Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Доктор Сычев

@dr_sychev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,069subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001268704682
TypeChannel
Username@dr_sychev
Description💊 врач-психиатр, психотерапевт 🖌🎸писатель, музыкант 💯% трезвенник 💡основатель @clinic_neformat ❓запись на консультацию здесь: https://clck.ru/3DmEdu Реклама: @Yulia_Guliaeva Включен РКН в перечень персональных страниц: https://clck.ru/3GK5bc
Created20 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_sychev

Growth

49,01149,07249,041.56 August 2026 — 49,011 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,015 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,049 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,059 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,050 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,069 subscribers49,0696 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,002–49,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:1749,069-3
11 Aug 2026, 15:0649,072+22
10 Aug 2026, 14:0149,050-9
8 Aug 2026, 09:5149,059+10
7 Aug 2026, 09:2849,049+34
6 Aug 2026, 07:0049,015+4
6 Aug 2026, 01:5049,011first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 49,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,460
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (16 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total171,580
Reactions total5,819
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,190
Videos
94
Links
1,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,819 reactions across 23 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,75664.5%
🔥77213.3%
👍65411.2%
❤‍🔥1392.39%
🎉1001.72%
👏771.32%
😁681.17%
👎540.928%
🙏440.756%
🤔350.601%
💯310.533%
🤝250.43%
custom 5212937893193990383230.395%
200.344%
🏆70.12%
💔60.103%
💘50.086%
👀20.034%
👌10.017%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,819reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 23 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_sychev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,550 views285 reactions21 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не верится, но моему проекту Neformat — уже 5! 😱 Был бы ребёнком — уже готовился бы к школе, ходил на английский и карате. А он вместо этого разросся до размеров, которые я в 2021-м не рисовал даже в самых наглых мечтах. В самом начале были я и семеро смелых (ребята, привет!), которые поверили в меня и ввязались в нонейм-проект. Он начинался как попытка искренне, от себя, рекомендовать тех, за кого я ручаюсь голово

161🎉89🔥35

11 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈3,690 views251 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Друзья дорогие, я к вам с потрясающей новостью: радуюсь лютейше, горжусь и ликую, ибо первая печатная книга моего Неформатного проекта, которую написала наша прекрасная Зоя Соколова, и в которой я имел честь быть медицинским редактором — «Аутизм у взрослых» (aka «Тяжёлая жизнь с „лёгким“ аутизмом» в электронной версии) — попала в номинацию «Шаг вперёд» медицинской книжной премии «Здравомыслие»🎉 Премия отмечает проек

160🔥61❤‍🔥19🎉11

11 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈4,020 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пустой жёлтый коридор с гудящими лампами. Ни людей, ни выхода, ни смысла — а оторваться невозможно. Разбираемся, что происходит с психикой, когда мы залипаем на лиминальные пространства: почему от них мурашки, зачем мы возвращаемся за этим чувством сами и не значит ли это, что с нами что-то не так Четыре исследования — в карточках 👉 А в комментах расскажите, нравится вам такое или вы не понимаете, что все в них на

106🔥24👍15🤔11

10 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈4,770 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Исследование: не выспался — тело само начинает копить лишнее 🍩 На днях вышло исследование в Annals of Internal Medicine: учёные сравнили показатели 95 взрослых, которым дали сначала нормально поспать, а потом шесть недель подряд урезали им сон всего на полтора часа в сутки. Еду при этом не трогали вообще. И вот что вышло: вес испытуемых в среднем увеличился на 0,45 кг, талия плюсанула на полсантиметра, а уровень го

64🔥21👎9👍7😁2

10 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈5,290 views226 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Можно ли поставить РАС или СДВГ, если пациент и врач из разных языков и культур ВОПРОС: Можно ли адекватно диагностировать РАС и/или СДВГ, если пациент говорит на языке психиатра, но для него этот язык не родной, и пациент вырос в другом социокультурном контексте, чем психиатр? #сычев_отвечает Диагностировать можно, но риск ошибки в такой ситуации реально выше. Начну с корня проблемы. Ни для РАС, ни для СДВГ не с

🔥12176👍29

6 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈7,510 views142 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ребзи, давно не делился с вами классными подборками каналов, которые лично уважаю и горячо советую 🔥 Тут всё по науке и без мракобесия. Еще и с полезными гайдами! Разбираем: Ирина Галеева — невролог и сомнолог. Здесь про лечение головных болей, болей в спине и бессонницы. А еще много полезного для людей с СДВГ! Если у вас болит голова, можно пройти короткий тест на тип головной боли, а еще тест на хронотип, чтобы п

83🔥44👍13👎2

5 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈8,120 views264 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Антидепрессанты и оральные контрацептивы: что сочетается, а что нет ВОПРОС: Какой из антидепрессантов наиболее безопасен для применения совместно с оральными контрацептивами, а какие лучше не использовать? #сычев_отвечает Клинически значимых проблем в этой паре (АД+КОК) немного. Систематический обзор, специально посвящённый сочетанию гормональной контрацепции с психотропными препаратами, нашёл на удивление мало д

👍14489🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈8,110 views371 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Правда ли, что талант может быть связан с психическими расстройствами ВОПРОС: Есть ли корреляция между особенными способностями в творчестве и ментальными проблемами? #сычев_отвечает Корреляция есть, но она гораздо уже и слабее, чем принято думать, а главное — устроена совсем не так, как рисует миф о безумном гении. Самое серьёзное, что по этому поводу сделано, — шведское регистровое исследование почти на 1,2 мил

256🔥61👍42💯10👀2

5 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC≈6,880 views448 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

Неделю приветливый, неделю злой и молчаливый: как это называется ВОПРОС: Как называется, когда человек неделю общительный, приветливый и болтливый, а следующую неделю злой, резкий, молчаливый, раздражённый, хмурый, агрессивный? Без видимых на то причин. На вопросы «случилось ли что», «как дела» отвечает сквозь зубы: «Всё нормально, я же сказал, всё нормально, чё пристала». И через сколько-то дней или неделю внезапно

337👍65🔥35❤‍🔥11

4 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC≈7,540 views587 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Меняют ли антидепрессанты личность: что говорят исследования Оба страха я слышу постоянно. И оба стоят на одной подмене понятий. Подмена такая: «антидепрессанты меняют мозг» → «значит, они его ломают». Но мозг меняет вообще всё, что вы делаете. Изучение языка меняет мозг. Психотерапия меняет мозг — и это, кстати, видно на снимках. Депрессия сама по себе меняет мозг, и вот тут изменения точно не в вашу пользу. «Измен

442🔥81👍45👏13💔6

3 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈6,890 views129 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Салют, дорогие мои! Понедельник пришел как миленький. И я верный традициям объявляю сбор ваших вопросов. Правила старые: спрашивайте что угодно. Единственная просьба: постарайтесь формулировать вопросы покороче. Телеграм неумолим и если ваш вопрос будет размером с «Сильмариллион», то вместе с моим ответом он в пост уже не влезает, а резать ваши вопросы рука не поднимается. Если в голове сразу несколько тем — лучше

90❤‍🔥24👍13🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈7,570 views218 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

У моей группы «ГОЛОВА АПОСТОЛА» на днях вышел альбом. Я писал и релизил его 2 года. В итоге очень доволен работой. Все получилось прямо так как надо. Спасибо: Тимофею Кирину за аранжировки и сведение, а так же за смирение по поводу правок и любовь к моему материалу Саше Седину за веру в мои стихи и живой звук Кириллу Калинину за энергию и любовь к музыке Моей жене и детям за терпение к моему ору в микрофон в сос

122❤‍🔥42🔥40👍10👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @dr_sychev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,133 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Людмила Петрановская
@lpetranovskaya · 169,408
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Сычев” (@dr_sychev), 49,069 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_sychev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.