Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 52 days, net -2,964. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136,144–139,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:16
136,589
-344
19 Sept 2026, 09:40
136,933
-142
16 Sept 2026, 21:59
137,075
-89
14 Sept 2026, 21:22
137,164
-114
13 Sept 2026, 10:57
137,278
-132
11 Sept 2026, 11:36
137,410
-218
8 Sept 2026, 20:38
137,628
-283
5 Sept 2026, 13:59
137,911
-175
3 Sept 2026, 12:21
138,086
-85
2 Sept 2026, 07:33
138,171
-62
1 Sept 2026, 05:48
138,233
-86
31 Aug 2026, 04:16
138,319
-49
30 Aug 2026, 05:16
138,368
-45
29 Aug 2026, 03:13
138,413
-47
28 Aug 2026, 04:53
138,460
-95
27 Aug 2026, 06:02
138,555
-61
26 Aug 2026, 02:28
138,616
-67
25 Aug 2026, 00:36
138,683
-146
23 Aug 2026, 13:48
138,829
-38
21 Aug 2026, 23:45
138,867
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 136,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
54 (15 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
929,200
Reactions total
36,482
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,050
Videos
≈233
Links
≈565
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 58m
Average length
5m 40s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
85,570 reactions across 54 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42,806
50.0%
👍
11,372
13.3%
🕊
10,949
12.8%
💯
4,206
4.92%
🤬
3,861
4.51%
🤣
2,977
3.48%
🔥
2,710
3.17%
😢
2,298
2.69%
😁
1,202
1.40%
💔
1,090
1.27%
🤷♂
782
0.914%
🙏
586
0.685%
👏
298
0.348%
😱
242
0.283%
👌
80
0.093%
⚡
76
0.089%
😍
35
0.041%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85,570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
844
across the posts below
Posts paid on
53
of 54 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
138
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yashin_russia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С налогами уже обманули
9 сентября, незадолго до выборов, Песков утверждал, что о повышении налогов речи не идёт.
Через четыре дня после голосования Минфин предложил новые налоги и сборы, которые могут принести бюджету около 1,1 трлн рублей.
Перед выборами власти также обещали, что мобилизации не будет. Будет, как с налогами?
У нас тут интересное мероприятие намечается в Берлине.
«Мирная Россия» организует открытую встречу с членом бюро партии Владимиром Ашурковым. Он расскажет, почему решил заняться публичной политикой, поделится мнением о положении дел в России и мире, а также будет отвечать на ваши вопросы.
Если вы в Берлине или где-то поблизости, приходите.
Для участия во встрече надо зарегистрироваться по ссылке: https://www.event…
Кремль перестарался с очередными выборами военного времени.
18+ / НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ КОМИНЫМ МИХАИЛОМ ОЛЕГОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА КОМИНА МИХАИЛА ОЛЕГОВИЧА.
В 2024 году Путин получил результат, свойственный больше латиноамериканским / среднеазиатским диктатурам (87% при 77% явке), чем самому же себе предыдущи…
«Единая Россия» проиграла выборы в большинстве центров антивоенной эмиграции
Партия «Единая Россия» не заняла первое место на большинстве зарубежных участков в городах, которые после начала полномасштабной войны стали крупными центрами российской эмиграции. К такому выводу пришло «Агентство», проанализировав данные ЦИК о результатах голосования на 27 зарубежных участках.
На 18 из 27 участков победила партия «Новые …
Проголосовал в консульстве РФ в Нью-Йорке. Изображающие дипломатов сотрудники ФСБ на входе с интересом меня изучали и кому-то звонили. Но бюллетень выдали, и обошлось без эксцессов.
После голосования поучаствовал вместе с ребятами из нашей партии «Мирная Россия» в протестном митинге под окнами консульства. Сказал в мегафон, что демократия и свобода России — это работа российских граждан, а защита Украины от Путина —…
«Полдень за мирную Россию» в Берлине
У посольства России сегодня собрались участники акции. Здесь проходит митинг, выставка «Лица российского сопротивления» и символический избирательный участок.
Будем показывать, как проходит «Полдень» по всему миру. Присылайте свои фото и видео в @noon_mr_bot.
«Полдень за мирную Россию» в Москве
Собрали фотографии с разных участков города. Среди них — УИК №3238 в Зеленограде и УИК №777. Не у всех присланных фотографий указан номер участка.
Присылайте фото и видео в @noon_mr_bot — пожалуйста, указывайте район или номер УИК.
Так, друзья. У меня неприятные новости.
Нахожусь сейчас в США; выступал здесь на «Вашингтонском диалоге». План был лететь отсюда в Ереван, где я собирался участвовать в «Полудне за мирную Россию» и провести встречу с антивоенным сообществом.
Однако пока я был в Вашингтоне, меня предупредили о неких рисках, связанных с моей поездкой в Армению. Деталей раскрывать не могу, но речь идёт о физической угрозе.
К сожалени…
«Я война. Помоги мне убивать», — говорит актер Никита Кукушкин. Это ролик в поддержку акции «Полдень за мирную Россию»
Актер Никита Кукушкин, осудивший вторжение России в Украину и уехавший за границу, записал ролик в поддержку акции «Полдень за мирную Россию». Ее продвигают Илья Яшин и некоторые другие российские оппозиционеры в изгнании. Они предлагают россиянам прийти на избирательные участки в полдень 20 сентябр…
«Я война. Помоги мне убивать»
Почти пять лет Путин и его армия ведут войну против Украины. И всё это время миллионы россиян не могут открыто высказать свою антивоенную позицию.
Но молчание не должно означать согласие. Люди, которые хотят мира, должны увидеть друг друга и сделать свою позицию видимой.
Актёр Никита Кукушкин — о том, что происходит, когда мы стараемся жить так, будто войны нет.
20 сентября в 12:00 п…
65 миллиардов рублей в день — столько Путин тратит на войну из российского бюджета
За четыре с половиной года эти деньги могли бы пойти на тысячи новых школ, современные больницы, дороги и развитие российских городов.
Вместо этого — война, разрушения и всё новые расходы из бюджета.
20 сентября в 12:00 приходите на избирательные участки. Голосуйте против «Единой России».
Полдень за мирную Россию.
«Нет, Владимир Путин, Господу не угодна война, которую вы ведёте против Украины».
Священник Николай Платонов отвечает на попытки оправдать войну волей Божьей: нельзя прикрывать убийства, разрушения и человеческую боль именем Христа.
До 20 сентября — пять дней.
20 сентября в 12:00 приходите на избирательные участки. Голосуйте против «Единой России».
Полдень за мирную Россию.
❤1,060🕊366💯138👍56🤣36😢13🙏5💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @yashin_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПЕВЧИХ @mariapevchikh · 22,843 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Закат Империи • Время и деньги • Андрей Аксёнов @zakat_podcast · 31,069 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Милов. Команда @team_milov · 31,500 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
ШЕПЕЛИН @ilyashepelin · 45,555 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Колезев ☮️ @kolezev · 59,829 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Дудь @yurydud · 862,341 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026
Жданов @ioannZH · 20,646 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Вадим Савицкий [Когнитивный надзор] @cognitivniynadzor · 25,025 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
Vsya takaya Mongayt @vsyatakayamongayt · 33,011 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
Популярная политика @politica_media · 37,506 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Таня Ф. @tanya_f · 21,172 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Движение «Весна» 💚 @vesna_democrat · 34,964 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Продолжение следует @prosleduet_media · 46,952 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
Faridaily @faridaily24 · 63,127 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Проверено.Медиа @provereno_media · 34,200 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
KALOY.RU @akaloy · 53,269 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Холод @holodmedia · 58,374 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
ВладимирОсечкин: ГУЛАГу - НЕТ!🕊️ @NetGulagu · 114,333 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
ОВД-Инфо @ovdinfo · 121,909 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Максим Кац @maximkatz · 161,200 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Котрикадзе иностранных дел @k_kotrikadze · 21,843 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Better Call Tatyana @USimmigrationlawyer · 27,429 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
Дмитрий Львович Быков @dmibykov · 40,349 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Вёрстка @svobodnieslova · 113,249 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 372 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Мирная Россия(ru.wikipedia.org) “…== Примечания ==
{{примечания}}
== Ссылки ==
* [https://t.me/yashin_russia Официальный Telegram-канал Ильи Яшина]
[[Категория:Политические…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья Яшин” (@yashin_russia), 136,589 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yashin_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.