Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Точка опоры • Good Point

Channel

Точка опоры • Good Point

@good_point_21

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,890subscribers

+566 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531356755
TypeChannel
Username@good_point_21
Created2 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/good_point_21

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3197,8907,604.55 August 2026 — 7,324 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,324 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,319 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,330 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,336 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,332 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,335 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,348 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,355 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,358 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,368 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,373 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,393 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,471 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,878 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,882 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,873 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,859 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,858 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,854 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,846 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,845 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,841 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,823 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,814 subscribers13 November 2026 — 7,890 subscribers5 August 202613 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 100 days, net +566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,233–7,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 16:017,890+76
8 Nov 2026, 18:477,814-9
5 Nov 2026, 16:577,823-18
2 Nov 2026, 07:067,841-4
27 Oct 2026, 02:477,845-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:567,846-8
21 Oct 2026, 01:007,854-4
17 Oct 2026, 13:387,858-1
14 Oct 2026, 21:197,859-14
11 Oct 2026, 05:217,873-9
4 Oct 2026, 21:207,882+4
25 Sept 2026, 17:377,878+407
15 Sept 2026, 15:217,471+78
11 Sept 2026, 17:007,393+20
7 Sept 2026, 12:187,373+5
2 Sept 2026, 16:067,368+10
30 Aug 2026, 13:137,358+3
27 Aug 2026, 20:567,355+7
25 Aug 2026, 00:287,348+13
21 Aug 2026, 13:587,335first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 7,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held41 (14 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total19,205
Reactions total579
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,442 reactions across 40 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤97967.9%
🔥22615.7%
❤‍🔥20914.5%
🕊231.60%
🥰30.208%
😢20.139%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,475 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC906 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Секс вне отношений. Как я училась получать удовольствие, а не подтверждать свою ценность своей историей делится коуч, продюсер Good Point Настя Шипилова Последний год я без отношений. Но отношения заканчиваются, а сексуальность никуда не девается. С сексом у меня долго было сложно. В детстве мама пугала историями из «Беременна в 16» и рассказами об ИППП. Спасибо, мам, это правда полезно, но инструкцию к удовольств…

❤33🔥15❤‍🔥3

10 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC885 views25 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Насколько вас устраивает ваша сексуальная жизнь? Проверьте себя Опросники сексуальной удовлетворённости часто предлагают оценить именно отношения с партнёром. Один из таких инструментов — опросник Берг-Кросс (его должен заполнить каждый из партнёров, после чего вы вместе обсуждаете результаты). Наша адаптация — в карточке к посту. Но как оценить собственную сексуальную удовлетворённость, если вы не в отношениях? Ил…

❤‍🔥14❤5🔥5🕊1

8 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,050 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Почему возникает стыд за собственную сексуальность Привет! Пишет Ульяна, SMM Good Point. Поделюсь одной историей: ➰ Мне было лет 13, когда я впервые почувствовала себя сексуальной. У меня началась менструация, выросла грудь, и даже в обычной майке и юбке я ощущала себя набоковской Лолитой. Я замечала неловкие взгляды родственников на пляже: они будто не знали, куда смотреть, когда я была в купальнике. Мне хотелось…

❤19❤‍🔥11🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,090 views34 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

❤️Открываем экспресс-курс по собственной сексуальности онлайн 🔴старт 16 ноября Тема сексуальности окружена неловкостью, мифами, запретами и противоречивыми советами. Обычно её обсуждают либо в кабинете психолога, либо с подругой за бокалом вина, либо не обсуждают вовсе. 🍎Но сексуальность связана не только с сексом, она влияет на наши отношения с телом, возможность получать удовольствие, сближаться с другими людьми…

❤‍🔥18❤8🔥8

4 Nov 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,280 views71 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Ремиссия после депрессии: как себя поддерживать 🩵 рассказывает психолог Good Point Даша Бахтеева, недавно Даша делилась своим опытом послеродовой депрессии Жизнь в ремиссии может и не измениться по сравнению с жизнью до депрессии, но ее можно изменить. Депрессия — тяжёлый и всё же ценный опыт возвращения фокуса внимания на себя. К тому же, прививки от депрессии нет и ответственность за свой психический иммунитет мы…

❤71

2 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,280 views70 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Как прошли первые годы вашего материнства? Объявляем опен колл! Мы в Good Point стараемся поддерживать мам не только по праздникам. Многие из наших психологов сами мамы, мы много пишем о материнстве, делаем видимыми сложности, с которыми сталкиваются женщины во время беременности и после родов. Но в ноябре, перед Днем матери, традиционно посвящаем этой теме еще больше внимания. 🟣2 года назад мы создали спецпроект п…

❤34🔥19❤‍🔥17

29 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,480 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

UPD. Пару нашли! Ищем одну пару для парной терапии по льготной стоимости Психолог Good Point Ольга Ульянова приглашает одну пару на курс парной терапии по специальной цене — 3500 ₽ за встречу вместо обычных 7500 ₽. 🌟 Ольга сертифицируется в методе IBCT — интегративной поведенческой парной терапии. Это научно обоснованный подход, который помогает партнёрам лучше понять себя и друг друга, научиться справляться с конф…

❤19🕊1

27 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,290 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Арт-практики в психотерапии: новый способ взглянуть на ситуацию и себя 📱рассказывает психолог Good Point Ксения Ефименко В своей работе я люблю использовать творчество, а именно — наррадраму, это одна из арт-терапевтичеких школ в психологии. Для использования творческих методов в работе совершенно не обязательно, чтобы вы умели рисовать или писать стихи. Техники подбираются таким образом, чтобы легко получился рез…

❤26🔥15

22 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,820 views31 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Как проходят роды в разных культурах В новом эпизоде подкаста «С Верой в науку» разбираемся, как устроено родовспоможение в разных странах. Вы услышите истории доул, которые работают в Бразилии, Испании, Израиле и США. Они рассказали о своей работе, о культурных различиях, а также о плюсах и минусах системы родовспоможения там, где они практикуют. Ведущие обсудили эти истории и вспоминают собственные роды. ➡️ Слуш…

❤20❤‍🔥9🕊2

19 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,730 views58 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Можно ли ссориться при ребенке? В спектакле «Ася ищет слова» главная героиня слышит ссору родителей и привычный порядок ее жизни рушится. Она испытывает много разных эмоций, которые становятся импульсом к большому приключению-исследованию себя и мира вокруг. Часто мы думаем, что ребенка нужно оградить от ссор родителей. Но действительно ли это так? Отвечает Ксения Ефименко, психолог Good Point 🫧Идея, что ребёнка …

❤46🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @good_point_21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

Из-за чего вы как родители спорите чаще всего?

  1. Границы и правила53%
  2. Учеба и развитие20%
  3. Эмоции и истерики36%
  4. Быт и самостоятельность26%
  5. Наказания и последствия33%
  6. Свой вариант в комментариях4%

The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Школа Семейных Отношений Яны Катаевой
@yanakataeva · 29,120
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Федиатрия
@fediatrix · 53,862
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
Нет, это нормально
@net_etonorm · 23,086
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Точка опоры • Good Point” (@good_point_21), 7,890 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/good_point_21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.