로빈후드 대장 밈코인을 못산 마음.. 로빈후드의 깐부인 라이터의 생태계 fuego nft을 사서 달래본다..

Channel
국장이 되고싶은 CCT
@civilescape
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002580809797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @civilescape |
| Description | 코인으로 기득권이 되고싶은 약대생입니다 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/civilescape |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.3%
- avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13.5
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 21.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 162 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 579
- Videos
- 7
- Links
- 249
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
진짜 가네.. 30m부터 사고싶었는데 잘가 ㅜㅜ
😎오늘은 Fuego 민팅을 해볼예정입니다. 체크해보니 PWL이라 괜찮을거같네요. https://x.com/fuegonft/status/2084265766195511430?s=46
간만에 tge상장이라 업, 빗으로 나눠보냈는데 걍 비트겟에서 사팔하는게 정답이었네요. 갭이 30%가량 났었습니다 quid
OKX 구독 $20 캐쉬백 들어왔네요. 공짜로 지피티 쓰는거라 너무 개꿀인데요? ㄷㄷㄷ
👍3
알바트로스님이 강연을 한다고 하네요. 지금부터 1년간 꾸준히 운동한 사람들을 초대한다고 하는데 관심이 가네요. https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/224358119078
99.9%의 밈코인은 가루가 되는구나
오늘은 sol체인 밈코입문을 해봤습니다. $BOP를 샀는데 운이 좋았네요❤️ 근데 가면 안되는곳으로 가는걸까요..?
Long.xyz가 다음 테마가 될 가능성을 높게 보는 이유 개인적으로 Robinhood Chain의 다음 테마는 Long.xyz에서 형성될 가능성이 높다고 생각하고 있습니다. 첫 번째 이유는 Long.xyz가 Robinhood가 지속적으로 강조해 온 방향성과 가장 잘 맞아떨어지는 플랫폼이기 때문 Vlad Tenev는 Robinhood Chain을 RWA에 최적화된 체인으로 만들겠다는 방향을 유지하면서도, 동시에 밈이 만들어내는 거래량과 관심을 긍정적으로 받아들이는 모습을 보여주고 있는상황임. 실제로 그는 Robinhood Chain이 RWA를 위한 최고의 체인을 목표로 하지만, 밈에도 잘 작동한다고 직접 언급함. 결국 Robinhood가 원하는 것은 밈과 RWA 중 하나를 선택하는 것이 아니라, 밈을 통해 유입된 유동성을 주식과 RWA …
NOXA 돌아오는 걸까요? 👀 (https://x.com/NoxaLaunchpad/status/2079751142775324768?s=20)
💰GPT나 Youtube, Claude OKX카드로 결제하면 VIP는 $40, Non VIP는 $20 매달 1일에 rebate준다고 하네요 ㄷㄷ 전 GPT plus 결제했습니다
찬밥신세건 뭐건 드디어탈출 ㅜㅜㅜㅜ
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @civilescape. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“국장이 되고싶은 CCT” (@civilescape), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/civilescape.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.