코인 블록체인에 임의 데이터를 기록하는 행위를 약 1년간 제한하자는 제안 -비트코인을 데이터 저장소가 아닌 화폐·결제 네트워크라는 본래 목적에 집중시키고, 스팸성 데이터와 노드 운영 부담을 줄이는 것이 목표 -BIP-110이 실제 적용될 경우 비트코인 위에서 데이터를 활용하는 Ordinals, BRC-20 등은 직접적인 타격​을 받을 수 있음 ✅ BIP-110 강행 -BIP-110은 채굴자들의 시그널링을 통해 활성화를 추진했지만 실제 지지율은 약 2~2.5% 수준에 그침 -대부분의 대형 마이닝풀은 BIP-110을 지원하지 않는 상황 -그럼에도 BIP-110을 실행하는 일부 노드들은 블록 높이 961,632부터 BIP-110 시그널이 없는 블록을

9 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC47 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @waitstudyPhoto

대충 상승장이 온다는말 🧘

9 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emperorcoinPhoto

2025년 1월 이후 가장 저조한 성과를 보이는 자산은? - 은 +107% - 구리 +66% - 금 +60% - 나스닥 +38% - 러셀 +31% - BTC -35% - ETH -47% -알트코인 -57% #비교

8 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://x.com/Livermore_LM/status/2086132939432271880?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lmtradingnote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 861,742 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“리버모어의 트레이딩 노트” (@lmtradingnote), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lmtradingnote.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.