по вопросам рекламы @juliastk
по вопросам иллюстраций anyaconservi@gmail.com
по вопросам дать мне денег https://boosty.to/conservi
🫘🍅🫘🍅🫘
включена в реестр РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6736eb8805391b3bfb57ce26®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,703–39,822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:45
39,808
+8
12 Aug 2026, 05:52
39,800
+22
11 Aug 2026, 04:03
39,778
+43
10 Aug 2026, 06:11
39,735
+18
9 Aug 2026, 07:13
39,717
-20
8 Aug 2026, 10:08
39,737
+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:53
39,734
-14
6 Aug 2026, 13:00
39,748
+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:45
39,747
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:37
39,747
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 39,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,200
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
54 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
874,480
Reactions total
61,535
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,810
Videos
≈145
Links
≈259
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
49,425 reactions across 44 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
27,088
54.8%
custom 6051049629422719319
5,586
11.3%
🔥
2,841
5.75%
💋
2,552
5.16%
🍓
2,228
4.51%
🤯
2,125
4.30%
💯
1,997
4.04%
💅
1,950
3.95%
😭
1,867
3.78%
🕊
983
1.99%
🤝
208
0.421%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,535reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 54 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fasolicus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я вам по секрету скажу что страдаю по ночам особенно осенью! У меня очень мерзнут ноги и я никогда не усну пока не согреюсь. Иногда согревание занимает часы, даже в штанах под пуховым одеялом мне может быть очень долго холодно. Чтобы не страдать и облегчить засыпание я купила электропростынь с подогревом. Теперь я просто нагреваю свою жопу перед сном 😁😁😁 да я стара и грею кости но посмотрим кто из нас прав когда стан…
Меня спросили про жениха моей мечты. Так как в жизни я таких не встречала давайте на персонажах.
Конечно мне нравятся красавчики типа тома круза в молодости но если просто посадить меня с ним в одной комнате он мне не понравится.
Мне нравятся сильные но мягкие персонажи без токсичной маскулинности. Вот новый краш всего голливуда том холланд не относится к себе слишком серьезно, танцует в колготочках, любит жену, добр…
Вы знаете вот правду говорят. Я никогда не считала себя такой хорошенькой как в 33. У меня никогда не было такого красивого тела, волос, гардероба, косметики. Я так боялась этих 30, мне казалось что в американских сериалах все врут. Но это правда! Мужчины правда после 30 в основном без комментариев но это детали, там уже другое ищешь
Доброе утро мне на тренировку через 5 часов. Сна почему-то нет. Сильный зуд от аллергии прошел теперь просто больно трогать, неприятно, пузырики от аллергии подсохли.
Сыграем в игру «найди 400 отличий»? Спорим не угадаете где до а где после? Справедливости ради, 15 лет прошло
Я продолжаю искать идеальные ресницы. В корее мне гига понравились tok tok и формой и качеством клея. Они еще дешевые были. У нас есть дешевые китайские на маркетплейсах с красивой формой как на фото, но клей плоховат, видно что края почти сразу отходят.
Клей очень классный у nagaraku но они дорогие и они очень неестественные просто длиннющие ресницы скорее для косплея чем на каждый день. Продолжаю собирать информаци…
Друзья, протеин со вкусом твикса плохо пошел. Приготовьтесь пожалуйста, соберите сумки с самым необходимым и в случае чего убедитесь что между вами и улицей две монолитные стены. Стены из пеноблоков или кирпича не годятся. Еще раз извините
Я обожаю готовить как mother!
Никакого масла, 5 минут все пошвырять и получился сухой суп 🥴 но это вкусно! а главное это повод положить немного ненавистного шпината и эдамаме чтобы увеличить клетчатку. Ну и физически на 1000 ккал ты такого не сожрешь 😁 в этом собственно и весь прикол
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @fasolicus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 129,679 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“фасоликус томатикус” (@fasolicus), 39,808 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fasolicus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
