4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,174–1,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 10:09
1,177
-5
11 Aug 2026, 13:38
1,182
+7
7 Aug 2026, 23:32
1,175
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:10
1,175
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 1,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,585
Reactions total
79
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
64
81.0%
🙏
11
13.9%
👍
4
5.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇰🇷 8월 20일부터 '트래블룰 100만원 기준'변경
✅ 정부는 특금법 시행령 개정안을 통해 트래블룰 적용 기준을 변경
📂 변경사항
🟢기존 : 100만원 이상 전송 > 트레블룰 적용 | 100만원 미만 > 적용 제외
🟢변경 : 1원, 1달러 상당의 가상자산 모두에게 트레블룰 적용
🟢자금세탁방지(AML) 기준에 맞춰 가상자산 거래의 투명성을 높이기 위한 조치
✍ 8/20일부터 꽤나 불편해지겠네요. 거래소 간 이동이나 개인 지갑 입출금 시 소액이라도 트레블룰이 적용이 되게됩니다.
기사보러가기
#국내
[스트래티지 우선주 STRC, 6월 저점 대비 30% 이상 상승]
스트래티지 우선주 STRC가 6월 저점 대비 30% 이상 상승, 약 94 달러에 거래되고 있다. 코인데스크는 "스트래티지가 비트코인 매각과 40억 달러 규모의 미 달러 보유고를 통해 배당금 지급 능력을 강화하는 한편, STRC의 연간 배당률을 12%로 유지했다 비트코인이 6만 달러 이상에서 안정세를 보이고 있다는 점도 긍정적 요인"이라고 설명했다.
https://coinness.com/news/1164828
제가 삼프로 티비에 출연하게 되었습니다. 항상 구독자의 입장이었다가 이렇게 직접 출연하게 되니 감회가 매우 새롭네요.
구독자 300만의 채널에서 무엇을 이야기를 해야 업계에 조금이나마 도움이 될 수 있을까 고민하다가 "과세"이야기를 좀 해봤습니다.
그냥 단순히 "과세 유예해주세요."라는 이야기를 하려는 것이 아니라, 리서치 회사의 대표로써 왜 현재 크립토 과세가 시장의 왜곡을 일으킬 수 있는지, 그리고 이게 왜 더 많은 정부 개입과 규제를 야기할 수 있는지를 이야기 해봤습니다.
1. 현재 정부의 정책 기조와 과세 체계는 서로 상충됩니다. 정부는 법인의 거래소 계좌를 점진적으로 허용하겠다는 방향을 제시하고 있습니다. 이는 분명 업계에는 긍정적인 변화입니다. 저희처럼 벨리데이터를 운영하며 업무 특성상 가상자산을 지속적으로 취득하는 회사들은,…
그럼 지금 코인장에 대해 적용해보면 어떨까...
많은 분들이 지적하시는 것처럼 바닥에서 나오는 "명확한 이유와 함께하는 하락 & 비트코인이 망할 것 같다는 느낌"은 아직 받지 못한 것이 사실입니다.
포인트는 "명확해보이는 이유가 붙은 하락"이예요. 그래야 "망할 것 같다는 두려움"이 제대로 들거든요.
과연 이번에는 다를지 같을지 모르겠지만 시간이 지나면 저희 투자인생에 있어 또 하나의 귀중한 데이터베이스가 되겠죠.
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiktooofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“직장인투자자A🥇” (@jiktooofficial), 1,177 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiktooofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.