Video message, posted without a caption
❤48😍35🔥7❤🔥5

Channel
@mashadoestherapychannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,086subscribers
-86 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209916065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mashadoestherapychannel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mashadoestherapychannel |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 7,086 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 7,081 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 7,089 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 7,109 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 7,130 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 7,137 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 7,142 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 7,145 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 7,151 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 7,157 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 7,155 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 7,161 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 7,171 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 7,172 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,395 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 925 | 66.3% | |
| 🔥 | 139 | 9.96% | |
| ❤🔥 | 130 | 9.32% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 4.73% | |
| 🥰 | 37 | 2.65% | |
| 😍 | 35 | 2.51% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 1.51% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 1.15% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 0.645% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 0.43% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.287% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.287% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.143% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.072% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mashadoestherapychannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤48😍35🔥7❤🔥5
Сложности с отдыхом, расслаблением, занятием чем-то непродуктивным - одни из мишеней работы с гиперконтролем. Вот три принципа, которые мы используем в РО ДБТ, работая с этими трудностями: (1) Выявление и исследование ригидных правил «Время должно использоваться с пользой», «если я могу сделать больше, я должен это сделать», «ничего не делать - значит лениться», «если я остановлюсь, то все рухнет»- за трудностями…
❤46❤🔥10👍5🙏2
«Разрешите себе отдыхать» - совет, который вы, возможно, получали, если вам тяжело отказаться от продуктивности. Это ситуация, когда вы вроде бы лежите на диване и не работаете, но и расслабиться не получается. В голове продолжают крутиться дела, появляется мысль, что время можно использовать лучше, а вместе с ней напряжение или чувство вины. Но если в этот момент просто разрешить себе отдыхать, точно ли это поможет…
❤83👍18🔥7😭6❤🔥1👏1
💬 последние книжные скриншоты
❤63❤🔥22🔥8🤓4
Заметки с конференции по ОКР 📝Доклад про R-OCD ОКР отношений - подтип ОКР, при котором навязчивые сомнения и компульсии сосредоточены вокруг темы отношений. Эти сомнения могут быть направлены либо на сами отношения, либо на партнера. В первом случае человек сомневается в качестве и правильности отношений: достаточно ли сильны его чувства, совместимы ли партнеры, действительно ли это подходящие отношения. Во втором …
❤43❤🔥7🔥7👍5💔3
Маша does therapy pinned a photo
После текста о различии между наблюдением и оцениванием себя, в комментариях возник вопрос о том, как развивать у себя способность занимать позицию наблюдателя? Хочется сразу сказать, что это не какая-то отдельная техника, а скорее навык, который формируется постепенно. Например сам по себе психотерапевтический процесс способствует развитию этого навыка, но эту способность можно развивать и самостоятельно. Вот три…
❤55🔥16👍7❤🔥6
У нас в «Альбатросе» стартует новая группа тренинга навыков RO DBT. Сейчас в ней осталось одно место. Я много лет работаю с людьми с гиперконтролем и вижу, насколько по-разному могут выглядеть связанные с ним трудности. Люди обращаются с хронической депрессией, тревогой, перфекционизмом, расстройствами пищевого поведения, постоянным напряжением, сложностями в отношениях и чувством одиночества. При этом сам гиперко…
❤35🔥8👍2
Заметки с конференции по ОКР 📝 Конференцию открывал симпозиум посвященный современным рекомендациям по лечению ОКР. Одним из его центральных посланий звучало как message of hope - послание надежды: ОКР - это расстройство, которое при правильно подобранном и качественно проведенном лечении можно вывести в стойкую ремиссию. Первая линия лечения по-прежнему ERP - экспозиция с предотвращением реакций, а в зависимости …
❤55👍9🔥5🙏3
Планы на выходные такие - ежегодная международная конференция по ОКР 🤓 В программе более 100 докладов. Уже отметила темы, которые хочу послушать в первую очередь: ОКРЛ, работа со сложными случаями, ОКР отношений, работа с сомнениями и руминациями, обзор последних данных по терапии. Поделюсь потом заметками ✍️
🔥46❤29🥰12✍2
Почему наблюдать за собой полезнее, чем оценивать себя Есть один психологический навык, которому, как мне кажется, действительно стоит учиться - это переходить от постоянной оценки себя к наблюдению за собой. На первый взгляд разница кажется неочевидной. Многие из нас уверены, что хорошо знают себя и постоянно анализируют свои мысли, эмоции и поведение. Однако если внимательно прислушаться к своему внутреннему диало…
❤88🔥24❤🔥11🥰3
Возможно, вы не слишком тревожны. Возможно, ваш мозг просто ищет связь. Мы привыкли рассматривать тревогу в отношениях как индивидуальную особенность: человек слишком чувствителен, слишком тревожен и склонен к чрезмерному анализу. Однако в исследованиях потребности в принадлежности была предложена модель social monitoring system. Согласно этой модели, когда одна из фундаментальных человеческих потребностей - потреб…
❤84❤🔥17🔥8👏4🙏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mashadoestherapychannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маша does therapy” (@mashadoestherapychannel), 7,086 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mashadoestherapychannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.