업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 아이콘(ICX) 거래 유의 종목 지정 안내 2026-08-28 16:30:00

Channel
부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,825subscribers
-344 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001281194841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stay_news |
| Created | 20 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stay_news |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 7,825 | -38 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 7,863 | -55 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 7,918 | -30 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 7,948 | -29 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:06 | 7,977 | -22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 7,999 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 8,027 | -31 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 8,058 | -24 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 8,082 | -15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 8,097 | -40 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 8,137 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 8,147 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 8,168 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 8,169 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 8,169 | first reading |
Engagement
281 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.97%
- avg views ÷ 7,825 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 154
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.831%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 281 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 281 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,463 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 49s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
341 reactions across 86 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 142 | 41.6% | |
| ❤ | 124 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 11.1% | |
| 🤬 | 26 | 7.62% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 281 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 281 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 신세틱스(SNX) 거래지원 종료 안내 (9/28 15:00) 2026-08-28 16:00:06
크라켄 온체인 총괄자가 내일 $INK 큰거온다고함 nado단 성불하나요?
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 인터폴드(FOLD), 이유알코인(EURC) 원화 마켓 추가 2026-08-28 11:11:29
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 이유알코인(EURC) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-08-28 10:49:49
폴란드 올림픽 위원장, 암호화폐 관련 뇌물 혐의 수사로 체포 검찰은 Zondacrypto의 CEO가 규제 장애물을 해결하기 위해 Radosław Piesiewicz에게 40,000유로의 시계를 주었다는 주장을 조사하고 있다. 출처 #폴란드 #올림픽
📈 CASHCAT 신고가 갱신 중 이번 로빈후드 / MEME 테마의 가장 큰 수혜를 받고 있는 종목이니 계속 체크하시길 바랍니다 https://pro.ave.ai/token/0x020bfc650a365f8bb26819deaabf3e21291018b4-robinhood #CASHCAT
❤2
📈 $0.25030 @cashcat_price
📈올해 AI 업계에 벌어지고 있는 일 source - Anthropic은 자금을 끌어모으고 있고, 인재도 계속 유입되고 있음 - OpenAI는 일부 인재를 잃고 있지만, 여전히 최상위권에 있음 - SpaceX/Tesla 메가코퍼레이션은 모든 곳에서 모든 걸 동시에 하려 들 것 - Google은 DeepMind의 Demis가 떠난 뒤 정체성을 다시 찾으려는 중 - Meta의 Mark는 여전히 오픈 AI 낙관론자이며, 동시에 중독성 강한 영상 앱도 가지고 있음 - NVIDIA도 모든 걸 직접 하려 들 가능성이 있음 - 뭐든지 전부 Situation이라고 부르는 새로운 AI 뉴스 채널도 생김 - AGI에 대한 논의는 이제 초지능으로 넘어갔음 - 재귀적 자기개선(RSI)이 가장 뜨거운 화두가 됨 - 이제 과학적 발견 자체를 자동화할…
체이널리시스는 2025년 전 세계 암호화폐 과세 활동이 4,570억 달러를 넘어섰다고 밝혔다. 체이나리시스에 따르면 전 세계 온체인 암호화폐 과세 대상 활동 규모는 2025년에 최소 4,570억 달러에 달할 것으로 예상되며, 그중 미국이 1,126억 달러를 차지할 것으로 전망됩니다. 출처 #국제
업비트(Upbit) 공지 ThunderCore 네트워크 종료에 따른 썬더코어(TT) 출금 중단(종료) 및 거래지원 종료 예정일 변경 안내 (09/01 09:00 ~) 2026-08-27 18:19:25
📣 계속해서 엄청난 우상향을 보여주고 있는 상황인데요 토큰은 대략, 약 10개월 전부터 시작한 플젝이라고 보면 될듯합니다 요즘 상당히 온체인 정보가 투명하게 공개되서 좀 편리한 면도 있네요. Ave.ai 온체인 데이터를 보면 데브가 계속 매수하면서 천천히 코인도 우상향을 하는 그림을 보여주고 있네요 * Ave.AI 통해 온체인 데이터 확인할 분들 여기(링크) l 홈페이지 : 시총 약 $450K : 토큰 홀더 650명 수준 : 총 공급량의 1% 소각 완료 📣엠버서더 출처 보러가기 : LINK
Showing the 12 most recent of 281 posts we hold for @stay_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@stay_trading · 5944 posts투자하는 30대 직장인 정보방🚀
@naverblog30 · 1,3173 posts하양이아빠의 암호화폐이야기
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,7023 postsT.A Crypto
@yul_papa · 8,1503 postsJerrY Alpha
@jerryalpha · 7,1792 posts아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 12,0431 post코인시티 x MEMECITY
@GAORI777 · 11,0641 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,3191 post코인포
@coinpo2 · 6,9381 post코인광장(coinsquare)
@coinsquarelw · 1,1921 postCRYPTO GHIDORAH
@crypto_ghidorah · 1821 post나혼자매매-차트&온체인
@easychartgo · 5,7241 post엔지니어뷰
@eng999view · 1,7611 post인디고차일드 코인&경제 그룹 (Indigochild korea crypto community)
@indigochildcoin · 3,3931 postWEB 2.5를 꿈꾸는 JackpotDAO🥭
@jackpot777DAO · 3,1681 postJason's nest
@jason_nest · 5,3271 post크립토 원정대
@legoleecm777 · 7,1541 post롱텀성장투자
@longtermgrowthinvest · 7511 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,9341 post말하는 토끼
@malto0115 · 5,6611 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,6501 postNOAH NFT WORLD
@noahnft · 21 post코인 친목방
@tkqltmbtc · 71 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@shrimp_notice · 28,81411 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,9733 posts불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,1883 posts스테이 트레이딩 채널
@stay_trading · 5943 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,1392 postsCRYPTO Sea
@crypt0_sea · 15,8502 posts텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,4672 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1202 posts성연이의 바이브
@sy_vibe · 1,4042 posts쉬었음청년 집가고싶다
@Iwanttogohome09 · 5,4581 post김프 출입국 사무소
@KimchiPremium · 9,7221 postPASA 공지방
@PASACREW · 6,3741 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,1711 post저지능 트레이딩
@cadudududu · 8011 postCashcat Price
@cashcat_price · 241 post돌비콩의 투자정복
@dolbikong · 9,5921 post피린이
@forevernft · 12,1891 postTrends & Tips 😎⚡️
@honeylifetip · 9,2881 postManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 15,9401 postWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 22,6111 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,9341 post원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 14,9921 postPAIGU - Pagu's AI Diary
@paigudiary · 791 post약국
@sidejobvip · 2,0061 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“부의길목에서 🦅” (@stay_news), 7,825 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stay_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.