Photo, posted without a caption
👍3

Channel
@assettree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
282subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003574462298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @assettree |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/assettree |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 282 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 280 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,325 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 72.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
* 바이낸스지갑 TRON 디파이 시즌2. 시즌1과 동일한듯... Tron 500개 테더 100개 1시간 이상 예치하면 n빵 대상. 반드시 join 누르고 하기. 링크 시즌1 참여하고 그대로 뒀다면 자동 참여되니 그대로 있으면 될듯...
👍3
비트겟 풀엑스 또 나옴. U2U는 선물없어 패스. LA는 펀비가 높아 관망중. BMT QUID 둘다 개꿀 유지 중. BMT는 오늘 종료 예정. 아쉽 비트겟 okx가 그나마 요즘 열일중
👍2
(리마인드) 주말에는 바낸알파 거래량 QQQB 4배 안되요!!!
👍1😢1
주말에 할게 없어서 바낸지갑 팬케이크 파밍 트라이. 미장 닫혀있는 시간동안만 유지하기. QQQb가 쏠쏠했는데 주말 4배수 알파거래 막혀서 이율 급락할듯해서 NVDAb로 해봄. 이건 물리면 전량 주식으로 바뀌어 존버해야할 수 있으니 파밍 자체 특성을 잘 알아야함. 이전 글에 이런 내용을 적어논것임.
['가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준 폐지' 특금법, 국무회의 거쳐 20일 시행] 가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준을 폐지하는 내용의 특정금융정보법 개정안이 11일 국무회의에 오른다고 디지털애셋이 전했다. 국무회의 의결을 거치면 오는 20일부터 시행된다. 개정안은 가상자산사업자가 100만원 이상 디지털자산을 이전하는 경우에만 관련 정보를 제공하던 것에서 금액과 상관없이 이전할 때마다 정보를 제공하게 하도록 정했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164985 원문보기 : https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42351
기사 원문
나는 몇번째일까?
바낸알파 QQQB 월~금에만 4배 적용. 주말은 1배 적용. 시간은 UTC 기준. (슬프다 ㅜㅜ) - From Monday 00:00 UTC to Friday 23:59 UTC: Trading selected bStocks receives 4× Alpha Trading Volume, while trading all other bStocks receives 1× Alpha Trading Volume. - From Saturday 00:00 UTC to Sunday 23:59 UTC: Trading all bStocks receives 1× Alpha Trading Volume.
😱2
* 하이닉스 ADR 갭 쉽게 볼수 있는 곳. https://raoni.xyz/adr 15분봉이라 긴거 보기 힘듬. https://adr-gap-chart-production.up.railway.app/ 여기는 시간단위 조절되니 자유롭게 보기 좋음. https://www.tradingview.com/chart 트레이딩뷰 수식으로 보기 수식 = HIP3XYZ:SKHYUSDC.P/HIP3XYZ:SKHYNIXUSDC.P*10 근데 무료는 일봉만 볼수 있음.
❤1
🪙DappOS : 코인마켓캡 신청서 제출 - DappOS 의 토큰 $DOS가 코인마켓캡에 신청서 제출했다네요 - TGE 곧 인가봄 「 출처 」 #DappOS
👍2
이번에 생산적금융 ISA라고 혜택을 늘렸다고 생색내는데 이게 왜 안좋냐면.... 한국사람은 한국경제가 망하면 일자리도 잃게됨. 실업자가 되면 그동안 투자한 자산을 까먹고 살아야하는데 자산이 한국주식 관련이라면 같이 망해서 리스크 관리가 안됨. 예를들어 미국이 -40%가면 한국은 그냥 -60-80%감. 근데 생산적금융 ISA는 국내주식만 사라고 강요함. 해외주식이나 원자재 등에 매수가 안되 자산배분이 불가능한 계좌임. 근데 이렇게 위험한 것을 그것도 심지어 청년들에게 혜택 더 준다고 꼬시고 있음. 그러면서 거의 완벽하게 자산배분을 통해 리스크 관리가 가능했던 일반 ISA 계좌의 혜택은 줄여버림. 이거 만든 사람은 아예 투자를 해본적이 없거나 두뇌가 빠가인듯... 아님 고도의 삥뜯기 전략??!
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @assettree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 755,802 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“함께크는 자산나무” (@assettree), 282 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/assettree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.