Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психотерапевт Прибытков

@pribytkov_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,842subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001736149515
TypeChannel
Username@pribytkov_psy
DescriptionПрибытков Алексей Обо мне, консультациях, моей книге 👉 https://taplink.cc/pribytkov Врач-психотерапевт, психиатр кмн, доцент В личку не пишу - это мошенники
Created24 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pribytkov_psy

Growth

39,81039,84239,8266 August 2026 — 39,810 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,810 subscribers7 August 2026 — 39,820 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,823 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,815 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,817 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,822 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,827 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,828 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,842 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,805–39,847 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:5439,842+14
13 Aug 2026, 11:2539,828+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:3739,827+5
11 Aug 2026, 10:4339,822+5
10 Aug 2026, 09:2139,817+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:3339,815-8
8 Aug 2026, 09:4139,823+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:5839,820+10
6 Aug 2026, 10:2139,810no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:1639,810first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 39,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,620
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (22 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total125,090
Reactions total3,645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
778
Videos
13
Links
404

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
1m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,176 reactions across 23 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,49440.4%
😁1,31921.4%
👍1,16818.9%
🔥81413.2%
😱2243.63%
💯741.20%
👏420.68%
🤯280.453%
😭80.13%
👎50.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pribytkov_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC≈4,710 views175 reactionsread 15 August 2026

«Неправильная депрессия» – это биполярное расстройство? ✅ Ответ: особенности депрессии и реакция на лечение помогут заподозрить биполярное расстройство (БР). Но нет такого признака депрессии, который бы однозначно позволил диагностировать БР ❓Почему возникает такой вопрос? Депрессия может быть рекуррентной (повторяющиеся эпизоды депрессии) и может быть частью биполярного расстройства. В случае биполярного расстройс

109👍48🔥17😭1

9 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈5,790 views157 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Одержимость? Вот такой вопрос прилетел. Я даже сходу ответил, что это "вне медицины" но потом засомневался и днями увидел текст по теме Если честно, то у меня таких пациентов не было, хотя на видео приходилось наблюдать (женщина говорит "мужским голосом", считает, что "одержима тёмной сущностью) Но отсутствие в моей практике не говорит, что феномен не существует вообще Существует и даже имеет свой код в МКБ-11: 6

🔥8347👍22😁3😱2

8 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈6,690 views298 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вот такая борьба с социальной тревогой 🙃 А запись про социальное тревожное расстройство (прежнее название - социальная фобия) по ссылке: https://pribytkov.pro/str

😁236🔥31👍1910💯1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈8,540 views188 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Зверобой - это антидепрессант? Он эффективен и безопасен? Спойлер: нет. Подробнее на видео ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Психотерапевт Прибытков: 3️⃣Telegram | 🤟MAX | 4️⃣ВК ㅤ

97👍61🔥27👎2😁1

4 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈9,010 views276 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⬆️⬆️ 🔆 История выше была давностью чуть больше года назад. Сначала я убрал всю ту "горсть таблеток", что назначена ранее. Первым этапом всё же предложил сертралин (золофт) в максимальной дозе (200 мг), но улучшения не было 😥 🔆 Затем рекомендовал переход на венлафаксин 225 мг/сут. Можно было начинать с него, пожалуй, это более обоснованная тактика, но и СИОЗС в максимальной дозе допустимы. 🔆 После этого пациентка..

🔥13989👍48

3 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC≈8,640 views310 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как вам такое лечение? ✍️ Уточню: это назначения из частной московской клиники. Диагноз этой клиники: генерализованное тревожное расстройство; социальное тревожное расстройство; дистимия 🔆 С диагнозом относительно неплохо, но есть одно большое "НО". Дело в том, что помимо всего перечисленного есть ещё и тяжелый депрессивный эпизод, столь выраженный, что затруднены самые обычные действия (убраться в квартире, сходит

😱20259👍28🔥15🤯6

1 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈8,710 views381 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

То ли котики, то ли иллюстрация генетической изменчивости 😊

217😁127🔥36🤯1

30 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈11,900 views91 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🎓Семинары в записи Коллеги, доступны семинары в записи. Узнать подробности и присоединиться можно кликнув по названию семинара (это активная ссылка) 🔆 Биполярное расстройство Как диагностировать и отличить от других нарушений. Как подобрать терапию и почему антидепрессанты - не препарат выбора при биполярной депрессии. Разбор трёх (!) "живых" клинических случаев с разными проявлениями биполярного расстройства. 🔆 Д

52👍26🔥10👏2🤯1

29 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC≈11,400 views203 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Препарат ушёл из крови 🔆 Периодически задают вопрос: как скоро после отмены препарат полностью уйдёт из крови? 🔆 Считается, что это произойдёт через 5-7 периодов полувыведения. Период полувыведения можно найти в инструкции, он показывает за какое время концентрация препарата снижается вдвое (на 50%). Период полувыведения умножаем на 5-7 и получаем искомый срок полного выведения из крови 🔆 Например, для эсциталопра

127👍60🔥15🤯1

26 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈12,100 views586 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Газлайтинг? 🤔 Не, не слышал 🙃

😁473🔥7029👍8😭5🤯1

24 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC≈14,000 views357 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сложный случай 🔆 Пациентка с проявлениями депрессии и генерализованного тревожного расстройства. Симптомы весьма стойкие, присутствуют около 5 лет. Плюс расстройство пищевого поведения (приступообразное переедание) и мигрень. 🔆 Исходно был назначен сертралин (золофт). Это разумный шаг, препарат эффективен при депрессии и ГТР. Но случилось значительное нарастание симптомов мигрени, и вскоре терапия отменена. 🔆 След

222👍86🔥45👎2🤯1😁1

22 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈10,700 views97 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Случайно закрыл комментарии к предыдущей записи 🫤 Если есть желание, можно высказаться здесь ⬇️⬇️

67😁22💯6👎1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @pribytkov_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 24,946 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Отоневролог Оверченко Кира Владимировна dr.kira_ok
@drkiraok · 11,241
9 posts
PsyDocMed
@psydocmed · 9,725
7 posts
PSYdusha
@psydushnila · 119
5 posts
Полина, не сходи с ума | врач-психиатр
@docburlakova · 192
2 posts
𝐋𝐨𝐯𝐞 & 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡
@lovementalhealth · 356
2 posts
Конференция PsyDocMed
@psydocmed_confa · 3,421
2 posts
PsyInf
@psyinf · 43
2 posts
Невролог Романов. Агрегатор чужих и своих страданий.
@romanov_nevrolog · 4,239
2 posts
спектральный аут-сюр
@autsurespectrumclusters · 439
1 post
Страха.нет
@bolshe_ne_boisya · 1,504
1 post
Сексолог Лукашевич
@doc_lukashevich · 1,182
1 post
В дороге
@DocDorozhkin · 283
1 post
эндокринология с @azalino_uho
@endokringe · 248
1 post
Ты не одна
@helpmeAlis · 78
1 post
Лапша с ушей
@mariyaussenova · 199
1 post
Мама Добрая
@mmdobraya · 164
1 post
Разрешаю ошибаться. (Психотерапия/психиатрия)
@n_zhukkova · 1,198
1 post
Neurology/Cardiology/Psychiatry
@neurology_cardiology_psychiatry1 · 364
1 post
Пушистая психология
@psycho_inf · 112
1 post
Психоточка 🧶 Марина Нега
@psychotochka · 44
1 post
Сапронова Анна. Терапия тревожных расстройств.
@psysapronovaan · 49
1 post
МПЦ Решение - инфоканал
@r_psy · 1,932
1 post
НАЧАЛО
@v_nachalo · 98
1 post
Vrachzaraza
@zaraznyivrach · 3,598
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Заметки детского врача
@DrButriy · 138,282
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 137,470
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Максим Кузнецов - Врач эндокринолог
@medic_smith · 146,889
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психотерапевт Прибытков” (@pribytkov_psy), 39,842 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pribytkov_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.