Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MarysStories

Channel

MarysStories

@Marys_stories

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,721subscribers

-80 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001520648394
TypeChannel
Username@Marys_stories
DescriptionТелеграмм канал нутрициолога Марии Кардаковой РКН № 6051068807 🍔Жизнь писателя и ученого по науке с удовольствием 🥗Рецепты Курсы, книги, приложение: https://mariakardakova.taplink.ws/
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Marys_stories

Growth

31,72131,80131,7616 August 2026 — 31,801 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,783 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,779 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,773 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,769 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,766 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,751 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,732 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,721 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,709–31,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:1731,721-11
13 Aug 2026, 11:1631,732-19
12 Aug 2026, 10:3331,751-15
11 Aug 2026, 12:2731,766-3
10 Aug 2026, 15:5431,769-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:2131,773-6
8 Aug 2026, 19:5531,779-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:5731,783-11
6 Aug 2026, 14:4831,794-7
6 Aug 2026, 06:1731,801first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.29%
avg views ÷ 31,721 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,950
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held23 (1 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total67,780
Reactions total1,576
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,270
Videos
1,120
Links
952

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,530 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,10172.0%
🔥27618.0%
😱513.33%
👍442.88%
🤯342.22%
🤔110.719%
👏70.458%
💯30.196%
🥰30.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,576reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Marys_stories. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,400 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Профессия нутрициолог 2026: зарплата, ИИ и новые законы Опубликовала большое видео на YouTube про то, как стать нутрициологом в 2026 году и почему эта профессия за последний год изменилась сильнее, чем за всю историю. Записали его месте с моей коллегой Дарьей Маркиной - медицинским юристом и специалистом общественного здравоохранения. В видео все, что надо знать до входа в профессию: – Где реально работают нутрици

8🥰3🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,170 views10 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Фух. Интервью мракобесное разобрали 👆🏼 теперь к насущным делам 👇🏼 У нас в открыта вакансия Backend-разработчика в тех команду приложения! Требования комплексные. Если это не вы, передайте друзьям, кто мог бы вписаться в перспективный проект в классной команде! Можно совмещать, но есть NDA. *фото с работы для привлечения внимания

10

14 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,120 views83 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @nutritionclinic_ru

«Иммунодиетология» и IgG-тесты помогают подобрать персональное питание» В интервью утверждается, что тесты на антитела класса IgG позволяют выявить пищевую непереносимость и персонализировать рацион. Однако тестирование на IgG (в том числе IgG4) не имеет диагностической ценности для выявления аллергии на продукты. Потому что выработка IgG к пищевым белкам — это признак того, что иммунная система знакома с продуктом

🔥5132

14 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC≈2,000 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @nutritionclinic_ruPhoto

Научный(?) подход к питанию Рубрика «Разбор интервью» возвращается по вашим заявкам. Посмотрели видео «Дефицит калорий – это глупость»: научный подход к питанию от иммунодиетолога Марины Розенштейн» и решили разобрать несколько тезисов, которые вызвали вопросы с точки зрения доказательной медицины и науки. 🧐 Дежурила по разбору сегодня нутрициолог Nutririon Clinic и биолог Екатерина Савина. Что объединяет почти вс

8👍4

14 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,920 views25 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Как мне нравится, когда бывшие ученики становятся коллегами! Екатерина - выпускница 2 потока моей головой программы по нутрициологии. Доказательных специалистов должно быть в публичном поле больше! Кто-то же должен противостоять мракобесам с их авторскими методиками и антинаучными утверждениями

25

13 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈2,280 views40 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

40

13 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈2,310 views57 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍3221💯3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈2,550 views85 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

71🔥13👍1

12 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈2,930 views133 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Posted without readable text

88🤯34🤔11

11 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,260 views45 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @rospotrebnadzor_ruPhoto

Роспотребнадзор принимает меры в связи с появившейся в СМИ информацией о реализации на маркетплейсах препаратов для похудения, содержащих сибутрамин В связи с появившейся в СМИ информацией о том, что на маркетплейсах реализуются препараты для похудения под торговыми марками Supressa, Ultra Lipo 3, Mineral Balance, S Figura Slim, содержащие сибутрамин, Роспотребнадзор сообщает, что данные препараты отсутствуют в Един

42👍3

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈4,550 views42 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Что меняется для нутрициологов с 1 сентября? В России вступит в силу приказ Минздрава с обновленным перечнем медицинских и фармацевтических специальностей - теперь нутрициологов тоже в него включат. Понимаю, что волнует коллег и тех, кто еще только думает войти в профессию: ❓ Есть ли смысл без мед образования учиться на нутрициолога? ❓ Как теперь работать самозанятым и ИП? ❓ Что нужно для официальной работы нутриц

33🔥5👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Marys_stories. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 99,434 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Комиссарова ☀️
@doctor_komissarova · 98,017
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
ImmunoBee
@immunobee1 · 104,466
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Шелуша Фуд | @shelusha_food | Маша Шелушенко
@shelusha_food · 327,984
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Людмила Петрановская
@lpetranovskaya · 169,317
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Максим Кузнецов - Врач эндокринолог
@medic_smith · 146,965
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Лариса Суркова - larangsovet
@larangsovetme · 117,340
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Заметки детского врача
@DrButriy · 138,269
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MarysStories” (@Marys_stories), 31,721 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marys_stories.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.