Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейровечеринка🥳

Channel

Нейровечеринка🥳

@neuroparty2022

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,884subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001867901364
TypeChannel
Username@neuroparty2022
DescriptionМедиавечеринка о мозге и не только. Отвечаем на вопросы, рассказываем полезное, шутим. Сотрудничество, реклама: @neuropartyPR Бот для вопросов: @neuro_party_bot Мы: Наташа @nata_in_the_rye Надя @NadyaSty Запись на консультации: @Neuroparty_Manager
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuroparty2022

Growth

11,86911,89011,879.56 August 2026 — 11,890 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,884 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,880 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,879 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,874 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,872 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,869 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,876 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,887 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,884 subscribers11,8846 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,866–11,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:1311,884-3
16 Aug 2026, 05:2311,887+11
14 Aug 2026, 15:5711,876+7
13 Aug 2026, 06:0511,869-3
12 Aug 2026, 08:0311,872-2
11 Aug 2026, 04:5511,874-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:1111,879-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:5811,880-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:2811,884-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:5011,890first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.50%
avg views ÷ 11,884 subscribers
Avg views / post
654
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held50 (30 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total32,690
Reactions total970
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,350
Videos
317
Links
1,880

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 16s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

890 reactions across 44 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21824.5%
🔥17319.4%
👍17219.3%
😁14216.0%
💯495.51%
👀434.83%
👌121.35%
💘111.24%
🥰101.12%
🍓91.01%
😘91.01%
❤‍🔥70.787%
🤔70.787%
😢50.562%
👏40.449%
🏆30.337%
😍30.337%
😱30.337%
🤷‍♀30.337%
🦄20.225%
5 further kinds50.562%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 970reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC380 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026

⭐️ Уже на следующей неделе мы вновь встречаемся в рамках проекта Антивыгорание на Нейровечеринке! Это открытая группа для всех, кто выгорает, выгорал, выгорел, не хочет выгорать, интересуется темой выгорания. Участие бесплатное, встречи раз в месяц, присоединиться можно с любой встречи. Подробности о проекте тут, а здесь можно найти ответы на часто задаваемые вопросы. Всех желающих ждём в чате. Присоединяйтесь!

3👍2🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC425 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Продолжим разбирать стили, выделенные в рамках нейроотличной теории привязанности. 🌟 Когнитивно-связывающий тип привязанности — это стиль, при котором близость строится не столько через прямой эмоциональный контакт, сколько через общие идеи, интересы и способ думать вместе. Со стороны это иногда выглядит как отстранённость или излишняя рациональность — человек не говорит «я скучаю», зато присылает статью по теме, к

10😘3👍2

17 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC477 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

А вы знали, что нейроразнообразие не отменяет границы? ☝️ Учитывать особенности человека — не значит соглашаться с любым поведением. Сенсорная перегрузка, трудности с переключением, импульсивность или истощаемость могут объяснять, почему человеку сложнее справляться, но не делают его действия автоматически безопасными или приемлемыми для других. 😜 Например, если человек резко отвечает, срывает договорённости или тр

22💯9👍3😇1

16 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC646 views52 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#мемы_neuroparty

😁38❤‍🔥5😢5👍21💘1

15 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC700 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Научная новость недели😳 Учёные составили карту щекотки Исследователи решили проверить, одинаково ли люди из разных культур чувствуют щекотку и почему одни части тела чувствительнее к щекотке, чем другие. В исследовании участвовали 448 человек 18–30 лет из Китая, Нидерландов и Греции: они отвечали на вопросы о щекотке и отмечали наиболее чувствительные к щекотке места на силуэтах тела. Там же участники обозначали зо

21👍3🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC737 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👀7🤔3🤷‍♀3

14 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC774 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Жалобы: взрослый человек, 29 лет. Говорит, что всю жизнь был рассеянным, всё откладывает до последнего, постоянно теряет вещи, забывает о договорённостях, перескакивает между задачами и с трудом доводит начатое до конца. На работе срывает сроки, в быту не справляется с рутиной, из-за этого всё чаще злится на себя и думает, что он просто ленивый и несобранный. В последнее время стал замечать, что это не отдельные п

7👍4🔥3🍓1💔1

14 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC666 views19 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте! С вами #пятничныенастолки. Сегодня я бы хотел вам рассказать о чудесной игре «Летний дождь». Её я получил перед поездкой в отпуск на природу, где она оказалась очень кстати в летние дождливые дни, которые я проводил в прекрасном лесу. Игра очень медитативная и рассчитана всё же больше на одного человека, хотя и с сыном получились замечательные партии и обсуждение при выборе самого красивого вида и созд

🔥8👍6🥰31🏆1

13 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC672 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 — Работаю детским психологом. Моя маленькая клиентка недавно спросила меня, кого я больше люблю — её или свою дочку. Я очень растерялась, до сих пор не знаю, как мне стоило отреагировать? #мозголомка

👍7😁5👀4🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC739 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Привет! На связи Надя. Один из подходов, на которые я опираюсь в своей работе, — терапия принятия и ответственности (ACT). Там есть удобная аббревиатура DOTS. Она помогает быстро вспомнить основные способы, с помощью которых мы пытаемся избавиться от неприятных мыслей, чувств и ощущений или избежать этих переживаний. 🔴D — Distraction: отвлечение — сериалы, игры, работа, скроллинг, любые занятия, чтобы переключиться

9👍5❤‍🔥2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @neuroparty2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz279 voters

Какое фото сгенерировано нейросетью?

  1. Первое42%
  2. Второе8%
  3. Оба11%
  4. Ни одно39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,318 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА
@shamilahmadullin · 180,166
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейровечеринка🥳” (@neuroparty2022), 11,884 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuroparty2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.