Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 94 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,839–6,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 09:06
5,877
-4
5 Nov 2026, 09:49
5,881
-1
2 Nov 2026, 05:26
5,882
-6
30 Oct 2026, 06:34
5,888
-2
27 Oct 2026, 02:07
5,890
+2
23 Oct 2026, 15:18
5,888
+3
20 Oct 2026, 15:28
5,885
+25
17 Oct 2026, 10:14
5,860
-4
14 Oct 2026, 17:01
5,864
-3
11 Oct 2026, 10:42
5,867
-3
5 Oct 2026, 05:55
5,870
-16
26 Sept 2026, 11:42
5,886
-17
17 Sept 2026, 04:16
5,903
-5
13 Sept 2026, 01:38
5,908
-20
9 Sept 2026, 02:16
5,928
-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:56
5,937
-13
30 Aug 2026, 17:45
5,950
-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:11
5,954
-3
24 Aug 2026, 05:47
5,957
-8
20 Aug 2026, 10:26
5,965
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 5,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
784
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
45 (4 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
14,117
Reactions total
137
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
551 reactions across 37 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
246
44.6%
❤
214
38.8%
🔥
91
16.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[서클 ”아크, 2027년 지분증명 전환 추진“]
달러 연동 스테이블코인 USDC 발행사 서클(Circle)이 3분기 실적발표를 통해 ”아크 메인넷은 2027년 지분증명(PoS) 방식으로의 전환을 추진하고 있다“고 밝혔다. 이어 ”아크 메인넷은 출시 첫날 100곳 이상의 기관 및 생태계 참여자가 합류했으며, USDC가 통합됐다. 초기 밸리데이터 그룹에는 글로벌 금융 시스템 운영사 등 주요 기관들이 참여했다. 메인넷 출시와 동시에 ARC 토큰 발행을 완료했으며, 초기 발행량은 총 100억개로 설정됐다. 이에 따라 서클은 레이어1 블록체인의 네트워크 토큰을 발행한 상장사가 됐다. ARC는 아크 네트워크의 보안, 유틸리티, 거버넌스 조율 등 기능을 가진 네이티브 토큰으로 설계됐다“고 설명했다. 앞서 코인니스는 서클이 ARC 프리세일 매출로 1억 8…
????
[”美 중간선거 결과, BTC에 최상의 시나리오“]
비트코인(BTC) 맥시멀리스트 프레드 크루거(Fred Krueger)는 미국 중간선거 결과가 BTC에 최상의 시나리오라고 평가했다. 그는 X를 통해 ”선거 결과가 명확해졌고, 민주당의 텍사스 승리로 인공지능(AI) 관련 투자의 매력이 떨어지고 있다. 정부 부채 문제와 통화 발행도 계속될 것이다. 투자자금은 새로운 투자 테마를 필요로 하며, BTC가 가장 유력한 대안“이라고 분석했다.
https://coinness.com/news/1174323
[美 중간선거 패배에 트럼프 관련 암호화폐 약세...TRUMP 1년간 79.52%↓]
미국 민주당이 중간선거에서 승리하면서 양원을 장악한 가운데 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령 일가와 관련된 주요 암호화폐 3종이 최근 24시간 동안 일제히 하락했다. 코인마켓캡에 따르면 트럼프의 공식 밈코인 오피셜트럼프(TRUMP)는 7.26% 하락한 1.47달러에 거래되고 있으며, 최근 1년간 낙폭은 79.52%에 달했다. 영부인 멜라니아의 밈코인 MELANIA는 24시간 동안 3.92% 내린 0.07157달러로, 1년 전보다 26.88% 하락했다. 월드리버티파이낸셜(WLFI)은 24시간 동안 2.12% 내린 0.04878달러에 거래되고 있으며, 최근 1년간 55% 하락한 것으로 나타났다.
https://coinness.com/news/1174330
트럼프 대통령이 미국 중간선거와 관련해 흥미로운 메시지를 남겼습니다.
미국 현지시간 11월 3일 오후 10시 37분, 트럼프 대통령이 자신의 트루스소셜에 다음과 같은 글을 올렸습니다.
"나는 이번 선거의 투표용지에 이름이 없었다. 만약 내가 출마했다면 압도적인 승리를 거뒀을 것이다. 이 점을 알아주길 바란다."
이게 무슨 의미인지 간단하게 설명해 보겠습니다.
미국은 대통령 임기가 4년이고, 그 중간인 2년마다 의회 선거를 치릅니다. 이번 선거에서는 하원 전체 435석과 상원 일부 의석을 새롭게 선출합니다.
중요한 것은 이번 선거에 트럼프 대통령 본인이 출마하는 것은 아니라는 점입니다...
하지만 중간선거는 통상 현직 대통령의 국정 운영에 대한 평가 성격을 갖기 때문에, 트럼프 대통령 입장에서도 상당히 중요한 선거입니다.
만약 공화…
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @bonghyunbrother. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“봉천동 가치투자 연구소(봉현이형과 함께하는 우량자산 장기투자 모임)” (@bonghyunbrother), 5,877 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonghyunbrother.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.