Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Доктор Травкин

@drtravkin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,098subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453914723
TypeChannel
Username@drtravkin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drtravkin

Growth

10,09810,10810,1036 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,106 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,104 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,105 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 8 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,097–10,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:1610,098-4
13 Aug 2026, 08:2410,102-3
12 Aug 2026, 06:0310,105+1
11 Aug 2026, 08:0210,104-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:4710,106-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:5610,107-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:0310,108first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 10,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total14,930
Reactions total811
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,328 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,52565.5%
👍54723.5%
🔥1707.30%
🙏351.50%
💯281.20%
😢230.988%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 22 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drtravkin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC740 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Кветиапин Кветиапин — один из самых известных и одновременно самых неоднозначно воспринимаемых препаратов в психиатрии. В зависимости от дозы он может давать совершенно разные клинические эффекты и применяется при разных психических расстройствах. В новом посте разбираю: — как работает кветиапин; — почему эффект зависит от дозы; — при каких расстройствах его используют; — какие побочные эффекты встречаются; — что

33👍12

10 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,250 views94 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ОКР и ОКРЛ: в чем сходство и отличия? В психиатрии есть два диагноза, которые звучат очень похоже и даже внешне могут выглядеть одинаково, но по структуре сильно отличаются. Это обсессивно-компульсивное расстройство — ОКР — и обсессивно-компульсивное расстройство личности — ОКРЛ. И там, и там можно увидеть перфекционизм, стремление к контролю, повышенное внимание к деталям и определенную ригидность, упрямство. Но п

66🔥17👍10💯1

31 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,110 views102 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Венлафаксин: разбор препарата Венлафаксин — один из самых эффективных антидепрессантов при тревоге и депрессии. Но вокруг него много мифов: что он «слишком тяжелый», вызывает сильную зависимость или подходит только в крайних случаях. В этом посте разберем: • когда венлафаксин действительно помогает; • чем он отличается от других антидепрессантов; • какие побочные эффекты встречаются чаще всего; • почему его важно п

69👍33

29 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈2,210 views93 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Деперсонализация и дереализация: симптомы, диагностика и лечение Довольно сложное для описания, но очень часто встречающееся состояние в психиатрии Деперсонализация — устойчивое чувство отстранённости от себя: тела, мыслей, эмоций. Пациенты говорят, что «как будто наблюдаю за собой со стороны». Дереализация — ощущение нереальности окружающего мира: люди и предметы кажутся туманными, «ненастоящими», как во сне. Эт

67👍23🔥3

23 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC≈2,870 views183 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Депрессивный тип личности Представьте себе вечно недовольного человека. Не важно, что происходит — на его лице крайне редко бывает улыбка. Случаются периоды, когда кажется, что он изменился, но длятся в лучшем случае они не больше пары месяцев. А потом он снова начинает жаловаться на все подряд. Он часто бывает раздражен, ему все время не хватает энергии, мотивации, сил. Те, кто помнят его с ранних лет, говорят, ч

129👍38🔥14💯2

21 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC≈2,730 views197 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сначала маску на себя, потом на ребенка Я уверен, что подавляющее большинство психотерапевтов хотя бы раз говорили своим клиентам эту фразу. Потому что она действительно очень точная, и в ней заложено гораздо больше смысла, чем кажется на первый взгляд. Все, кто хоть раз летал на самолете, слышали ее перед взлетом. И очень часто мы переносим этот принцип на жизнь. Обычно его понимают так: прежде чем заботиться о др

144🔥32👍13🙏5😢2💯1

17 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC≈3,020 views97 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Выдергивание волос и психиатрия Трихотилломания — это психическое расстройство, при котором человек испытывает трудно контролируемое желание выдергивать собственные волосы. Чаще всего страдают волосы на голове, но могут выдергиваться ресницы, брови или волосы на других участках тела. Трихотилломания может быть симптомом такого расстройства, как BFRB (Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors) — это повторяющееся поведение,

👍5827😢12

9 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈3,420 views133 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Панические атаки на работе Когда-то давно ко мне обратилась пациентка с паническими атаками, которые случались на работе. Мы хорошо продвинулись. Приступы практически исчезли, она перестала бояться, что умрет от остановки сердца прямо на глазах у коллег. За время терапии мы успели обсудить многое: отношения с коллективом, рабочие границы, планирование времени, жизненные цели. И вдруг однажды она приходит на прием

👍6554💯11🔥3

8 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,730 views68 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как подобрать антидепрессант с первого раза? Сегодня психиатрия умеет значительно повысить вероятность удачного выбора антидепрессанта. Один из наиболее полезных принципов — симптомоцентричный подход. Читайте по ссылке в новом посте что это такое, как работает на практике и как лично я его использую данный концепт. https://teletype.in/@dr.travkin/21f_AYIN2DH

39👍13💯11🔥5

7 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,680 views94 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Циталопрам vs Эсциталопрам Немногие знают, но есть один антидепрессант, который сегодня назначают все реже. И он относится к группе современных антидепрессантов. Это циталопрам. В каком-то смысле циталопрам — старший брат эсциталопрама (другой современный антидепрессант больше известный как ципралекс, элицея или селектра). Без циталопрама не было бы и эсциталопрама. Но сегодня именно эсциталопрам стал одним из са

79👍15

6 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC≈3,090 views122 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Можно ли умереть от панической атаки? Во время панической атаки умереть невозможно. Паническая атака — это не смерть. Это страх смерти. В этот момент организм ошибочно думает, что вам угрожает опасность, и запускает древнюю реакцию «бей или беги». За это отвечает миндалевидное тело — центр тревоги и страха в мозге. У некоторых людей оно начинает воспринимать абсолютно безопасные сигналы как угрозу для жизни. Из-за

82👍25🙏9🔥6

2 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC≈3,190 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сегодня необычный пост. Моя пациентка Маргарита, с которой мы давно работаем, попросила рассказать о её блоге. https://t.me/zhiznsbas Уже полтора года они вместе с мужем ведут его, рассказывая о своей жизни после того, как столкнулись с диагнозом боковой амиотрофический склероз (БАС). Это дневник о том, как они справляются с болезнью, с какими трудностями сталкиваются и как продолжают жить дальше. Лечение требует

56🙏15😢7

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @drtravkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 303,339 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Максим Кузнецов - Врач эндокринолог
@medic_smith · 146,889
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 137,470
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Травкин” (@drtravkin), 10,098 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drtravkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.