Попала на «Чайку» театрального объединения «Озера», крайне довольна. К моему стыду, мои театральные познания весьма средни, поэтому комментарии тоже любительские. Мне очень понравилось. Все темы Чехова раскрыты актуально, но без излишней каламбурщины. Алина Доценко чарующая и приковывающая, хочу теперь ходить на все ее спектакли. Паулина всегда в моем сердце и уме, действительно муза. Петуха мне вручили за добрые г…

Channel
не тереби дао
@dukaliti
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
123,382subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001096873512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dukaliti |
| Description | Амбассадор немалого бизнеса Альфа-Банка. Канал Ксении Дукалис. Подмечаю, как мы летим в никуда, и вещаю про книги, кино, материнство, культуру и предпринимательство. Лимонады «Река» — это я😇 Kdukalis.booking@gmail.com Регистрация https://rknn.link/dgo |
| Created | 17 November 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dukaliti |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 123,382 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 123,383 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 123,378 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 123,382 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 123,381 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 123,387 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 123,396 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 123,400 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 123,400 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.1%
- avg views ÷ 123,382 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 26,000
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.87%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 494,201 |
| Reactions total | 24,087 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,220
- Videos
- ≈588
- Links
- ≈1,330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,309 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,784 | 58.5% | |
| custom 5269373218002580201 | 2,307 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5453901746231325622 | 944 | 7.09% | |
| custom 5418248539807455434 | 559 | 4.20% | |
| 💯 | 452 | 3.40% | |
| custom 5269478706694343963 | 374 | 2.81% | |
| custom 5418228383525936942 | 276 | 2.07% | |
| 🔥 | 216 | 1.62% | |
| custom 5226507979804658735 | 196 | 1.47% | |
| custom 5283231140436523985 | 98 | 0.736% | |
| custom 5422383077190025308 | 62 | 0.466% | |
| ⚡ | 41 | 0.308% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,087reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 113
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
- Most on one post
- 102
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dukaliti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Мой пост про сборы на вечеринку в стиле нулевых и раскладушку завирусился в телеграм😅 Раз уж вам нравится хлопать телефоном, вот вам еще новость: с 5 по 20 августа в МТС на Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, Z Fold8 и Z Flip8 дают выгоду 20 000 рублей, кешбэк 10% и рассрочку 0–0–24. Но это еще не все! К покупке добавят год связи и МТС Premium на 12 месяцев. Мне ближе компактный Flip, если что 👀
❤127custom 526947870669434396329custom 526937321800258020120⚡4custom 54182283835259369423
У меня от таких комментариев мышиный писк и истерика. Не нужны мне миллионы, мне нужны мои золотые тысячи таких крутых и глубоких зрителей. Каждый раз, когда в клуб вступают девчонки такого калибра или оставляют комментарии такого рода под моими видео, у меня одномоментно активируются синдром самозванца и эйфория. Фангерлинг по своей же аудитории. #сообщество
❤1,810custom 5453901746231325622467custom 5226507979804658735193custom 526937321800258020142custom 526947870669434396336custom 541822838352593694231custom 528323114043652398521
Новый «без суфлера»! Получилось целых 4 темы, но про Джареда самая горячая. Pretty privilege работает и на мужчин, о чем мы с вами забываем. Более 100 обвинений, шутки внутри индустрии и другие косвенные факторы — вопросы закрадываются. А еще обсуждаю с командой, что будем делать с форматом. Чтобы выходить каждую неделю нам нужна ваша поддержка на условном бусти. Либо придется сократить до 2 в месяц, а 2 других пров…
❤670custom 5418248539807455434129custom 528323114043652398562custom 526937321800258020121custom 541822838352593694218
Наконец начала возвращаться к своему спортивному режиму, который у меня был до родов. Сейчас занимаюсь теннисом и пилатесом на реформере, а сегодня начала силовые. Перед началом занятия был тест на выносливость, силу и координацию. Я прыгала, крутила велосипед, отжималась, делала выпады с палкой — в общем и целом, веселилась. В итоге по всем параметрам, кроме выносливости, результат выше среднего. И я поймала офиген…
❤1,470custom 5453901746231325622411custom 5418228383525936942157custom 526947870669434396344🔥34custom 526937321800258020111custom 528323114043652398511
Одним днем сгоняла в СПб, чтобы провести кофе-рейв для клуба Дукалис, завтра уже сет для Динамо и дела по фестивалю «Наречие». Увиделась с приятелями и поняла, что пока я переживаю, что всех достала рассказами про деятельность, люди вообще не в курсе, что у меня происходит. Понимаю, что звучит нелепо, но это и правда дилемма для меня. С одной стороны я занята проектами и их реализацией, с другой — как будто надо про …
❤692🔥148custom 526947870669434396387custom 545390174623132562237custom 541822838352593694210custom 52693732180025802014custom 52832311404365239854
Мысли про скандал с «Колобком» и почему не надо считать зрителя глупым #кино
❤896custom 5418248539807455434320💯229custom 526937321800258020142⚡23custom 541822838352593694216🔥6custom 52265079798046587351
Если в Pinterest вбить my characters, алгоритм предлагает персонажей с твоим вайбом. Честно говоря, все попало очень четко. Кидайте своих! #юмор
❤1,070💯182custom 5418248539807455434110custom 545390174623132562218🔥12custom 52694787066943439635custom 54182283835259369422
Среди книг, купленных в Оксфорде, было вот это сокровище. Давно меня так ничего не вдохновляло и не злило одновременно. Автор исследует историю охоты на ведьм и как тропы о них живут в нашей культуре до сих пор. Три ключевых архетипа — независимая женщина; женщина, которая не хочет детей; женщина, принимающая старость и не пытающаяся молодиться — что тогда, что сейчас чаще всего оказываются под ударом. Очень понравил…
custom 52693732180025802012,150❤449custom 5269478706694343963135🔥16⚡14custom 54182283835259369429custom 54539017462313256226
Как же я скучаю по Джоан Риверс. Столько в ней было юмора, скорости, искры. Пересматриваю старые записи и интервью и такое двоякое чувство грусти и восторга. https://youtu.be/nmAgBrq6ZFE?si=LrYEXJpcdq3jKkFX
❤238custom 526947870669434396338custom 541822838352593694225custom 54539017462313256225
Спасибо за все ваши отметки 🤍 Мы с удовольствием смотрим на пушистиков и очень радуемся, что они вам так понравились! Маленькое напоминание: приносите меховой чехольчик с собой — за него мы дарим скидку 10% на любой напиток ✨ А если своего пушистика вы еще не забрали, то не переживайте. Мы сделали их много, так что точно хватит всем 🫶 Ждем вас в нашей мягконапиточной (Река)² × Poison Drop 😊 📍 Спиридоньевский переу…
❤362custom 542238307719002530862💯41custom 526937321800258020117custom 54182283835259369425custom 52265079798046587352
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dukaliti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 16,001 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@afterrhours · 411 postBELONG
@belongagency · 1,8661 postЧитай Голод
@chitaigolod · 381 postдержим баланс, девАчки
@divinebalance · 2951 postЛизка Палет 🌈
@elizapalette · 5611 postMango Salmone 🧊
@mangosalmone · 401 postВы одеты как черт
@mensoutfitsss · 1,0311 postМутасов Студио
@mutasovstudio · 1,4521 postWork-blog balance • Настич
@nastiich_hub · 8,9351 postNYC Tsenter
@NYC_Tsenter · 3,9561 postЗа пределами коврика
@outsidethemat · 1431 postСЛОВЕССА
@slovessaa · 1,2051 postПро кино за 4 минуты
@veneraprokino · 1301 post/почтичеловек/
@whatareyouwantbitch · 461 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@meformans · 2312 postsПосле Дедлайна
@afterdline · 1,0111 postDj elllite❤️🔥
@djellllite · 471 postОт корки до икорки 🗿
@korki_ikorki · 3271 postСемейный сон - группа поддержки неспящих родителей
@myfamilysleep · 4,1641 postспонтанный ночной проект
@notesofthefield · 411 postШишКИНО
@shishkino · 42,5511 postSmoky Mountain Hats
@smokymountain_hats · 1041 postТренировки для девушек | body & aesthetic
@workout_for_gals · 3681 postЯ есть свобода 🌻
@ya_est_svoboda · 6221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,513
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@istominakarina · 158,832
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
@KateClappTelegram · 172,403
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 August 2026
@irena_ponaroshku · 284,694
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@GALICH_onok · 289,142
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@usachevruslan · 201,249
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@retrogrademercury · 163,677
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@vrednayamoda · 189,003
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@karinaVIP · 178,218
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
@rogov24 · 192,336
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
@sale_caviar · 193,079
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@helenkornilova · 183,862
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
@ksbchk · 373,766
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@fashion_mur · 210,491
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
@mosptichka · 471,284
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@shelusha_food · 328,288
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@lider · 157,148
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
@careerspace · 160,200
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@daniya_alt · 175,600
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@aidaprodom · 306,896
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
@spletni_tg · 188,787
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
@chillosophy · 149,454
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
@dbeskromny · 155,877
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
@sncmag · 301,837
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“не тереби дао” (@dukaliti), 123,382 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dukaliti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.