Global payments need a blockchain built to scale. Locus Chain: 🔹 Dynamic Sharding + DAG parallel processing for massive scalability 🔹Verifiable Pruning for integrity 🔹Fully P2P + Stateless Nodes, decentralized by design
👏10👍3

Channel
@locusofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
19,253subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001265519548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @locusofficial |
| Description | This is Locus Chain Foundation's official Web : https://www.locuschain.com/home Channel : https://t.me/locusofficial Group : https://t.me/locusofficialGroup Twitter : https://twitter.com/LocusChain Medium : https://medium.com/@locus_10211 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/locusofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 19,253 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 19,266 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 19,265 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 19,278 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 19,286 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 19,292 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 19,297 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 19,301 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 19,315 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 19,323 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 19,330 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 19,337 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 19,337 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (27 March 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,307 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
228 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 153 | 67.1% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 15.8% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 14.0% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Global payments need a blockchain built to scale. Locus Chain: 🔹 Dynamic Sharding + DAG parallel processing for massive scalability 🔹Verifiable Pruning for integrity 🔹Fully P2P + Stateless Nodes, decentralized by design
👏10👍3
The GENIUS Act AML comment period closed on June 9. 💳 Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe are embracing stablecoin payments. ⛓️ Blockchain is becoming the settlement layer for global finance. The question is: Which blockchain can truly scale? #LocusChain #GENIUS #Stablecoin
❤10
7월 25일에 열렸던 오프라인 로커스/크레타 행사 영상 모두 올려드렸고, 링크는 다음과 같습니다. 관심있게 한번씩 봐주시면 좋겠습니다. 감사합니다. 1부영상 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8rVy20RD-A 2부영상 https://youtu.be/Fytghmmq1TY
👍10❤2
안내드립니다. 토요일날 오프라인 행사를 통해 그간 개발된 LDEX, 미디어체인, 크레타 플랫폼(슈퍼클럽/지갑/마켓플레이스 등), 킹덤언더파이어 더라이즈 등 시연해보이고, 이대표님께서 런칭일정과 사업현황에 대해 상세 설명하셨습니다. 로커스 메인넷과 LDEX 연내 런칭을 포함해 크레타 서비스 일정도 약속했습니다. 우선 영상 공유는 편집이 되는 버전부터 나누어 내일 올려드리겠습니다. 그리고, 가격 관련해 문의가 많은데, 무슨 악재가 있는 것은 전혀 아닙니다. 기존에 일정에 대한 루머도 많고 해서 힘드셨겠지만 메인넷 및 다양한 기술과 플랫폼의 개발과 국내외 기업들과의 협업 진행은 잘 진행되고 있습니다. 최선을 다해 꼭 발표한 개발 일정들이 준수되고 사업 성과도 결실을 맷도록 해서 다같이 웃는 날이 오도록 하겠습니다. 감사합니다. 📌 Offic…
👍10
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Milliseconds matter for gaming, payments, and IoT. That's exactly why Locus Chain was designed. ✅Dynamic Sharding automatically scales as network demand increases ✅ DAG-based parallel processing handles massive volumes of concurrent transactions. ✅ BFT delivers fast transaction finality. ✅ Stateless nodes allow even IoT devices to participate directly in the network #LocusChain #Layer1 #DynamicShar…
👍8👏1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Take a first look at LDEX. Here's a preview of LDEX, our decentralized trading platform powered by Locus Chain. 🎥 https://t.co/fHFmKfZ0lR #LDEX #LocusChain #DEX #Web3 📌 Official Link ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
👍14❤2👏1🥰1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Bitcoin Layer 2s keep launching Most won't survive. The market isn't asking for higher TPS on paper. It's asking for real-time payments, gaming, and IoT Without real demand, higher throughput is just another metric. Infrastructure only matters when people actually use it. #LocusChain #Web3 #Layer1 #TPS 📌 Official Link ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
👍8❤2👏1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Bridges get hacked because they centralize trust. Locus Chain is different. ☄️Fully P2P: no central relay to attack. ☄️Dynamic Sharding: traffic is distributed automatically. ☄️Verifiable Pruning: data integrity is preserved. No single point of failure(SPOF) No central point to attack. #LocusChain #Layer1 #Blockchain #SPOF #P2P 📌 Official Link ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
❤5
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Building a fast blockchain is not the goal. It’s unlocking what was once blocked by slow blockchain speeds. The reality Locus Chain is building. #LocusChain #Blockchain #TPS #Speed 📌 Official Link ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
👍6🐳1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣 Locus Chain Testnet V2 Notice Locus Testnet V2 will be rebooted to improve stability and performance. 🕒 Reboot Schedule June 26, 2026, 16:00 PM (KST) As part of this process, all data will be reset, including NFTs and tokens from the previous test phase. Following the network reset, all participants must update their node and wallet, and create a new account to continue testing. Thank you for your un…
👍7
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 📣🚨 $250M+ lost to bridge hacks in 2026. ⚠️ 14+ major incidents. The same root cause, every time. It's not a bug, it's the centralized trust model itself. One bridge. One relay node. 🎯 That’s a Single Point of Failure (SPOF). ‼️ Want to learn more? #Bridge_hack #Web3 #Security #Blockchain 📌 Official Link ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
👍7🐳1
1. 유통량 관련 현재 정확한 유통량은 로커스체인 공식 공지 채널에 공개된 수량을 기준으로 합니다. 👉 https://circulation.locuschain.com/ 주말 중 발생한 재단 리저브 보관 지갑의 변동에 대해서는 가능한 모든 채널을 통해 즉시 공지드렸으며, 고팍스에도 보고를 완료했고, 코인마켓캡에도 데이터 일치를 위한 관련 자료를 제출한 상태입니다. 2. 코인마켓캡 집계 관련 재단의 관리 지갑 주소가 교체되는 경우, 코인마켓캡의 유통량 집계가 실제 수량과 일시적으로 차이를 보이는 사례는 그동안에도 자주 있어 왔습니다. 이는 결코 인위적인 조작이 아님을 다시 한번 분명히 말씀드립니다. 실제로 로커스체인은 지난 2분기에도 홈페이지 공지 기준 유통량(약 38억~39억 개)을 적용하면 분기 평균 시가총액이 500억 원을 넘겼습니…
👍10❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @locusofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOCUS CHAIN Official” (@locusofficial), 19,253 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/locusofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.