Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 79 days, net -2,262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,269–28,209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 04:26
25,608
-33
25 Oct 2026, 02:37
25,641
-291
24 Oct 2026, 02:36
25,932
-8
23 Oct 2026, 02:27
25,940
-247
22 Oct 2026, 05:10
26,187
-425
21 Oct 2026, 01:01
26,612
-32
19 Oct 2026, 23:55
26,644
-34
18 Oct 2026, 20:28
26,678
-31
17 Oct 2026, 17:09
26,709
-14
16 Oct 2026, 15:40
26,723
-45
15 Oct 2026, 15:09
26,768
-8
14 Oct 2026, 15:09
26,776
-13
13 Oct 2026, 06:11
26,789
-15
9 Oct 2026, 01:36
26,804
-79
4 Oct 2026, 15:41
26,883
-84
26 Sept 2026, 11:36
26,967
-109
19 Sept 2026, 09:40
27,076
-93
16 Sept 2026, 20:01
27,169
-95
14 Sept 2026, 21:59
27,264
-14
13 Sept 2026, 07:38
27,278
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.88%
avg views ÷ 25,608 subscribers
Avg views / post
482
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held
22 (7 March 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total
482
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 21:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
150
77.7%
👏
23
11.9%
🎉
11
5.70%
❤
9
4.66%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤝 Diverse × SM C&C
Diverse has signed an MOU with SM C&C to explore new digital experiences combining artist IP with CRETA’s multiverse and AI avatar technologies.
Learn more about the collaboration! 🌐
🔗 buly.kr/HHfXJID
#CRETA #AIAvatar #DigitalEntertainment
✅ Likes & Retweets
🎮 What if anyone could create a game with just an idea?
In a recent interview, Diverse CEO Sang-yoon Lee shares his vision for making game creation accessible to everyone through CRETA.
Read the full interview
✅ Likes & Retweets
Big news! 🎉
Anthony Borquez has joined CRETA as Chief Marketing Officer.
His decades of experience across game publishing, mobile gaming, and global business development will help drive the next chapter of CRETA.
Welcome aboard! 🚀
#Creta #CMO #Game #Gaming #Publishing
✅Likes & Retweets
✨The new CRETA website is now live!
We've refreshed the design, updated our roadmap, and added the latest information about the CRETA ecosystem, platform, and upcoming milestones.
Take a look at what's next for CRETA.
👉 creta.world
✅ Likes & Retweets
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
🎮For those who build games,
🕹️For those who play them,
❤️For those who live by them.
An ecosystem owned by everyone 🌍
This is the reality CRETA is building.
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
Hospitals. Banks. Government offices 🏛️
Every time, you start from zero.
One AI avatar 🤖
that moves with you across every service.
🌐 Project DI.
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
🎮 Game development used to be strictly for developers.
No code, no 3D tools, no starting point 💻
🤖 AI is shattering that barrier.
Your idea 💡 is now your game engine.
CRETA Studio.
#Creta #CRETAStudio #AI #Gaming
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
What if players could become creators❓
What if they could monetize💸 those creations?
CRETA is building that reality.
#CRETA #Web3Gaming #Gaming #Creator
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
Announcement.
The CRETA “Staking” service is now open.
Please click the URL below on the mobile phone where your wallet is installed, then press the “Connect Wallet” button. After selecting your wallet and logging in, you may apply for the staking service.
https://staking.creta.world/
No separate sign-up is required. You only need to log in with the wallet that holds your CRETA tokens.
There are two staking prod…
공지드립니다.
크레타 '스테이킹' 서비스가 오픈되었습니다.
지갑이 설치된 핸드폰에서 아래 URL을 클릭하신후, '지갑연결' 버튼을 누르세요. 사용하시는 지갑을 선택한 후 로그인하여 스테이킹 서비스를 신청하시면 됩니다.
https://staking.creta.world/
별도의 회원가입이 필요없고, 크레타를 보유하고 계신 지갑에서 로그인만 하시면 됩니다.
스테이킹 상품은 3개월(연4%), 6개월(연5%) 2가지이며, 만기이전에 취소하시면 이자가 지급되지 않습니다.
아울러, 지갑의 잔고가 스테이킹 수량보다 부족해지면 자동으로 스테이킹이 취소되니 꼭 유념하시기 바랍니다.
추가로, 고팍스에 있는 크테타 토큰을 외부 지갑으로 출금하는 방법에 대한 안내입니다.
1. 지갑설치
고팍스에서 등록을 허용하는 지갑(메타마스크, 클립, 아임토큰 등)…
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
What if Tony Stark created the tanks?
#Creta #FortressW #Tank #Ironman #TonyStark #RDJ #Marvel #Crossbow
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
"Creta: Life Beyond Reality"
The Social Layer of Creta
Games create excitement 🎮
Communities create longevity👥
SuperClub is the social layer that connects everything in Creta.
#Creta #SuperClub #SNS #SocialMedia #Community
✅ Likes & Retweets
l Web l YouTube l
l Twitter l Twitter JP l
l Channel l Group l Discord l
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Creta_world_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LOCUS CHAIN Official @locusofficial · 18,390 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 October 2026
HamsterChain News @hamsterchainann · 24,593 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Creta_official” (@Creta_world_official), 25,608 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Creta_world_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.