Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for hade of the house

Channel

hade of the house

@hadeout

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,385subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001123566102
TypeChannel
Username@hadeout
Created30 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hadeout

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,32814,42714,377.57 August 2026 — 14,427 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,427 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,414 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,404 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,399 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,393 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,377 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,371 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,357 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,350 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,343 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,344 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,345 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,356 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,356 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,351 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,349 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,354 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,340 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,332 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,328 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,343 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,360 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,355 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,358 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,349 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,365 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,367 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,377 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,385 subscribers14,3857 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,313–14,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:0114,385+8
16 Sept 2026, 00:3914,377+10
14 Sept 2026, 04:2014,367+2
12 Sept 2026, 13:2214,365+16
10 Sept 2026, 12:1514,349-9
7 Sept 2026, 09:2014,358+3
4 Sept 2026, 13:3614,355-5
1 Sept 2026, 22:4914,360+17
1 Sept 2026, 00:4514,343+15
30 Aug 2026, 21:1714,328-4
29 Aug 2026, 22:2414,332-8
28 Aug 2026, 22:3414,340-14
27 Aug 2026, 19:2514,354+5
26 Aug 2026, 21:3514,349-2
25 Aug 2026, 20:4614,351-5
24 Aug 2026, 19:1914,356-9
23 Aug 2026, 01:0514,365+9
21 Aug 2026, 11:5714,356+11
20 Aug 2026, 11:4614,345+1
19 Aug 2026, 13:3314,344first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 14,385 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,750
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held40 (23 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total11,000
Reactions total863
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,153 reactions across 40 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,25273.4%
custom 53886278597639017671,07315.0%
💯4366.10%
👍3925.48%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
2 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,940
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,890
over 38 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGpCMhT17 August 20267 August 2026
2W5zFJmoBA1128 August 202628 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,590 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 538862785976390176747❤25👍6

1 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,810 views353 reactionsread 2 September 2026

так как в моем окружении и в целом, если поглядеть по сторонам, настроения какие-то грустные и даже упаднические, а я сама обнаружила, что хотя эмоционально я в порядке, но телесно у меня выражаются подавленные тревога и отчаяние, решила попробовать написать духоподъемный текст я периодически порываюсь написать своей психотерапевтке, попроситься на сессию (я не занимаюсь с психологом уже почти два года), но потом ду…

❤274💯55👍24

31 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈3,260 views342 reactionsread 2 September 2026

открыла для себя какой-то новый вид финансовой зависти: кликаю на видео на ютубе в духе «взяли квартиру в ипотеку в Португалии под 2%». Ну, интересно же что за ипотека такая. А они начинают с того что, «ну у нас был первоначальный взнос 200 000 евро, так как мы продали квартиру в Москве» закрываю видео я вот раньше не была подвержена рандомной зависти рандомным людям в интернете, но экономический кризис приносит м…

❤236custom 538862785976390176771💯35

31 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈3,340 views90 reactionsread 2 September 2026

у нас такая спайсиджусовая тема вышла на ютубе! кормить или не кормить, that is the question. Точнее, кормить, но чем) мне уже гораздо проще на эту тему говорить, чем в беременность, тогда я избегала отвечать на вопросы, собираюсь ли кормить грудью, потому что мне было очень стыдно за свой выбор. Хотя причина номер 1 (ежедневная мигрень) у меня, кажется, максимально уважительная. я забыла на выпуске сказать про пр…

❤80👍10

28 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,660 views137 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#почитать Даша Охоцимская - На этой планете взрослых нет Я начну с того, что книга мне понравилась. Она здорово написана, и я так быстро ее проглотила, что теперь жалею, что не сидела с маркером, потому что какие-то мысли и пассажи хотелось бы подчеркивать и записать себе. Опыт эмиграции, опыт первых отношений, опыт первых разочарований, поиск себя – хорошие и работающие темы книги Но есть несколько моих личных но:…

❤117💯12👍8

28 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,940 views90 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJmoBA1Photo

ребята, я принесла вам новую гиперфиксацию.... я обожаю кофе, но после обеда уже пить его не могу, у меня начинается тахикардия и болит голова (при этом если выпить утром, то эффект на самочувствие исключительно положительный, не знаю, в чем прикол) но жажда кофейного вкуса на языке у меня сохраняется в течение дня. И решение проблемы внезапно пришло в виде кофейных мишек из Tasty Coffee! Как слышится, так и пишетс…

❤65custom 538862785976390176717👍8

26 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈4,160 views179 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

сводка новостей моей личной и рабочей жизни: снимаем очень много выпусков Тут и ролики про диагнозы с врачами и психологами, и наши с Кариной про родительство, а также третий формат разговорчиков, где мы обсуждаем всякие социально-психологические темы. у нас снова скидки на и так недорогие курсы от нашего психологического центра. Если сейчас не до терапии, а помощь нужна, вот она. еще я купила себе очки с легким з…

❤150👍17custom 538862785976390176712

24 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈5,320 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Помните, я писала, что угорела по уходу за зубами? Продолжим же этот разговор) Чистить зубы щеткой с пастой два раза в день по 30 секунд — это, конечно, лучше, чем ничего, но этого недостаточно! Обязательно нужен флосс, мягкая щетка, монопучковая щетка, нормальная паста с фторида 1450, и иногда дополнительные средства для эмали и десен, особенно, если у вас высокая чувствительность, как у меня. Сейчас я тестирую EM…

❤45custom 538862785976390176710👍3

23 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC≈4,580 views100 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤64💯24custom 538862785976390176712

21 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC≈5,560 views373 reactionsread 31 August 2026

хочу обсудить провокационную, вероятно, тему – покупка детских вещей и игрушек нашей дочери уже через полтора месяца будет год. За этот год мы с Ромой купили ей из нового две футболки и две игрушки. кучу всего нам либо отдали, либо подарили. На одежду в первый год я реально не вижу смысла тратить деньги, или скорее, ресурсы планеты. Денег мне было бы не жалко, но это очень далеко от симпатичной мне концепции осозна…

❤291💯51👍31

21 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈4,920 views131 reactionsread 31 August 2026

доброе пятничное, начинаем утро с апатии...😴😞 Это тема новой статьи на нашем СП Медиа, которую написала клинический психолог нашего центра Ксения Беляева. Там рассматриваются отличия апатии от депресии и лени, и конечно, практические советы, как вернуть себе интерес к жизни. буду честна, сама периодически испытываю апатию в последние месяцы из-за всех новостей в мире. Я довольно оптимистичный человек по жизни и вер…

❤117custom 53886278597639017678👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @hadeout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,220
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Психотерапевт Наталья Зайцева
@psy_factum · 23,914
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
Доктор Сычев
@dr_sychev · 49,364
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Ок, ясно
@yasno_live · 111,313
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,992
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
Alter
@psyalter_ru · 26,803
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Anastasiya Astrology
@voskresenskayaanastasiya · 20,447
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 September 2026
Mindspa | Самопомощь
@mindspa_ru · 34,816
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 37,861
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Психиатр Онлайн
@psychiatristonline · 20,690
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
Доктор Сапият
@sunxsteel · 26,237
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Где моё внимание?
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 27,519
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Василиса Бутусова
@stillvasilisa · 24,637
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
DocDeti & DocMed
@docdeti_docmed · 63,234
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“hade of the house” (@hadeout), 14,385 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hadeout.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.