Channel
@bongbong_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,888subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002353721854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bongbong_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bongbong_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 2,888 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 2,890 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 2,895 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 2,895 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,705 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 87.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
크립토에서 보낸 시간 후회하지말고 연습했다 생각하래요😣 여튼 저 부분 말고도 글이 괜찮아서, 그리 길지도 않고 "만약 믿음을 잃어가고 있다면, 크립토에서 보낸 시간들을 후회하지 마십시오... 그것을 새로운 방향으로 나아가기 위한 연료로 사용하십시오. 다른 분야보다 10배는 더 빠르게 일어났던 모든 배움을 챙겨서, 당신이 매료되는 그 어떤 곳이든 기하급수적으로 성장한 자신을 향하게 하십시오. 크립토는 당신을 분석적인 기계로 연마시켰습니다. 미래에 대한 당신의 이론들에 실시간 시장 피드백을 제공했습니다. 또한 탐욕, 심리학, 경제학, 거시적 및 미시적 힘에 대해 가르쳐 주었습니다. 그 지식은 어디에나 적용될 수 있습니다. 이제 세상은 밈코인 차트처럼 움직이고 있습니다. 크립토 그 자체가 최종 목적지였던 적은 결코 없었습니다. 그것은 앞으로 다…
$CASHCAT live on Robinhood spot
2020년 Uniswap vs. SushiSwap: 뱀파이어 어택의 시작 2020년 8월, 익명의 개발자 Chef Nomi는 Uniswap의 구조를 포크해 SushiSwap을 출시 당시 Uniswap에는 자체 토큰이 없었지만, SushiSwap은 SUSHI를 발행해 다음과 같은 제안을 내놓았습니다. Uniswap LP 토큰을 SushiSwap에 예치하면 SUSHI를 지급하겠다. LP들은 높은 보상을 받기 위해 Uniswap의 유동성 지분을 SushiSwap 컨트랙트에 예치했고, 약 2주 뒤 마이그레이션을 통해 8억~10억 달러 이상의 유동성이 SushiSwap으로 이전됐습니다. 기존 프로토콜의 사용자와 유동성 공급자에게 자체 토큰을 지급해 유동성을 빼앗는 이 전략은 이후 ‘뱀파이어 어택’의 대표적인 사례가 됐습니다. 하지만 성공 직…
이녀석들 그냥 쌓여있던거 다 방출중인가 요새 왜이래
Arc 메인넷 9/16
올것이 왔구나
$CASHCAT listed on Bybit futures
이 역겨운 rebase shit이 rwa와 결합되면서 성공적이고 효율적인 폰지를 표방한다는게 좀 신기할 따름. DEX전사들은 항상 한발 빨랐음. 다만 시기가 좀 늦게 메타가 다시 돌 뿐.. 다만 이런 사례로 생각할 수 있는건 여전히 DEX는 어떠한 실험하기에는 최적의 테스트베드 이며 여기에서 나올 수 있는 새로운 형태의 금융상품은 여전히 꿈과 희망을 팔기에는 적합하다는 것. 모든 것이 다 죽고 폐허가 된 지금 크립토에서는 오히려 관심과 자금이 DEX로 쏠리는 현상이 있기에 지속해서 모니터링을 해야되지 않나는 생각.
❤2👍1
arc에서 굳이 하나 베팅해보라면 arcat이 나쁘지 않을듯. 최초 발행 내러티브 + dyor 런치패드 https://radardex.pro/
참고로 븐브밈코 Bulla도 dwf 작품입니다
🔥1
RH, ARC도 DWF가 작업하고 있다는 찌라시가 도는데 체크해볼 필요있을듯 Arc쪽은 특히 카발번들이 심한데 일반 플레이어 지갑도 있지만 브릿지 타고 들어온 자금 출처가 프레시월렛이 많음
일주일간 침묵했지만, 친구를 대신해 목소리를 내기로 했다 내 친구는 $DEXE를 거래하는 과정에서 170만 달러에 가까운 손실을 입었다. DEXE 가격은 하루 만에 46달러에서 폭포수처럼 무너져 5달러까지 떨어졌다. 하락 폭은 88%에 달했고, 사실상 제로가 된 것이나 다름없다. 하지만 이것은 시장의 정상적인 변동이 아니었다. 유명 마켓 메이커 DWF가 저지른 짓이다. 그들은 매우 영리한 방법으로 감시를 우회해 약 80만 개의 $DEXE를 전부 거래소에 쏟아부었고, 4천만 달러에 가까운 이익을 챙겼다. 이것이 거대한 싱크홀을 만들어 모든 개인 투자자들의 돈을 자기 주머니에 쓸어 담았다. 이 모든 일이 벌어지는 동안 온체인에는 어떤 경고도 없었고, 개인 투자자들이 가진 모든 모니터링 도구가 무력화됐다. 왜냐하면 이 모든 것이 온체인에서 일…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bongbong_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 363,929 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“정열맨김봉봉” (@bongbong_crypto), 2,888 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bongbong_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.